Project Selection and Control

  • Oleg I. Larichev
  • David L. Olson
Chapter

Abstract

We have seen a number of instances of selection of an alternative from a small number of alternatives. In this chapter we will look at two applications of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to this type of decision problem. The first application used AHP in a control problem for a pipeline project (Dey, et al., 1994, 1996, 1998). We will discuss different multicriteria pipeline applications further in Chapter 7. The second AHP application involved water planning and development projects (Srinivasa Raju and Pillai, 1999a, 1999b). AHP has been applied to many decision problems in business, as discussed in Chapter 2. It has been applied to other public works policy decisions as well, notably Hämäläinen (1988, 1990, 1991) who developed a decision support system for Finnish leaders to study tradeoffs in electrical generation alternatives.

Keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process Work Package Pairwise Comparison Matrix Project Selection Pairwise Comparison Matrice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barzilai, J. On the decomposition of value functions, Operations Research Letters 22, 1998, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barzilai, J., Cook, W.D. and Golany, B. Consistent weights for judgements matrices of the relative importance of alternatives, Operations Research Letters 6:3, 1987, 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banae Costa, C.A. and Vansnick, J.C. Applications of the MACBETH aapproach in the framework of an additive aggregation model, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6:2, 1997, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belton, V. & Gear, T., On a shortcoming of Saaty’s method of analytical hierarchies, Omega 11:3,1983, 227–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dey, P.K., Tabucanon, M.T., and Ogunlana, S.O. Planning for project control through risk analysis: A petroleum pipeline, International Journal of Project Management 12:1, 1994, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dey, P.K., Tabucanon, M.T. and Ogunlana, S.O. Petroleum pipeline construction planning: A conceptual framework, International Journal of Project Management 14:4,1996, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dey, P.K., Ogunlana, S.O., Gupta, S.S. and Tabucanon, M.T. A risk-based maintenance model for cross-country pipelines. Cost Engineering 40:4, 1998,24–31.Google Scholar
  8. Gershon, M., and Duckstein, L. Multi objective approaches to river basin planning. Journal of Water Resources Planning management 109:1, 1983,13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hämäläinen, R.P. Computer assisted energy policy analysis in the Parliament of Finland, Interfaces 18:4, 1988, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hämäläinen, R.P. A decision aid in the public debate on nuclear power, European Journal of Operational Research 48:1, 1990, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hämäläinen, R.P. Facts or values — how do parliamentarians and experts see nuclear power? Energy Policy 19:5, 1991, 464–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ko, S.K., Fontane, D.G. and Margeta, J. Multiple reservoir system operational planning using multi-criterion decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 76, 1994,428–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lootsma, F. A. Scale sensitivity in a multiplicative variant of the AHP and SMART, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 2:2, 1993, 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lootsma, F.A. and Schuijt, H. The multiplicative AHP, SMART, and ELECTRE in a common context, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6:4, 185–196Google Scholar
  15. Saaty, T. L., Rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Decision Sciences 18, 2,1987, 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Srinivasa Raju, K. and Pillai, C.R.S. Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development, European Journal of Operational Research 112, 1999a, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Srinivasa Raju, K. and Pillai, C.R.S. Multicriterion decision making in performance evaluation of an irrigation system, European Journal of Operational Research 112, 1999b, 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oleg I. Larichev
    • 1
  • David L. Olson
    • 2
  1. 1.Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Texas A&M UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations