Crisis Transmission: Evidence from the Debt, Tequila, and Asian Flu Crises

  • José De Gregorio
  • Rodrigo O. Valdés

Abstract

The increasing globalization of the economy has put the issue of the international transmission of crises in the front line. Although the word contagion is a rather new concept in international finance, it is the focus of a large number of policy-oriented seminars and debates. The clustering of crises by both region and time are at the heart of this discussion. There are several important questions that need to be answered. In this chapter we focus on a subset of them: (i) What are the propagation channels of international crises across countries (other than common shocks)? (ii) Was the debt crisis contagious? And (iii) are there useful policy instruments to shield countries from contagion? In particular, do capital controls, exchange rate flexibility and the external debt-maturity structure affect contagion? We seek to answer these questions using evidence from three key events: the 1982 debt crisis; the 1994 Mexican devaluation; and the 1997 Asian crisis.

Keywords

Current Account Real Exchange Rate Credit Rating Debt Crisis Current Account Deficit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg, Andrew, and Catherine Pattillo (1998). “Are Currency Crises Predictable? A Test.” IMF Working Paper No. 98 /154.Google Scholar
  2. De Gregorio, José, Sebastian Edwards, and Rodrigo O. Valdés (2000). “Capital Controls: Do They Work?” Forthcoming in Journal of Development Economics.Google Scholar
  3. De Gregorio, José, Barry Eichengreen, Takatoshi Ito, and Charles Wyplosz (1999). An Independent and Accountable IMF. Geneva: International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies and CEPR.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, Sebastian (1999). “How Effective are Capital Controls?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eichengreen, Barry, Andrew Rose, and Charles Wyplosz (1997). “Contagious Currency Crises.” NBER Working Paper No. 5681.Google Scholar
  6. Glick, Reuven, and Andrew Rose (1999). “Contagion and Trade.” Journal of International Money And Finance, 18: 603–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gourinchas, Pierre Olivier, Oscar Landerretche, and Rodrigo O. Valdés (1998). “Credit Booms: The Stylized Facts.” Central Bank of Chile, mimeo.Google Scholar
  8. Goldfajn, Ilan, and Rodrigo O. Valdés (1999). “The Aftermath of Appreciations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 14: 229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaminsky, Graciela, and Carmen Reinhart (1998). “On Crises, Contagion, and Confusion.” University of Maryland, mimeo.Google Scholar
  10. Kaminsky, Graciela, and Carmen Reinhart (1999). “The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance of Payments Problems.” American Economic Review, 89: 473–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaminsky, Graciela, Saul Lizondo, and Carmen Reinhart (1998). “Leading Indicators of Currency Crises.” IMF Staff Papers, March.Google Scholar
  12. Rigobón, Roberto (1999). “On the Measurement of the International Propagation of Shocks.” MIT, mimeo.Google Scholar
  13. Sachs, Jeffrey, Aaron Tomell, and Andrés Velasco (1996). “Financial Crises in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from 1995.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • José De Gregorio
    • 1
  • Rodrigo O. Valdés
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidad de ChileChile
  2. 2.Banco Central de ChileChile

Personalised recommendations