Optical Imaging and In Vivo Microscopy

  • Zuxing Kan
  • E. Edmund Kim

Abstract

Useful images of hidden structures or pathological lesions can be created with X-rays, ultrasound, radioactive tracer, and magnetic resonance. However, there are many biological processes that cannot be easily or directly monitored by using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or nuclear imaging because key molecules in these processes are not distinguishable from each other with these imaging techniques. Light penetrates tissue and is reflected at the surface. Whatever light does penetrate tissue is scattered widely so that shadows of internal structures are blurred beyond recognition. Light has been used in all the varieties of endoscopic imaging, where rigid or flexible tubes are inserted through incisions or natural body openings.

Keywords

Green Fluorescent Protein Portal Vein Optical Coherence Tomography Hepatic Artery Kupffer Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boppart SA, Bouma BE, Pitris C, et al. Intraoperative assessment of microsurgery with three-dimensional optical coherence tomography. Radiology 1998;208:81–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tearney G, Brezinski M, Bouma B, et al. In vivo endoscopic optical biopsy with optical coherence tomography. Science 1997;277:2037–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hebden JC, Delpy DT. Diagnostic imaging with light. Br J Radiol 1997;70:S206–S214.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benaron D, Stevenson D. Optical time-of-flight and absorbance imaging of biologic media. Science 1993;259:1463–1466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahmood U, Tung C-H, Bogdanov A Jr, Weissleder R. Near-infrared optical imaging of protease activity for tumor detection. Radiology 1999;213:866–870.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rao JS, Steck PA, Mohanam S, et al. Elevated levels of M(r) 92,000 type IV collagenase in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 1993;53: 2208–2211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCuskey RS. Microscopic methods for studying the microvasculature of internal organs. In: Baker CH, Nastuk WF, eds. Physical Techniques in Biology and Medicine: Microvascular Technology. New York: Academic Press, 1986:247–264.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grisham JW, Nopanitaya W. Scanning electron microscopy of casts of hepatic microvessels. Review of methods and results. In: Lautt WW, ed. Hepatic Circulation in Health and Disease. New York: Raven Press, 1981:87–109.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kan Z, Ivancev K, Lunderquist A, et al. In vivo microscopy of hepatic tumors in animal models: a dynamic investigation of blood supply to hepatic metastases. Radiology 1993;187:621–626.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charnsangavej C, Wallace S. Interventional radiologic techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatobiliary malignancy. In: Wanebo H, ed. Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Philadelphia: LippincottRaven,1997:597–606.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakakuma K, Uemura K, Kono T, et al. Studies on anticancer treatment with anticancer drug injected into the ligated hepatic artery for liver cancer (preliminary report). Nichidoku Iho 1979; 24:675–682.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kan Z, Ivancev K, Hagerstrabd I, et al. In vivo microscopy of the liver after injection of Lipiodol into the hepatic artery and portal vein in the rat. Acta Radiol Diagn 1989;30:419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kan Z, Sato M, Ivancev K, et al. Distribution and effect of iodized poppyseed oil in the liver after hepatic artery embolization: experimental study in several animal species. Radiology 1993;186: 861–866.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kan Z, Ivancev K, Lunderquist A. Peribiliary plexus: an important pathway to the portal vein for Lipiodol and Microfil when injected into the hepatic artery. Invest Radiol 1994;29:671–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kan Z, Wallace S. Sinusoidal embolization: impact of iodized oil on hepatic microcirculation. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1994;5:881–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kan Z, Wallace S. Transcatheter liver lobar ablation: an experimental trial in an animal model. Eur Radiol 1997;7:1071–1075.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng YF, Kan Z, Chen CL, et al. The efficacy and safety of preoperative lobar or segmental ablation via transarterial administration of ethiodol and ethanol mixture in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical study. World J Surg 2000, in press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin SY, Wu WH. Physical parameters and release behaviors of w/o/w multiple emulsions containing cosurfactants and different specific gravity of oil. Pharm Acta Helv 1991;66:342–347.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kan Z, Wright K, Wallace S. Ethiodol oil emulsion in hepatic microcirculation: in vivo microscopy in animal models. Acad Radiol 1997;4: 275–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Evans CW. The invasion and metastatic behaviour of malignant cells. In: Evans CW, ed. The Metastatic Cell: Behavior and Biochemistry. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991:137–214.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kan Z, Ivancev K, Lunderquist A, et al. In vivo microscopy of hepatic metastases: dynamic observations of tumor cell invasion and interaction with Kupffer cells. Hepatology 1995;21:487–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rost FD. Principles of fluorescence microscopy. Fluorochrometry. In: Rost FD, ed. Fluorescence Microscopy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992;1–10:80–107.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steams T. Green fluorescent protein: the green revolution. Curr Biol 1995;5:262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heim R, Cubitt AB, Tsien RY. Improved green fluorescence. Nature (Lond) 1995;373:663–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chishima T, Miyagi Y, Wang X, et al. Cancer invasion and micrometastasis visualization in liver tissue by green fluorescent protein expression. Cancer Res 1997;57:2042–2047.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kan Z, Liu TJ. Video microscopy of tumor metastasis: using the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene as a cancer-cell-labeling system. Clin Exp Metastasis 1999;17:49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Naumov GN, Wilson SM, MacDonald IC, et al. Cellular expression of green fluorescent protein, coupled with high-resolution in vivo videomicroscopy, to monitor steps in tumor metastasis. J Cell Sci 1999;112:1835–1842.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zuxing Kan
  • E. Edmund Kim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations