Relative Efficiency of Intermunicipal Provision

  • Peter B. Boorsma
  • Piet de Vries
Chapter

Abstract

The intermunicipal arrangement is one of the opportunities municipalities can use to redece their budget problems. Intermunicipal arrangements, privatizing activities, such as contracting out, and straightforward budget cuts were popular instruments used in response to the fiscal squeeze during the ‘eighties. It is conceivable that the establishment of such an intercommunal arrangement is preferred for ideological reasons. The intercommunal arrangement might be an alternative to contracting out to a private firm. In this way the intercommunal is an option to maintain public employment. In the Netherlands the establishment of intermunicipal arrangements has been stimulated by the Act on Intercommunal Arrangements (Wet Gemeenschap-pelijke Regelingen [WGR], 1950, revised 1975/85)1.

Keywords

Relative Efficiency Moral Hazard Private Firm Adverse Selection Public Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agranoff, R.J. Intergovernmental Management. New York: State University of New York Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Ahw, R.Y. Micro-economics: Theory and Application, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. Alchian, A.A., H. Demsetz. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. American Economic Review 1972;62: 777–795.Google Scholar
  4. Averch, H., L.L. Johnson. Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint. American Economic Review 1962;52:1052–1069.Google Scholar
  5. Bamberg, G., K. Spremann. eds. “Agency Theory, Information and Incentives.” In Contract, Agency, and the Delegation of Decision Making, E. Schanze, Berlin: Springer Verlag, p. 461–472,1989.Google Scholar
  6. Boorsma, P.B. Sanering in de collectieve sector (Cutting down Public Expenditure), Enschede, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Boorsma, P. B. Privatisering van overheidstaken (Privatizing Public Tasks). De Naamloze Vennootschap 1982a;1982.Google Scholar
  8. Boorsma, Peter B. Public Sector Productivity and Relative Efficiency. Paper presented at the 38th Congress of International Institute of Public Finance, Copenhagen, 1982b.Google Scholar
  9. Boorsma P.B. Privatization, Two Conceptual Frameworks. Paper delivered at the 59th Annual Conference of the Southern Economic Association, Orlando, Fl, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Boorsma, P.B. “Privatization: Policital and economic Considerations.” In Privatization Experiences in African and Asian Countries, M.P. van Dijk, N.G. Schulte Nordholt, eds. SISWO: Amsterdam, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. Boorsma, P. B., R.W. Künneke. “Relative efficiency of Various Public Organizations: Terra Incognita?” In Public Finance and Performance of Enterprises, Manfred Neumann, K. W. Roskamp, eds. Proceedings of the 43rd Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance, Paris, 1987, Detroit, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. Boorsma, P.B., De Vries, P. Samenwerkingsvormen in de overheidspraktijk: publiek- of privaatrechtelijk? Vereniging Nederlandse Gemeenten: Den Haag, 1986.Google Scholar
  13. Boorsma, P.B., Mol, N.P. Privatisering, Scheveningen, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. Borcherding, T.E., W.W. Pommerehne, F. Schneider. “Comparing the Efficiency of Private and Public Production: the Evidence from Five Countries.” In: Public Production, Zeitschrift fur National Ökonomie, Supple-mentum2, Dieter B., R.A. Musgrave, J. Wiseman, eds. Springer Verlag: Wien-New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. Fare, R., G. Grosskopf, I. Logan. The Relative Performance of Publicly Owned and Privately Owned Electric Utilities. Journal of Public Economics 1985;26:89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gage, R.W., M.P. Mandell, eds. Strategies for Managing Intergovernmental Policies and Networks. New York: Prager, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. Le Grand J., R. Robinson, eds. Privatisation and the Welfare State. London, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. Hansmann, H.B. “Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organization”. In The Nonprofit Sector, A Research Handbook, W.W. Powell, ed. New Haven, 1987.Google Scholar
  19. Hatry, H.P. A Review of Private Approaches for Delivery of Public Services. Washington D.C., 1983.Google Scholar
  20. Porter, P.K., S.W. Scully. Economic Efficiency in Cooperatives. Journal of Law and Economics, 1987.Google Scholar
  21. Wolf Jr., Ch. A Theory of Non-Market Failure: Framework for Implementation Analysis. Journal of Law and Economics, 1979;22:17–138.Google Scholar
  22. Wright, D.S. Understanding Intergovernmental Relations. 2nd edition, Monterey, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company Institute: Washington D.C., 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter B. Boorsma
  • Piet de Vries

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations