Coding and Modulation for the Fading Channel

  • Ezio Biglieri
  • Giuseppe Caire
  • Giorgio Taricco
Chapter

Abstract

On fading channels the coding/modulation (C/M) paradigms developed for the Gaussian channel may not be valid anymore. For example, coded modulation schemes optimized for the independent Rayleigh channel do not attempt at maximizing the minimum Euclidean distance among error events, but rather their Hamming distance.

The channel model turns out to have out to have a considerable impact on the choice of the preferred solution for C/M. Moreover, if the channel mmodel is uncertain, or not stable enough in time to design a C/M scheme closely matched to it, then the best proposition may be that of a “robust” Solution, that is one that provides good performance in a wide variety fo fading environments.

In this xontribution we review a few important issues in C/M for the fading channel. By focusing our attention on the flat, independent Rayleigh fading channel, we discuss how some design criteria valid for the Gaussiann channel should be modified.

Keywords

Fading Channel Channel State Information Rayleigh Fading Channel Turbo Code Convolutional Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E. Biglieri, M. Di Sciuva and V. Zingarelli, “Modulation and coding for mobile radio communications: Channel with correlated Rice fading and Doppler frequency shift,” IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology, to be published, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. Caire, G. Taricco, and E. Biglieri, “Bit-interleaved coded modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, to be published, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    S. A. Al-Semari and T. Fuja, “Bit interleaved I-Q TCM,” ISITA ‘86, Victoria, B.C., September 17–20, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    E. Biglieri, G. Caire, and G. Taricco, “Error probability over fading channels: A unified approach,” European Transactions on Telecommunications,1997, to be published.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. Biglieri, D. Divsalar, P. J. McLane, and M. K. Simon, Introduction to Trellis-Coded Modulation with Applications, New York: MacMillan, 1991.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Boutros, E. Viterbo, C. Rastello, and J.-C. Belfiore, “Good lattice constellations for both Rayleigh fading and Gaussian channels,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol 42, no. 2, pp. 502–518, March 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Caire and G. Lechner, “Turbo-codes with Unequal Error Protection IEE Electronics Letters, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 629, March 1996.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Caire, J. Ventura, and E. Biglieri, “Coded and Pragmatic-Coded Orthogonal Modulation for the Fading Channel with Non-Coherent Detection,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’95), Seattle (WA), June 18–22, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Ericson, “A Gaussian channel with slow fading,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. 16, pp. 353–355, May 1970.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Hagenauer, “Zur Kanalkapazität bei Nachrichtenkanälen mit Fading und gebündelten Fehlern,” AEU, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 229–237, June 1980.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. H. Jamali and T. Le-Ngoc, Coded-Modulation Techniques for Fading Channels. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. Berrou and A. Glavieux, “Near optimum error correcting coding and decoding: Turbo-codes,” IEEE Trans. Communications, Vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 1261–1271, October 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Steiner, “The strong simplex conjecture is false,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, pp. 721–731, May 1994.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    G. Ungerboeck, “Channel coding with multilevel/phase signals”, IEEE Trans. Inform. Th, vol. IT-28, pp. 56–67, Jan. 1982.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Ventura-Traveset, G. Caire, E. Biglieri, and G. Taricco, “Impact of diversity reception on fading channels with coded modulation—Part I: Coherent detection,” IEEE Trans. Commun, Vol. 45, No. 5, May 1997.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Ventura-Traveset, G. Caire, E. Biglieri, and G. Taricco, “Impact of diversity reception on fading channels with coded modulation—Part II: Differential block detection,” IEEE Trans. Commun, Vol. 45, No. 6, June 1997.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. Ventura-Traveset, G. Caire, E. Biglieri, and G. Taricco, “Impact of diversity reception on fading channels with coded modulation—Part III: Co-channel interference,” IEEE Trans. Commun, Vol. 45, No. 7, July 1997.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    N. Seshadri and C.-E. W. Sundberg, “Coded modulations for fading channels—An overview,” European Trans. Telecomm, Vol. ET-4, No. 3, pp. 309–324, May-June 1993.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. J. Viterbi, J. K. Wolf, E. Zehavi, and R.. Padovani, “A pragmatic approach to trellis-coded modulation,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 27, n. 7, pp. 11–19, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    E. Zehavi, “8-PSK Trellis Codes for a Rayleigh Channel,” IEEE Trans. on Commun, vol 40, no. 5, pp. 873–884, May 1992.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ezio Biglieri
  • Giuseppe Caire
  • Giorgio Taricco

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations