The Partial Credit Model

  • Geofferey N. Masters
  • Benjamin D. Wright
Chapter

Abstract

The Partial Credit Model (PCM) is a unidimensional model for the analysis of responses recorded in two or more ordered categories. In this sense, the model is designed for the same purpose as several other models in this book, including Samejima’s graded response model (Samejima, 1969). The PCM differs from the graded response model, however, in that it belongs to the Rasch family of models and so shares the distinguishing characteristics of that family: separable person and item parameters, sufficient statistics, and, hence, conjoint additivity. These features enable “specifically objective” comparisons of persons and items (Rasch, 1977) and allow each set of model parameters to be conditioned out of the estimation procedure for the other.

Keywords

Item Parameter Partial Credit Item Response Model Partial Credit Model Grade Response Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, R.J. (1988). Applying the PCM to educational diagnosis. Applied Measurement in Education 4, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R.J., Doig, B.A., and Rosier, M.R. (1991). Science Learning in Victorian Schools: 1990 (Monograph 41 ). Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, R.J., Griffin, P.E., and Martin, L. (1987). A latent trait method for measuring a dimension in second language proficiency. Language Testing 4, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, R.J. and Khoo, S.T. (1992). QUEST: The Interactive Test Analysis System. Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  5. Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43, 561-–573.Google Scholar
  6. Bock, R.D. and Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika 46, 443–459.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doig, B.A., Mellor, S., Piper, K., and Masters, G.N. (1994). Conceptual Understanding in Social Education. Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, A.L. and Thurstone, L.L. (1952). An internal consistency check for scale values determined by the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika 17, 169-–180.Google Scholar
  9. Glas, C.A.W. (1988). The derivation of some tests for the Rasch modelGoogle Scholar
  10. from the multinomial distribution. Psychometrika 53 525–546.Google Scholar
  11. Glas, C.A.W. and Verhelst, N.D. (1989). Extensions of the PCM. Psychometrika 53, 525–-546.Google Scholar
  12. Guthke, J., Wolschke, P., Willmes, K., and Huber, W. (1992). Leipziger Lerntest - Diagnostisches Programm zum begriffsanalogen Klassifizieren (DP-BAK). Aufbau und Konstruktionseigenschaften. Heilpaedagogische Forschung 18, 153–161.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, J. Laan, S., and Mossenson, L.T. (1988). Applying partial credit analysis to the construction of narrative writing tests. Applied Measurement in Education 4, 335–346.Google Scholar
  14. Julian, E.R. and Wright, B.D. (1988). Using computerized patient simulations to measure the clinical competence of physicians. Applied Measurement in Education 4, 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelderman, H. (1984). Loglinear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika 49, 223–245.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koch, W.R. and Dodd, B.G. (1989). An investigation of procedures for computerized adaptive testing using partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education 2, 335-–357.Google Scholar
  17. Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 47, 149–174.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masters, G.N. (1984). Constructing an item bank using partial credit scoring. Journal of Educational Measurement 21, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Masters, G.N. (1985). A comparison of latent trait and latent class analyses of Likert-type data. Psychometrika 50, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masters, G.N. (1987). Measurement models for ordered response categories. In R. Langeheine and J. Rost (Eds.). Latent Trait and Latent Class Models (pp. 11–29 ). New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  21. Masters, G.N. (1988a), Partial credit models. In J.P. Keeves (Ed.). Educational Research Methodology, Measurement and Evaluation (pp. 292296 ). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Masters, G.N. (1988b). The analysis of partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education 1, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Masters, G.N. and Evans, J. (1986). Banking non-dichotomously scored items. Applied Psychological Measurement 10, 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masters, G.N. and Mislevy, R. (1993). New views of student learning: Implications for educational measurement. In N. Frederiksen, R.J. Mislevy, and I.I. Begar (Eds.). Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests (pp. 219–242 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Masters, G.N. and Wright, B.D. (1982). Defining a fear-of-crime variable: A comparison of two Rasch models. Education Research and Perspectives 9, 18–32.Google Scholar
  26. Masters, G.N. and Wright, B.D. (1984). The essential process in a family of measurement models. Psychometrika 49, 529–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Molenaar, I W (1983). Some improved diagnostics for failure of the Rasch model. Psychometrika 48, 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement 16, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pennings, A. (1987). The Diagnostic Embedded Figures Test. Paper presented at the Second Conference on Learning and Instruction of the European Association of Learning and Instruction, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
  30. Pollitt, A. and Hutchinson, C. (1987). Calibrating graded assessments: Rasch partial credit analysis of performance in writing. Language Testing 4, 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Denmarks Paedagogiske Institut.Google Scholar
  32. Rasch, G. (1977). On specific objectivity: An attempt at formalizing the request for generality and validity of scientific statements. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 14, 58–94.Google Scholar
  33. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, Monograph Supplement No. 17.Google Scholar
  34. Thurstone, L.L. (1931). Measurement of social attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 26, 249–-269.Google Scholar
  35. Titmanis, P., Murphy, F., Cook, J., Brady, K., and Brown, M. (1993). Profiles of Student Achievement: English and Mathematics in Western Australian Government Schools, 1992. Perth: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  36. Van den Wollenberg, A.L. (1982). Two new test statistics for the Rasch model. Psychometrika 47, 123–140.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Willmes, K. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of neuropsychological test performances. In N. von Steinbuechel, D.Y. von Cramon, and E. Poeppel (Eds.) Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (pp. 103–113 ). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson, M.R. (1992). The ordered partition model: An extension of the PCM. Applied Psychological Measurement 16, 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, M.R. and Adams, R.J. (1993). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the partial order model. Journal of Educational Statistics 18, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson, M. and Iventosch, L. (1988). Using the PCM to investigate responses to structured subtests. Applied Measurement in Education 1, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson, M. and Masters, G.N. (1993). The PCM and null categories. Psychometrika 58, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wright, B.D. and Linacre, J.M. (1992). BIGSTEPS Rasch Analysis Computer Program. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, B.D. and Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago: MESA Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geofferey N. Masters
  • Benjamin D. Wright

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations