Off-Exchange Derivatives Markets and Financial Fragility

  • Franklin R. Edwards
Chapter
Part of the Financial and Monetary Policy Studies book series (FMPS, volume 30)

Abstract

Huge losses suffered by users of off-exchange (or OTC) derivatives have created widespread concern that derivatives may be undermining the stability of financial markets. During the last 12 months alone companies have reported losing more than $10 billion on derivatives investments. A prime example is Metallgesellschaft A.G. (MG), Germany’s 14th largest industrial firm corporation, which reported losses of almost $1.5 billion as a result of a hedging strategy gone sour.1 Only a massive $1.9 billion rescue operation by 150 German and international banks kept MG from going into bankruptcy. While MG did not default on its futures or swap obligations, had it done so the ramifications for some major international banks and for OTC derivatives markets in general may have been far-reaching. Substantial losses also have been reported by other large firms and investment funds: Orange County California ($1.5 billion), Showa Shell Sekiyu ($1.5 billion), Kash-ima Oil ($1.4 billion), Pacific Horizon Funds of Bank of America ($167.9 million), Procter & Gamble ($157 million), Air Products and Chemicals ($113 million), and Gibson Greetings ($19.7 million), to name just a few.2 These incidents have left the clear impression that even sophisticated firms may not appreciate the potential risks associated with using derivatives, and that derivatives-related losses can be large enough to impair the solvency of even sizeable firms.

Keywords

Credit Risk Energy Price Supervisory Board Derivative Market Derivative Position 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Affidavit of W. Arthur Benson. W. Arthur Benson v. Metallgesellschaft Corp. et al. U.S.D.C. Maryland, Civil Action No. JFM-94–484, filed October 13, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Bank for International Settlements. Recent Developments in International Interbank Relations. Working Paper of Central Banks for the Group of Ten Countries, October, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. Black, Bernard S. “The Value of Institutional Investor Monitoring: The Empirical Evidence.” UCLA Law Review 39 (1992), 896–933Google Scholar
  4. Central Banks of the Group of Ten Countries. “Public Disclosure of Markets and Credit Risks by Financial Intermediaries.” Euro-currency Standing Committee Discussion Paper, September, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. Culp, Christopher, and Steve Hanke. “Derivative Dingbats.” International Economy 8(4)(July/August 1994 ).Google Scholar
  6. Culp, Christopher L., and Merton H. Miller. “Hedging a Flow of Commodity Deliveries with Futures: Lessons from Metallgesellschaft.” Derivatives Quarterly 1(1)(1994a). Google Scholar
  7. Culp, Christopher L., and Merton H. Miller. “Metallgesellschaft and the Economics of Synthetic Storage.” Mimeo, December 13, 1994b; Journal of Applied Corporate Finance (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  8. Eckhardt, Jens, and Thomas Knipp. “Metallgesellschaft: Neue Probleme in den USA.” Handelsblatt, November 4, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, Franklin R. “Financial Markets and Managerial Myopia: Making America More Competitive.” In: George Kaufman, ed., Reforming Financial Markets and Institutions in the United States. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1993.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, Franklin R., and Michael Canter. “The Collapse of Metallgesellschaft: Unhedgeable Risks, Poor Hedging Strategy, or Just Bad Luck?” The Journal of Futures Markets 15 (3) (May 1995).Google Scholar
  11. Edwards, Franklin R., and Cindy W. Ma. Futures and Options New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1992. Euromoney. Ma. Futures and Options New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1992. Euromoney. “Fill That Gap!” August 1994.Google Scholar
  12. Falloon, William. “Triple Whammy.” Energy Risk I (4)(May 1994 ).Google Scholar
  13. Financial Accounting Standards Board. “Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards: Disclosure of Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” Financial Accounting Series No. 136-B, April 1994.Google Scholar
  14. Fons, Jerome S. “Using Default Rates to Model the Term Structure of Credit Risk.” Financial Analysts Journal (September/October 1994 ).Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, Alan. “Deutsche Bank Fights Back to Save Reputation.” Herald Tribune, December 5, 1994. Gibson, R., and E.S, Schwartz. “Stochastic Convenience Yield and the Pricing of Oil Contingent Claims.” The Journal of Finance 45 (1990), 959–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Group of Thirty. “Derivatives: Practices and Principles.” Overview of Derivatives Activity, July 1993, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. How a Former Banker Took a German Giant to the Cleaners.“ Global Finance,November 1994.Google Scholar
  18. Kollar, Mark. “Congressman Sees Need for Safety Net.” Knight-Ridder Financial Products & News, July/August 1994.Google Scholar
  19. Knight-Ridder Money Center. “Benson’s Billion Dollar Lawsuit vs. MG Seen Hinging on Accounting.” News No. 14149, March 11, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Metallgesellschaft Woes Put Spotlight on Two-tier Boards.“ Director’s Monthly,Boardroom News, August 27, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, Karen Lowry. “I Came, I Saw, I Conquered.” Business Week 58, July 4.Google Scholar
  22. MRC Oil Division Retainer Fax. Ref. 43/93, December 30, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. New Shadows Hang Over the Crisis Management.“ Handelsbatt, October 22/23, 1994.Google Scholar
  24. Parkes, Christopher. “Metallgesellschaft Stuns Banks with Loss Near DM 2bn.” Financial Times, January 6, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. Protzman, Ferdinand. “When German Safeguards Fail.” New York Times, February 28, 1994.Google Scholar
  26. Roe, Mark J. “Some Differences in Corporate Structure in Germany, Japan, and the United States.” The Yale Law Journal 102(1993).Google Scholar
  27. Swaps Monitor Publications, Inc. The World’s Major Swap Dealers, November 1992.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, Jeffrey, and Kenneth Bacon. “How the NYMEX Cooled MG’s Oil Crisis.” The Wall Street.loumal, April 5, 1994.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, Jeffrey, and Allanna Sullivan. “German Firm Finds Hedges Can be Thorny.” The Wall Street Journal, January 10, 1994.Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Comptroller of the Currency. Derivative Product Activities od Commerical Banks (Joint study conducted in response to questions posed by Senator Riegle on derivative products). Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 27, 1993.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. General Accounting Office. “Financial Derivatives: Actions Needed to Protect the Financial System.” GAO/GGD-94–133, May 1994.Google Scholar
  32. Waller, David. `German Group Hastens Talks with Bankers.“ Financial Times,December 31, 1993. W. Arthur Benson v. Metallgesellschaft Corp. et al. Civ. Act. No. JFM-94–484, U.S.D.C.D. Md. 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franklin R. Edwards
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of BusinessColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.American Enterprise InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations