Measures of Quality Adjusted Life and Quality of Life Deficiency: Statistical Perspectives

  • Pranab K. Sen

Abstract

In the broad range WHO interpretation of Quality of Life, albeit made from an individualistic perspective, there are numerous qualitative factors along with some relatively more quantitative ones which are useful in the context of health related quality of life assessment problems. Though item analysis is commonly used in practice for (quantitative) risk assessment, for drawing valid conclusions, statistical reasoning is essential. Quality of life, survival time and quality adjusted life are important (population-based) measures that need to be appraised in light of statistical and health-related undercurrents. This paper addresses some basic statistical issues prevailing in this context.

Keywords

Gini Coefficient Utility Score Quality Adjusted Life Poverty Index Quality Adjusted Survival 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chatterjee, S.K. and Sen, P.K. (2000). On stochastic ordering and a general class of poverty indexes. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 50, 137–156.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, P.L. and Sen, P.K. (2001). Quality adjusted survival estimation with periodic observations. Biometrics 57, 868–874.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox, D.R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A.E., Gore, S.M., Spiegelhalter, D.J. and Jones, D.R. (1992). Quality of Life assessment: can we keep it simple? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 155, 353–393.Google Scholar
  4. Fayers, P.M. and Machin, D. (2000). Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Gelber, R.D. and Goldhirsch, A. (1986). A new endpoint for the assessment of adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4, 1772–1779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gelber, R.D., Gelman, R.S. and Goldhirsch, A. (1989). A quality-of-life oriented endpoint for comparing therapies. Biometrics 45, 781–795.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gelber, R.D., Cole, B.F., Gelber, S. and Goldhirsch, A. (1995). Comparing treatments using quality-adjusted survival: the Q-TWIST method. The American Statistician 49, 161–169.Google Scholar
  8. Glasziou, P.P., Simes, R.J., and Gelber, R.D. (1990). Quality adjusted survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine 9, 1259–1276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldhirsch, A., Gelber, R.D., Simes, R.J., Glasziou, P. and Coates, A. (1989). Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group: cost and benefit analysis of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a quality adjusted survival analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology 7, 36–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Karnofsky, D. and Burchenal, J. (1949). The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: McLeod, C. (ed.). Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.191–205.Google Scholar
  11. Nayak, T.K. (1986). An analysis of diversity using Rao’s quadratic entropy. Sankhyā, Series B 48, 1–9.Google Scholar
  12. Nayak, T.K., and Gastwirth, J.L. (1989). The use of diversity analysis to assess the relative influence of factors affecting the income distribution. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 7, 453–460.Google Scholar
  13. Rao, C.R. (1982). Diversity: its measurement, decomposition, apportionment and analysis. Sankhyã, Series A 44, 1–21.Google Scholar
  14. Sen, A.K. (1976). The measurement of poverty: an axiomatic approach. Econometrica 44, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sen, P.K. (1986). The Gini coefficient and the poverty indexes: some reconciliation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81, 1050–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sen, P.K. (1996). Statistics and quality of life: third world perspectives. Journal of Applied Statistical Science 4, 231–252.Google Scholar
  17. Sen, P.K. (1999). Utility-oriented Gini-Simpson type indexes. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin 49, 1–22.Google Scholar
  18. Staquet, M.J., Hays, R.D. and Fayers, P.M. (eds.) (1998). Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Steinbrocker, O., Traeger, C. and Battman, S. (1949). Therapeutic criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of the American Medical Association 140, 659–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. WHOQOL Group (1994). The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument (the WHOQOL). In: Orley, J. and Kuyken, W. (eds.). Quality of Life Assessment in Health Care Setting. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Zhao, H. and Tsiatis, A.A. (2000). Estimating mean quality of lifetime with censored data. Sankhyā, Series B 62, 175–188.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pranab K. Sen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations