Language: Being Fluid

  • Michael Alley

Abstract

Many scientists and engineers mistakenly believe that scientific writing must be dull. Unfortunately, their writing reflects that misconception. It is dull, needlessly dull. Many scientists and engineers undercut the purpose of scientific writing—to inform—with sentences and paragraphs that drag and with discontinuities in language that trip readers. Scientists and engineers study the most fascinating subjects in the world: solar systems, animal and plant kingdoms, the inner workings of atoms and nuclei. Why then do so many scientists and engineers resign themselves to prose styles that are sluggish, that are without life?

Keywords

Sentence Length Prepositional Phrase Scientific Writing Sentence Opener Volcanic Explosion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eichelberger, J. C, “Modeling Mount St. Helens Volcanic Eruption,” Sandia Technology, vol. 7, no. 2 (June 1983), p. 3.Google Scholar
  2. Kunhardt, E. E., and W. W. Byszewski, “Development of Overvolt-age Breakdown at High Pressure,” Physical Review A, vol. 21, no. 6 (1980), pp. 2069–72.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Margolis, S. B., and R. C. Armstrong, “Two Asymptotic Models for Solid Propellant Combustion,” Sandia Combustion Research Program Annual Report (Livermore, CA: Sandia National Laboratories, 1985), chap. 5, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
  4. Saarinen, T. F., and J. L. Sell, Warning and Response to the Mount St. Helens Eruption (Albany: State University of New York, 1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Alley
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Computer EngineeringVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations