Patient Evaluation and Selection

  • M. J. B. Stallmeyer
  • Gregg H. Zoarski

Abstract

Vertebral compression fractures (VCF) result from osteoporosis, malignant primary or metastatic bone tumors, and benign infiltrative tumors such as vertebral hemangiomas. Pain relief constitutes the primary indication for percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV). The effectiveness of PV for prophylaxis in the absence of local pain and tenderness remains unproven. In considering whether a patient may be a candidate for PV, it is important to use both clinical and imaging assessment. When patients are properly selected and evaluated, this procedure has provided substantial pain relief in 75 to 90% of patients with benign fractures1–4 and in 59 to 86% of patients with malignant VCFs.2,4–8

Keywords

Vertebral Body Spinal Cord Compression Magnetic Reso Vertebral Compression Fracture Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cyteval C, Sarrabere MP, Roux JO, et al. Acute osteoporotic vertebral collapse: open study on percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement in 20 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173(6): 1685–1690.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Mortazavi R, et al. CT-guided interventional procedures for pain management in the lumbosacral spine. Radiographics 1998; 18(3):621–633.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, et al. Percutaneous polymethyl methacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. Am J Neuroradiol 1997; 18(10):1897–1904.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deramond H, Depriester C, Galibert P, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethyl methacrylate. Technique, indications, and results. Radiol Clin North Am 1998; 36(3)533–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, et al. Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology 1996; 199(l):241–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteolytic metastases or multiple myeloma [see comments]. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1997; 64(3):177–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cotten A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 1996; 200(2)525–530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaemmerlen P, Thiesse P, Jonas P, et al. Percutaneous injection of orthopedic cement in metastatic vertebral lesions [letter]. N Engl J Med 1989; 321(2):121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melton LJ, III. How many women have osteoporosis now? J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10(2):175–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Melton LJ, III, Kan SH, Frye MA, et al. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129(5):1000–1011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johansson C, Mellstrom D, Rosengren K, et al. Prevalence of vertebral fractures in 85-year-olds. Radiographic examination of 462 subjects. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64(l):25–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lyles KW, Gold DT, Shipp KM, et al. Association of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status. Am J Med 1993; 94(6):595–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, et al. Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 137(9): 1001–1005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patel U, Skingle S, Campbell GA, et al. Clinical profile of acute vertebral compression fractures in osteoporosis. Br J Rheumatol 1991; 30(6):418–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maynard AS, Jensen ME, Schweickert PA, et al. Value of bone scan imaging in predicting pain relief from percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21(10): 1807–1812.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baker LL, Goodman SB, Perkash I, et al. Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174(2):495–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cuenod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, et al. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology 1996; 199(2):541–549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heggeness MH. Spine fracture with neurological deficit in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1993; 3(4):215–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salomon C, Chopin D, Benoist M. Spinal cord compression: an exceptional complication of spinal osteoporosis. Spine 1988; 13(2):222–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kümmell H. Über die traumatischen Erkrankungen der Wirbelsaule. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1895; 21:180–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brower AC, Downey EF, Jr. Kummell disease: report of a case with serial radiographs. Radiology 1981; 141(2):363–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dupuy DE, Palmer WE, Rosenthal DI. Vertebral fluid collection associated with vertebral collapse. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167(6):1535–1538.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Do HM. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients for percutaneous vertebroplasty. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11(4): 235–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baur A, Stabler A, Bruning R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures [see comments]. Radiology 1998; 207(2):349–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castillo M, Arbelaez A, Smith JK, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21(5): 948–953.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim HJ, Ryu KN, Choi WS, et al. Spinal involvement of hematopoietic malignancies and metastasis: differentiation using MR imaging. Clin Imaging 1999; 23(2):125–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Maldague BE, et al. Vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma. Part I. Distribution and appearance at MR imaging [see comments]. Radiology 1997; 204(1): 195–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schmorl G, Junghanns H. The Human Spine in Health and Disease (Besemann EF, transl. ed.). 2nd ed. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1971.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krueger EG, Sobel GL, Weinstein C. Vertebral hemangioma with compression of spinal cord. J Neurosurg 1961; 18:331–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laredo JD, Assouline E, Gelbert F, et al. Vertebral hemangiomas: fat content as a sign of aggressiveness. Radiology 1990; 177(2):467–472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ghormley RK, Adson AW. Hemangioma of vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg 1941; 23(4):887–895.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    McAlister VL, Kendall BE, Bull JWD. Symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas. Brain 1975; 98:71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, et al. Vertebral hemangiomas: MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 165(1):165–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cotten A, Deramond H, Cortet B, et al. Preoperative percutaneous injection of methyl methacrylate and n-butyl cyanoacrylate in vertebral hemangiomas. Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17(1):137–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ide C, Gangi A, Rimmelin A, et al. Vertebral haemangiomas with spinal cord compression: the place of preoperative percutaneous vertebroplasty with methyl methacrylate. Neuroradiology 1996; 38(6): 585–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wells N. Back Pain. London: Office of Health Economics, 1985.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Roland MO, Morrell DC, Morris RW. Can general practitioners predict the outcome of episodes of back pain? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983; 286(6364):523–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Murray JA, Bruels MC, Lindberg RD. Irradiation of polymethyl methacrylate. In vitro gamma radiation effect. J Bone Joint Surg 1974; 56A(2):311–312.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mathis JM, Petri M, Naff N. Percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment of steroid-induced osteoporotic compression fractures. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41(1):171–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cardon T, Hachulla E, Flipo RM, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with acrylic cement in the treatment of a Langerhans cell vertebral histiocytosis. Clin Rheumatol 1994; 13(3)518–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    O’Brien JP, Sims JT, Evans AJ. Vertebroplasty in patients with severe vertebral compression fractures: a technical report. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21(8):1555–1558.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chiras J, Deramond H. Complications des vertebroplasties. In: Saillant G, Laville C, eds. Echecs et Complications de la Chirurgie du Rachis. Chirurgie de Reprise. Paris: Sauramps Medical; 1995:149–153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. B. Stallmeyer
  • Gregg H. Zoarski

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations