The Inorganic Carbon Complex: Alkalinity, Acidity, CO2, pH, Total Inorganic Carbon, Hardness, Aluminum

  • Robert G. Wetzel
  • Gene E. Likens
Chapter

Abstract

Precipitation falling on the surface of the Earth as rain or snow contains a variety of gases. Aerosols or dust particles also may be dissolved or picked up from the air. Thus, by the time the water reaches the Earth’s surface, it is no longer pure. As it flows over or penetrates into plants or the ground, water dissolves more gases, notably carbon dioxide, and various mineral substances with which it comes into contact. When CO2 dissolves in water, carbonic acid is formed: Open image in new window and pH is lowered.

Most minerals are only slightly soluble in water, and appreciable amounts usually are not dissolved. For example, limestone (calcium carbonate, CaCO3) is but slightly soluble in pure water. Limestone is much more soluble, however, in water containing carbonic acid, whereby the CaCO3 is changed to calcium bicarbonate: Open image in new window

The dissolved CO2 has a parked effect on the properties of the water. It forms a weak, carbonic acid solution that can change the pH of the water and dissolve minerals, which in turn can increase alkalinity and impart hardness to the water. The amount of dissolved salts in water is of major importance to the maintenance of life and in the treatment of water for domestic and industrial use.

In addition to bicarbonates, carbonates, and hydroxides, other minerals that often dissolve in water in moderate amounts are silica and the chlorides, sulfates, and nitrates of calcium, magnesium, sodium, and potassium. With increased emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere from industrial activities, (SO 4 2- ) is becoming the dominant anion in precipitation of large geographical areas. In those areas the geo-chemical relationships as described above may be altered appreciably.

Inorganic carbon as dissolved CO2 and HCO 3 - is the primary source of carbon for photosynthesis by algae and larger aquatic plants in natural waters. This utilization is balanced by respiratory production of CO2 by most organisms and by influxes of CO2 and HCO 3 - from incoming water and from the atmosphere. The amounts of inorganic carbon available for use in photosynthesis are adequate in most natural fresh waters; only under special conditions of soft waters and intensely productive situations does inorganic carbon become a limiting factor to photosynthesis of planktonic algae.

Natural waters exhibit wide variations in this relative acidity and alkalinity, not only in actual pH values, but also in the total amount of dissolved material producing the acidity or alkalinity. The concentrations of these compounds and the ratios of one to another determine the observed pH and the capacity for buffering of a given body of water. The lethal effects of most acids appear when pH < 5.5 and of most alkalis near pH 9.5, although the tolerances of many organisms are considerably more restricted within these pH extremes. Thus, the buffering capacity of natural waters to resist changes in pH can be of great importance to the maintenance of life.

Keywords

Methyl Orange Inorganic Carbon Dissolve Inorganic Carbon Total Alkalinity Acid Neutralize Capa City 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Public Health Association et al. 1998. Standard methods for the Examination of Water, Sewage, and Wastewater. 20th Ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D. C. 1185 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Asbury, C.E., F.A. Vertucci, M.D. Mattson, and G.E. Likens. 1989. Acidification of Adirondack lakes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23:362–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, J.P. and C.L. Schofield. 1982. Aluminum toxicity to fish in acidic waters. Water Air Soil Pollut. 18:289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, PR. and M.S. Erich. 1996. The quantitation of aqueous aluminum, chapter 1, pp. 1–38. In: G. Sposito, Editor. The Environmental Chemistry of Aluminum. 2nd Ed. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  5. Cronan, C.S. and C.L. Schofield. 1979. Aluminum leaching response to acid precipitation: effects on high elevation watersheds in the Northeast. Science 204:304–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Driscoll, C.T. 1984. A procedure for the fractionation of aqueous aluminum in dilute acidic waters. Internat. Four. Environ. Analy. Chem. 16:267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Driscoll, C.T, J.P. Baker, J.J. Bisogni, and C.L. Schofield. 1980. Effect of aluminum speciation on fish in dilute and acidified waters. Nature 284:161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Driscoll, CT. and K.M. Postek. 1996. The chemistry of aluminum in surface waters, pp. 363–418. In: G. Sposito, Editor. The Environmental Chemistry of Aluminum, 2nd Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  9. Edmond, J.M. 1970. High precision determination of titration alkalinity and total carbon dioxide content of sea water by Potentiometric titration. Deep-Sea Res. 17:737–750.Google Scholar
  10. Galster, H. 1991. pH Measurement: Fundamentals, Methods, Applications, Instrumentation. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim. 355 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Golterman, H.L. and R.S. Clymo, (eds). 1969. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No. 8. Blackwell, Oxford. 172 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Gran, G. 1952. Determination of the equivalence point in Potentiometrie titrations. Part II. Analyst 77:661–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodges, S.C. 1987. Aluminum speciation: a comparison of five methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51:57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hongve, D. 1993. Total and reactive aluminum concentrations in non-turbid Norwegian surface waters. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 25:133–136.Google Scholar
  15. McAvoy, D.C., R.C. Santore, J.D. Shosa, and C.T. Driscoll. 1992. A comparison between pyrocatechol violet and 8-hydroxyquinoline procedures for determining aluminum fractions. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 56:449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Menzel, D.W. and R.F. Vaccaro. 1964. The measurement of dissolved organic and particulate carbon in sea water. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9:138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nygaard, G 1965. Hydrographie studies, especially on the carbon dioxide system, in Grane Langsø. Biol. Skr. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 14(2) 110 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Rainwater, F.H. and L.L. Thatcher. 1960. Methods for collection and analysis of water samples. USDI Geol. Surv. Water-Supply Paper 1454. 301 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Saunders, G.W., F.B. Trama, and R.W. Bachmann. 1962. Evaluation of a modified 14C technique for shipboard estimation of photosynthesis in large lakes. Publ. Great Lakes Res. Div., Univ. Mich. 8, 61 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Schindler, D.W. and E.J. Fee. 1973. Diurnal variation of dissolved inorganic carbon and its use in estimating primary production and CO2 invasion in Lake 227. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 30:1501–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schindler, D.W., R.V. Schmidt, and R.A. Reid. 1972. Acidification and bubbling as an alternative to filtration in determining phytoplankton production by the 14C method. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 29:1627–1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stainton, M.P. 1973. A syringe gas-stripping procedure for gas-chromatographic determination of dissolved inorganic carbon and organic carbon in fresh water and carbonates in sediments. J. Fish Res. Bd. Canada 30:1441–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stumm, W and J.J. Morgan. 1981. Aquatic Chemistry. 2nd Ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 780 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Stumm, W and J.J. Morgan. 1996. Aquatic Chemistry. 3rd Ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 1022 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Wetzel, R.G 1999. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. 3rd Ed. Academic Press, San Diego (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Wetzel
    • 1
  • Gene E. Likens
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of Arts and SciencesUniversity of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Cary ArboretumThe New York Botanical GardenMillbrookUSA

Personalised recommendations