Assessment of Vascular Patients and Indications for Therapy

  • Christian de Virgilio

Abstract

Evaluation of the vascular patient requires a systematic approach that begins with the history and physical examination, generally followed by noninvasive studies to obtain a more quantitative estimation of the degree of vascular compromise. The decision to perform more invasive studies or to proceed to endovascular therapy must be individualized but is dependent in large part on the findings of the history, physical examination, and noninvasive studies. The following sections outline the principles of vascular patient assessment and the indications for endovascular therapy.

Keywords

Renal Artery Magnetic Resonance Angiography Aortic Aneurysm Renal Artery Stenosis Superficial Femoral Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rutherford R: Evaluation and selection of patients for vascular surgery. In Rutherford R, editor: Vascular surgery, Philadelphia, 1989, Saunders.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rutherford R, Baker JD, Ernst C et al: Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version, J Vasc Surg 26: 517–538, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sumner D: Objective diagnostic techniques: the role of the vascular laboratory. In Rutherford R, editor: Vascular surgery, Philadelphia, 1989, Saunders.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kinney EV, Bandyk DF, Towne JB: The vascular laboratory in clinical care: part I, Surg Rounds September: 765–777, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Osmundson PJ, Rooke TW, Hallett JW: Effect of arterial revascularization on transcutaneous oxygen tension of the ischemic extremity, Mayo Clin Proc 63: 897–902, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    White RA, Nolan L, Harley D et al: Noninvasive evaluation of peripheral vascular disease using transcutaneous oxygen tension, Am J Surg 144: 68, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cina C, Kastamouris A, Megerman J et al: Utility of transcutaneous oxygen tension measurements in peripheral arterial occlusive disease, J Vasc Surg 1: 362–369, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zierler RE: Physiologic basis of hemodynamic measurement. In White R, Hollier L, editors: Vascular surgery: basic science and clinical corre lations, Philadelphia, 1994, Lippincott.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dougherty MJ, Hallett JW Jr, Naessens JM et al: Optimizing technical success of renal revascu larization: the impact of intraoperative colorflow duplex ultrasonography, J Vasc Surg 17: 849–857, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bandyk DF, Mills JL, Gahtan V et al: Intraoperative duplex scanning of arterial reconstructions: fate of repaired and unrepaired defects, J Vasc Surg 20: 426–433, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Virgilio C, Gloviczki P, Cherry K et al: Renal artery anomalies in patients with horseshoe and ectopic kidneys: the challenge of aortic recon struction, Cardiovasc Surg 4: 413–420, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donayre C, Ivancev K, White R: Patient selection and preoperative assessment. In Chuter T, Donayre C, White R, editors: Endoluminal vas cular prostheses, Boston, 1995, Little Brown.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bleiweis MS, Greorgiou D, Milliken JC et al: Ultrafast computed tomography of the heart and great vessels. In Cavaye DM, White RA, editors: A text and atlas of arterial imaging,London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thompson BH, Stanford W: Electron beam corn puted tomographic imaging of aortic aneurysms and dissections, J Invas Cardiol 6: 213–227, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rubin GD, Walker PJ, Dake MD et al: Three-dimensional spiral computed tomographic angiography: an alternative imaging modality for the abdominal aorta and its branches, J Vasc Surg 18: 656–665, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farrugia E, King BF, Larson TS: Magnetic resonance angiography and detection of renal artery stenosis in a patient with impaired renal function, Mayo Clin Proc 68: 157–160, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cambria R, Yucel E, Brewster D et al: The potential of lower extremity revascularization without contrast arteriography: experience with magnetic resonance angiography, J Vasc Surg 17: 1050–1057, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Owens R, Carpenter J, Baum R et al: Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral occlusive disease, N Engl J Med 326: 1577–1581, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Holland GA et al: Peripheral vascular surgery with magnetic resonance angiography as the sole preoperative imaging modality, J Vasc Surg 20: 861–871, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walsh DB, Cronenwett JL: Natural history of atherosclerosis in the lower extremity, carotid, and coronary circulations. In White RA, Hollier LH, editors: Vascular surgery: basic science and clinical correlations, Philadelphia, 1994, Lippincott, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jelnes R, Gaardsting O, Jensen KH et al: Fate in intermittent claudication: outcome and risk factors, BMJ 293: 1137, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Riordan DS, O’Donnell JA: Realistic expectations for the patient with intermittent claudication, Br J Surg 78: 861, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian de Virgilio

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations