An Economic Definition of the City

  • Catherine Baumont
  • Hubert Beguin
  • Jean-Marie Huriot
Part of the Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics book series (ASTA, volume 35)

Abstract

Cities are a universal phenomenon which first appeared at several points around the planet after the Neolithic revolution (Bairoch, 1985) before spreading worldwide, growing and changing. The city-states of the ancient world, the fortified cities of the Middle Ages, the industrial cities of the 19th century and the world metropolises of the end of this millennium with their immense diversity of shape, function and development, all go by the name of city. But just what are these cities that so attract people, that fascinate and frighten, that bring progress but also nuisances, that nowadays group together the greater proportion of the world’s population and the bulk of economic and cultural output? Beyond the simple fact that human societies have become urbanized, and because of the very scope and diversity of the process, there is a need for theoretical reflection if we want to understand and master the city. But understanding the city means identifying it first.

Keywords

Urban Economic Agglomeration Economy Collective Good Spatial Concentration Agglomeration Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur, W.B. (1990). “Silicon valley locational clusters: when do increasing returns imply monopoly?” Mathematical Social Science, 19, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailly, A., C. Baumont, J.-M. Huriot, and A. Saliez. (1995). Représenter la Ville. Paris: Economica (Géopoche).Google Scholar
  3. Bairoch, P. (1985). De Jericho à Mexico — Villes et Économie dans L’histoire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  4. Baumont, C. (1997). “Croissance endogène des régions et espace.” In L’intégration Régionale des Espaces, edited by F. Célimène and C. Lacour, pp. 33–61. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  5. Baumont, C., R. Guillain and J.-M. Huriot. (1997). “Proximités et formation des villes: le rôle des externalités d’information.” In Proximités Urbaines, edited by J.-M. Huriot. Cahier du PIR-Villes, Paris, Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
  6. Baumont, C. and J.-M. Huriot (1996a). “La ville et ses représentations formelles.” In Penser la Ville. Théories et Modèles, edited by P.-H. Derycke, J.-M. Huriot, and D. Pumain, pp.7–51. Paris: Anthropos (Collection Villes).Google Scholar
  7. Baumont, C. and J-M. Huriot. (1996b). Modèles d’agglomération et ville, Annual Meeting of the Western Regional Science Association, February 26-28.Google Scholar
  8. Baumont, C. J.-M. Huriot. (1997). “La ville, la raison et le rêve: entre théorie et utopie.” L’espace Géographique, 2, 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beguin, H. (1996). “Faut-il définir la ville?” In Penser la ville. Théories et Modèles, edited by P.-H. Derycke, J.-M. Huriot, and D. Pumain, pp. 301–320. Paris: Anthropos (Collection Villes).Google Scholar
  10. Beguin, H. and J.-F. Thisse. (1979). “An axiomatic approach to geographical space.” Geographical Analysis, II, 4, 325–341.Google Scholar
  11. Brunet, R., R. Ferras, and H. Théry. (1992). Les Mots de la Géographie. Paris: Reclus-La Documentation Française.Google Scholar
  12. Cappellin, R. (1988). “Transaction costs and urban agglomeration.” Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 2, 261–278.Google Scholar
  13. Claval, P. (1968). “La théorie des villes.” Revue Géographique de l’Est, 1-2, reprinted in M. Roncayolo and T. Paquot. 1992. Villes et Civilisation Urbaine — XVIIIe-XXe Siècle, 195–222. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
  14. Duby, G. (1980). Histoire de la France Urbaine, Paris, Seuil, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  15. Fouchier, V. (1994). “Penser la densité.” Etudes Foncières, 64, 7–12.Google Scholar
  16. Foulquié, P. (1962). Dictionnaire de la langue philosophique, Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  17. François, N., P. Frankhauser P. Pumain, and Pumain D. (1995). “Villes, densité et fractalité.” Les Annales de le Recherche Urbaine, 67, 55–64.Google Scholar
  18. Frankhauser, P. (1994). La Fractalité des Structures Urbaines, Paris: Anthropos (Collection Villes).Google Scholar
  19. Fujita, M. (1989). Urban Economic Theory — Land Use and City Size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujita, M. and P. Krugman. (1995). “When is economy monocentric? Von Thünen and Chamberlin unified.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fujita, M. and H. Ogawa. (1982). “Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configuration.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12, 161–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujita, M. and J.-F. Thisse. (1997). “Economics of agglomeration.” In Economics of Cities, edited by J.-M. Huriot and J.-F. Thisse. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  23. Glaeser, E.L. (1994). “Economic Growth and Urban Density: a Review Essay.” Working Paper No. E-94-7, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  24. Goffette-Nagot, F. (1996). “Un modèle radioconcentrique pour l’analyse des espaces ruraux périurbains.” Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 4, 813–832.Google Scholar
  25. Gottmann, J. (1962). “Mégalopolis, région-laboratoire de l’urbanisme moderne.” Les cahiers de la République, 7, 46, reprinted inGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Roncayolo and T. Paquot. 1992. Villes et Civilisation Urbaine — XVIIIe-XXe siècle, pp. 587–592. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
  27. Huriot, J.-M., ed. (1997). Proximités Urbaines. Cahier du PIR-Villes, Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
  28. Huriot, J.-M. and J. Perreur. (1994). “La centralité.” In Encyclopédie d’économie Spatiale, edited by J.-P Auray, A. Bailly, P.-H. Derycke P.-H., and J.-M. Huriot, pp. 47–53. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  29. Kerbat, M.-C. (1995). Leçon Littéraire sur la Ville. Paris: PUF (Collection Major).Google Scholar
  30. Krugman, P. (1991). “Increasing returns and economic geography.” Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krugman, P. (1993a). “First nature, second nature and metropolitan location.” Journal of Regional Science, 33, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krugman, P. (1993b). “On the relationship between trade theory and location theory.” Review of International Economics, 1, 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, 1st ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Mumford, L. (1961). The City in History. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  35. Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic Theory and Under-Developed Regions. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  36. Papageorgiou, Y.Y. (1983). “Models of agglomeration.” Systemi Urbani, 3, 391–410.Google Scholar
  37. Papageorgiou, G.J. and T. Smith. (1983). “Agglomeration as local instability of spatially uniform steadystates.” Econometrica, 51, 1109–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pumain, D. (1994). “Villes et agglomérations urbaines.” In Encyclopédie d’économie Spatiale, edited by J.-P. Auray, A Bailly, P.-H. Derycke, and J.-M. Huriot, pp.111–125. Paris: Economica (Bibliothèque de Science Régionale).Google Scholar
  39. Pumain, D. and M.-C. Robic. (1996). “Théoriser la ville.” In Penser la Ville. Théories et Modèles, edited by P.-H. Derycke, J.-M. Huriot, D. Pumain D., 107–161. Paris: Anthropos (Collection Villes).Google Scholar
  40. Reclus, E. (1895). “The Evolution of cities.” Contemporary Review, French translation reprinted in Roncayolo M., Paquot T., 1992, Villes et Civilisation Urbaine — XVIIIe-XXe Siècle, 158–173. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
  41. Serre, M. (1993). La Légende des Anges. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  42. Valéry, P. (1973). Cahiers. Paris: Gallimard (Bibliothèque de la Pléiade).Google Scholar
  43. Verhaeren, E. (1895). Les Villes Tentaculaires, reprinted in Verhaeren E., 1982, Les Campagnes Hallucinées — Les Villes tentaculaires, Paris, Gallimard.Google Scholar
  44. Weber, A (1909). Uber den Standort der Industrien, Tübingen, Verlag Mohr, English translationGoogle Scholar
  45. C.J. Friedrich, (1929–1957), Alfred Weber’s Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wirth, L. (1938). “Le phénomène urbain comme mode de vie.” In M. Roncayolo and T. Paquot, 1992, Villes et Civilisation Urbaine — XVIIIe-XXe Siècle, 312–326. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Baumont
  • Hubert Beguin
  • Jean-Marie Huriot

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations