Performance Analysis

  • Idelfonso Tafur Monroy
  • Eduward Tangdiongga
Chapter
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 678)

Abstract

This chapter describes a number of evaluation methods used to analyze the detection performance of optical systems which are disturbed by interferometric crosstalk. Computation methods based on Gaussian approximation, Modified Chernoff bound, and Saddlepoint approximation have powerful computational characteristics that they are frequently used for crosstalk analyses. A comparative assessment covering computational performance is made for these methods in terms of their formulation complexity, accuracy, and computational speed.

Keywords

Phase Function Gaussian Approximation Moment Generate Function Extinction Ratio Saddlepoint Approximation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E. L. Goldstein, L. Eskildsen, and A. F. Elrefaie, “Performance Implications of Component Crosstalk in Transparent Lightwave Networks,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 6, pp. 657–660, May 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    E. L. Goldstein and L. Eskildsen, “Scaling Limitations in Transparent Optical Networks Due to Low-Level Crosstalk,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 7, pp. 93–94, Jan. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. L. Goldstein, L. Eskildsen, C. Lin, and Y. Silberberg, “Polarization Statistics of Crosstalk-Induced Noise in Transparent Lightwave Networks,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 7, pp. 1345–1347, Nov. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. Takahashi, K. Oda, and H. Toba, “Impact of Crosstalk in an Arrayed-Waveguide Multiplexer on N × N Optical Interconnection,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave Technol, vol. 14, pp. 1097–1105, June 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. J. Legg, M. Tur, and I. Andonovic, “Solution Paths to Limit Interferometric Noise Induced Performance Degradation in ASK/Direct Detection Lightwave Networks,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave TechnoL, vol. 14, pp. 1943–1954, Sept. 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Y. D. Jin and M. Kavehrad, “Performance Degradation due to Crosstalk in Multiwave-length Optical Networks using Dynamic Wavelength Routing,” IEEE Photon. Technol Lett., vol. 7, pp. 1210–1212, Oct. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Zhou, M. J. O’Mahony, and S. D. Walker, “Analysis of Optical Crosstalk Effects in Multi-Wavelength Switched Networks,” IEEE Photon. TechnoL Lett., vol. 6, pp. 302–305, Feb. 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. L. Gimlett and N. K. Cheung, “Effects of Phase-to-intensity Noise Conversion by Multiple Reflections on Gigabit-per-Second DFB Laser Transmission Systems,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave TechnoL, vol. 7, pp. 888–895, June 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. D. Personick, P. Balaban, J. H. Bobsin, and P. R. Kumar, “A Detailed Comparison of Four Approaches to the Calculation of the Sensitivity of Optical Fiber System Receivers,” IEEE Trans, on Comm., vol. 25, pp. 541–548, May 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. F. B. Ribeiro, J. R. F. da Rocha, and J. L. Pinto, “Performance Evaluation of EDFA Preamplified Receivers Taking into Account Intersymbol Interference,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave TechnoL, vol. 13, pp. 225–232, Feb. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    V. K. Prabhu, “Modified Chernoff Bounds for RAM Systems with Noise and Interference,” IEEE Trans, on Inform. Theory, vol. 28, pp. 95–100, Jan. 1982.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. J. O’Reilly and J. R. F. da Rocha, “Improved Error Probability Evaluation Methods for Direct Detection Optical Communication Systems,” IEEE Trans, on Inform. Theory, vol. 33, pp. 839–848, Nov. 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. J. O’Reilly, J. R. F. da Rocha, and K. Schumacher, “Optical Fiber Direct Detection Receivers Optimally Tolerant to Jitter,” IEEE Trans, on Comm., vol. 34, pp. 1141–1147, Nov. 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    K. Schumacher and J. J. O’Reilly, “Relationship Between the Saddlepoint Approximation and the Modified Chernoff Bound,” IEEE Trans, on Comm., vol. 38, pp. 270–272, Mar. 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. E. Mitchell, P. M. Lane, and J. J. O’Reilly, “Evaluation of Extinction Ratio Induced Performance Penalty due to Interferometric Noise,” Electron. Lett., vol. 35, pp. 964–965, June 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A. M. J. Koonen and D. T. van Veen, “Estimating Error Probabilities caused by In-Band and Outband Crosstalk in Multi-Wavelength All-Optical Networks,” in Proc. IEEE/LEOS Symp. Benelux Chapter, pp. 169–172, Eindhoven-The Netherlands, Nov. 1997.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    C. W. Helstrom, “Performance Analysis of Optical Receivers by the Saddlepoint Approximation,” IEEE Trans, on Comm., vol. 27, pp. 186–191, Jan. 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. W. Helstrom, “Computing the Performance of Optical Receivers with Avalanche Diode Detectors,” IEEE Trans, on Comm., vol. 36, pp. 61–66, Jan. 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    I. Tafur Monroy and E. Tangdiongga, “Performance Evaluation of Optical Cross-connects by Saddlepoint Approximation,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave TechnoL, vol. 16, pp. 317–323, Mar. 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. Remondo, R. Srinivasan, V. F. Nicola, W. C. van Etten, and H. E. P. Tattje, “Adaptive Importance Sampling for Performance Evaluation and Parameter Optimization of Communication Systems,” IEEE Trans, on Comm., vol. 48, pp. 557–565, Apr. 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. J. O’Reilly and C. J. Appleton, “System Performance Implications of Homodyne Beat Noise Effects in Optical Fibre Network,” in IEE Proc, Part J: Optoelectronics, vol. 142, pp. 143–148, June 1995.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    K.-P. Ho, “Analysis of Co-channel Crosstalk Interference in Optical Networks,” Electron. Lett., vol. 34, pp. 383–385, Feb. 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T. Gyselings, Investigation and Reduction of Crosstalk in Wavelength Division Multiplexed All-Optical Cross Connects. PhD thesis, University of Gent, Belgium, July 2000.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    E. Tangdiongga, R. J. W. Jonker, H. de Waardt, I. Tafur Monroy, T. Gyselings, G. Morthier, R. Baets, and A. Lowery, “Complete Assessment of Crosstalk Reduction in WDM Net-works by Phase Scrambling,” in Proc. 25th European Conf. on Optical Comm. (ECOC’99), vol. II, pp. 210–211, Nice-France, Sept. 1999.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    L. Eskildsen and P. B. Hansen, “Interferometric Noise in Lightwave Systems with Optical Preamplifiers,” IEEE Photon. TechnoL Lett., vol. 9, pp. 1538–1540, Nov. 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    W. D. Cornwell and I. Andonovic, “Interferometric Noise for A Single Interferer: Comparison between Theory and Experiment,” Electron. Lett., vol. 32, pp. 1501–1502, Aug. 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    H. J. S. Dorren, H. de Waardt, and I. Tafur Monroy, “Statistical Analysis of Crosstalk in WDM Networks,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightwave TechnoL, vol. 17, pp. 2425–2430, Dec. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Idelfonso Tafur Monroy
    • 1
  • Eduward Tangdiongga
    • 1
  1. 1.COBRA InstituteEindhoven University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations