Programmed Monitoring and Digital System Simulation

  • Philip A. Wilsey
  • Ranga Vemuri
  • Peter J. Ashenden
  • Norman E. Mause
Part of the Current Issues in Electronic Modeling book series (CIEM, volume 8)

Abstract

Digital system simulators play an important role in the design and analysis of digital systems. Traditionally, the simulator user-interface provides little more than the ability to set breakpoints, advance the simulation to a particular future (simulation) time, and examine, set and trace data values. In this chapter, the ability to perform simulation time data analysis is examined. In particular, an ability to attach precompiled simulation time monitors is considered. Three approaches for the insertion of these monitors are introduced. Finally, several example scenarios of monitor use in digital system simulation are presented.

Keywords

Digital System Memory Reference Hardware Description Language Abstract Data Type Monitoring Software 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Z. Aral and I. Gertner, “Non-intrusive and interactive profiling in Parasight,” ACMSIGPLAN Notices, 23(9):21–30, September 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Z. Aral and I. Gertner, “High-level debugging in Parasight, ”ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 24(1):151–162, January. 1989.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. J. Ashenden, “Teaching computer architecture using VHDL,” In VHDL International Users’ Forum (VIUF), pages 203–211. VHDL International, October 1993.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. M. Augustin, D. C. Luckham, B. A. Gennart, Y. Huh, and A. G. Stanculescu, Hardware Design and Simulation in VAL/VHDL, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1991.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. C. Charlton, P. H. Leng, and D. M. Wilkinson, “Program monitoring and analysis: Software structures and architectural support”, Software—Practice and Experience, 20(9):859–867, September 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Ducassé, “Opium+, a meta-debugger for Prolog,” In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 272–277, Munich, August 1988.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Ducassé and A.-M. Emde, “Opium: A debugging environment for Prolog development and debugging research,” ACM Software Engineering Notes, 16(1):54–59, January 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Garcia-Molina, F. Germano, and W. H. Kohler, “Debugging a distributed computing system,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-10(2):210–219, March 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. C. Huang, “Program instrumentation and software testing”, IEEE Computer, 11(4):25–32, April 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Intermetrics, Bethesda, MD, VHDL Design Environment (VDE) User’s Manual, version 3.0 (unix) edition, December 1990.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. D. Jordan, B. B. Popli, and R. M. Apte, “ILS Interactive Logic Simulator,” In Proceedings of the 20th Design Automation Conference, pages 719–720, June 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. A. Kearney, “DECSIM: A multi-level simulation system for digital design,” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design, pages 206–209, October 1984.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. Ku and G. De Micheli, “Hardware C: A language for hardware design,” Technical Report CSL-TR-90–419, Computer System Laboratory, Stanford University, August 1990. (Version 2.0).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    H. E. Kulsrud, “Extending the interactive debugging system Helper,” In R. Rustin, editor, Debugging Techniques in Large Systems, pages 77–91. Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. J. LeBlanc and J. M. Mellor-Crummey, “Debugging parallel programs with Instant Replay,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-36(4):471–482, April 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    N. Mause, “Abstract data types in the VHDL description and simulation environments,” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Univ. of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. K. Morison, N. E. Peeling, and T. L. Thorp, “The design rational of ELLA, a hardware design and description language, ”Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Computer Hardware Description Languages, pages 303–320, Aug. 1985.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. Notkin and W. G. Griswold, “Enhancement through extension: The extension interpreter,” ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 22(7):45–55, July 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    D. M. Ogle, K. Schwan, and R. Snodgrass, “The dynamic monitoring of realtime distributed and parallel systems,” Technical Report GIT—ICS-90/23, School of Information and Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, May 1990.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. A. Patterson and J. L. Hennessey, Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, San Mateo, CA, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    D. L. Perry, VHDL, McGraw—Hill, New York, NY, 2nd edition, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    B. Plattner and J. Nievergelt, “Monitoring program execution: A survey,” IEEE Computer, 14(11):76–93, November 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    R. L. Probert, “Optimal insertion of software probes in well-delimited programs,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE -8(1):34–42, January 1982.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    R. D. Schiffenbauer, “Interactive debugging in a distributed computational environment,” Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, September 1981. MIT/LCS/TR-264.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    W. Sherwood, “An interactive simulation debugging interface for CHDL’s,” In M. Brewer and R. Hartenstein, editors, Computer Hardware Description Languages and their Applications, pages 137–144, Amsterdam, September 1981. North-Holland.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    F. van der Linden and I. Wilson, “An interactive debugging environment,” IEEE Micro, 18(8):18–31, August 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Vantage Analysis Systems, Vantage Spreadsheet User’s Guide, Volume I, document number 003, December 1990.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    P. A. Wilsey, N. Mause, and P. J. Ashenden, “Abstract data types and the digital system description and simulation environments, ”Current Issues in Electronic Modeling, vol 5: Hardware Component Modeling, pages 33–53, March 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip A. Wilsey
    • 1
  • Ranga Vemuri
    • 1
  • Peter J. Ashenden
    • 2
  • Norman E. Mause
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of ECECSThe University of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer ScienceThe University of AdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Symbios Logic, Inc.Fort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations