Angiography of Congenital Heart Disease

  • Taylor Chung
  • Patricia E. Burrows

Abstract

Comprehensive review of physical principles of roentgenology is beyond the scope of this chapter(1–3). The following is a brief introduction to the basic principles on roentgenology for the cardiologists who perform catheterizations and interventional procedures.

Keywords

Ventricular Septal Defect Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Balloon Occlusion Atrioventricular Valve Double Outlet Right Ventricle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Curry TS, Dowdey JE, Murry RC. Christensen’s introduction to the physics of diagnostic radiology. In: 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger, 1990Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sprawls P. The physical principles of diagnostic radiology. In: Rockville, MD: Aspen, 1977Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moore RJ. Imaging principles of cardiac angiography. In: Rockville, MD: Aspen, 1990Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nissen SE, Pepine CJ, Bashore TM. Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a “tower of Babel” in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:834–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stewart BK. Exchange media and networks for digital fluoroscopy and cineangiography. In: Syllabus: categorical course in physics. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 1995:153–165Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holmes Jr. DJ. To compress or not, that is the question. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 1995;36:382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balter S. Guidelines for personnel radiation monitoring in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;30:277–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson LW, Moore RJ, Balter S. Review of radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;25:186–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Recommendations on limits for exposure to ionizing radiation. NCRP Report 91. In: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1987Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Merriam GR, Focht EF. A clinical study of radiation cataracts and the relationship to dose. Am J Roentgenol 1957;77:759–785Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schueler BA, Julsrud PR, Gray JE, et al. Radiation exposure and efficiency of exposure-reduction techniques during cardiac catheterization in children. Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cagnon CH, Benedict SH, Mankovic NJ, et al. Exposure rates in high-level-control fluoroscopy for image enhancement. Radiology 1991;178:643–646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA. Potential biological effects following high x-ray dose interventional prodcedure. JVIR 1994;5:71–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aufrichtig R, Xue P, Thomas CW, et al. Perceptual comparison of pulse and continuous fluoroscopy. Med Phys 1994;21:245–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hernandez RJ, Goodsitt MM. Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 1996;67:1247–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holmes Jr. DR, Wondrow MA, Gray JE, et al. Effect of pulsed progressive fluoroscopy on reduction of radiation dose in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parker JE, Bettmann MA. Angiographic contrast media. In: Taveras J, Ferrucci J, eds. Radiology: Diagnosis-Imaging-Intervention. Vol 2. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1992:Ch 135A, pp 1–10.(Yucel K, ed. Vascular Radiology).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dawson P, Howell M. The non-ionic dimers: a new class of contrast agents. Br J Radiology 1986;59:987–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tveit K, Bolstad KD, Haugland T, et al. Iodixanol in cardioangiography. Acta Radiologica 1994;35:614–618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fischer HW. Catalog of intravascular contrast media. Radiology 1986;159:561–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klow NE, Levorstad K, Berg KJ, et al. Iodixanol in cardioangiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Acta Radiologica 1993;34:72–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohan RH, Dunnick NR. Intravascular contrast media: adverse reaction. Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parfrey PS, Griffiths SM, Barrett BJ, et al. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both: a prospective controlled study. NEJM 1989;320:143–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cohen MD. A review of the toxicity of nonionic contrast agent in children. Invest Radiol 1993;28:S87-S93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bettmann MA, Bourdillon PD, Gopalan R, et al. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs a standard ionic agent. Radiology 1984;153:583–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS, Vavasour HM, et al. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization. NEJM 1992;326:431–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siegle RL. Rates of idiosyncratic reactions: Ionic versus nonionic contrast media. Invest Radiol 1993;28:S95-S98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Palmer FJ. The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions: final report. Australas Radiol 1988;32:426–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: the report from the Japanese Committee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 1990;175:621–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Verma R, Keane JF. Use of cutoff pigtail catheters with intraluminal guidewires in interventional procedures in congenital heart disease. Cathet Cardiôvasc Diagn 1994;33:85–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Keane JF, McFaul R, Fellows K, et al. Balloon occlusion angiography in infancy: methodology, uses and limitations. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:495–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fiddler GI, Partridge JB. Balloon occlusion angiography in critically ill neonates. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn 1983;9:309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Culham JAG. Physical principles of image formation and projections in angiocardiography. In: Freedom RM, Mawson JB, Yoo SJ, Benson LN, eds. Congenital Heart Disease. Vol 1. Armonk: Futura Publishing Company, 1997:39–93Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bargeron LM, Jr, Elliot LP, Soto B, et al. Axial cineangiography in congenital heart disease. Section I: Technical and anatomical considerations. Circulation 1977;56:1975–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Elliot LP, Bargeron LM, Jr, Bream PR, et al. Axial cineangiography in congenital heart disease. Section II: Specific lesions. Circulation 1977;56:1084–1093Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fellows KE, Keane JF, Freed MD. Angled views in congenital heart disease. Circulation 1977;56:485–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Freedom RM, Mawson JB, Yoo SJ, et al. Congenital Heart Disease. In: Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Company, Inc., 1997: 1–662. vol 1).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mandell VS, Lock JE, E MJ, et al. The “laidback” aortogram: an improved angiographic view for demonstration of coronary arteries in transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:1379–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yoo SJ, Burrows PE, Moes CAF, et al. Evaluation of cornary arterial patterns in complete transposition by laid-back aortography. Cardiol Young 1996;6:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alpert BS, Culham JAG. A severe complication of pulmonary vein angiography. Brit Heart J 1979;41:727–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Formanek A, Nath PH, Zollikofer C, et al. Selective coronary arteriography in children. Circulation 1980;61:84–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taylor Chung
  • Patricia E. Burrows

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations