Resource Allocation Dilemmas in Large Federal Healthcare Systems

  • W. Paul KearnsIII
  • Julie Hall
  • W. Todd Grams
  • Gina Barhoumy
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

Achieving equitable allocation of financial resources within health programs is a continuing challenge within large federal healthcare systems. In the latter half of the 1990s, the public sector’s two largest healthcare systems—the Department of Defense’s Military Health System (MHS) and The Veterans Department’s Veterans Health Administration (VHA)—both faced this daunting task. The DoD’s MHS and the VHA both have large but constrained budgets that must meet growing beneficiary needs: the MHS has an annual budget of $16 billion, and the VHA’s annual budget is $18 billion. Not only were these systems confronted with the difficulty of distributing health resources across complex, bureaucratic organizations, they also faced the obstacle of changing years of financial allocation tradition. The old system, based on rewarding workload production, strongly emphasized high utilization of costly inpatient services. This approach clashed with the healthcare industry’s new focus on shifting as much inpatient care as is clinically appropriate to the ambulatory setting to increase healthcare quality and cost-effectiveness and improve consumer access to care.

Keywords

Veteran Health Administration Cost Containment Fiscal Year General Account Office Military Health System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs. 1998. Veterans Equitable Resource Allocation: VERA. Brochure, Veterans Health Administration Office of Finance.Google Scholar
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs. 1999. Veterans Equitable Resource Allocation 1999. Publication of the Veterans Health Administration.Google Scholar
  3. PricewaterhouseCoopers. 1998. Report: Veterans Equitable Resource Allocation Assessment.Google Scholar
  4. Preparing the Military Health Services System (MHSS) for Capitation-based Resource Allocation. Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) policy memorandum, July 23,1993.Google Scholar
  5. TRICARE Marketing Office. 1998. TRICARE Introduction, OASD(HA), (http://www.ha.osd.mil).Google Scholar
  6. VA website, http://www.va.gov/vhareorg/reengl0–98.doc

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Paul KearnsIII
  • Julie Hall
  • W. Todd Grams
  • Gina Barhoumy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations