Skull and Facial Bone Trauma: Experimental Aspects

  • Douglas L. Allsop

Abstract

Trauma, “a body injury produced by sudden force ,”1 is something that man has had to confront from the beginning of time. Skull and facial trauma has long been a part of war and warring. Early biblical references, such as to David and Goliath,2 and accounts of early man illustrate the severe effects caused by a substantial blow to the head. While interpersonal violence still accounts for a significant portion of head trauma, the invention, development, and use of motor vehicles provides a medium through which a majority of skull and facial trauma occur.3 The leading causes of facial fracture trauma are illustrated in Fig. 11.1.

Keywords

Abbreviate Injury Scale Frontal Bone Zygomatic Arch Facial Fracture Experimental Aspect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Random House Dictionary, Random House, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Old Testament, I Samuel 17:49.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karlson TA (1982) The incidence of hospital-treated facial injuries from vehicles. Trauma 22 (4).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Backaitis SH, Dalmotas DJ. Injury patterns and injury sources of unrestrained and three point belt restrained car occupants in injury producing frontal collisions. 29th AAAM, p 365, October 7–9, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cesari D, Ramet M, Welbourne E. Experimental evaluation of human facial tolerance to injuries. 1989 IRCOBI, Stockholm, Sweden, September 13–15, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Viano DC, Melvin JW, McCleary JD, Madeira RG, Shee TR. Measurement of head dynamics and facial contact forces in the Hybrid III dummy. 30th Stapp, #861891, SAE P-189, p 269, October 27–29, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The abbreviated injury scale. American Association for Automotive Medicine, 1980 revision.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lange WA. Facial Injury, Biomechanics and its applications to automotive design. Society of Automotive Engineers P-49, Warrendale, PA, January 1973.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foster JK, Kortge JO, Wolanin MJ. Hybrid III—a biomechanically-based crash test dummy. 21st Stapp, #770938, p 973, October 19–21, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hubbard RP, McLeod DG. Definition and development of a crash dummy head. 18th Stapp, #741193, p 599, December 4–5, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hodgson VR, Thomas LM. Comparison of head acceleration injury indices in cadaver skull fracture. 15th Stapp, #710854, Coronado, CA, November 17–19, 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grosch L, Katz E, Kassing L, Marwitz H, Zeidler F. New measurement methods to assess the improved protection potential of airbag systems. In Restraint technologies: front seat occupant protection. #870333, SP-690, p 161, February 1987.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newman JA, Gallup BM. Biofidelity improvements to the Hybrid III headform. 28th Stapp, #841659, p 87, November 6–7, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Warner CY, Niven J. A prototype load-sensing dummy faceform test device for facial injury hazard assessment. 23 rd AAAM, p 67, October 3–6, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moulton JR, Warner CY, Meilander H. Design, development and testing of a load-sensing crash dummy face. In advances in belt restraint systems: design, performance and usage. SAE #840397, pp 271–277, February 27-March 2, 1984.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warner CY, Wille MG, Brown SR, Nilsson S, Mellander H. A load sensing face form for automotive collision crash dummy instrumentation. In passenger comfort, convenience and safety: test tools and procedures. #860197, p 85, February 24–28, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Warner CY, Allsop DL, and Wille MG. Surface pressure sensors and ATD application SBIR final report. DOT DTRS-57–86-C-00100, April 1987.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nilsson S, Planath I. Facial injury occurrence in traffic accidents and its detection by a load sensing face. 11th ESV Conference, p 613, May 12, 1987.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nyquist GW, Cavanaugh JM, Goldberg SJ, King AI. Facial impact tolerance and response. 30th Stapp, #861896, SAE P-189, p 379, October 1986.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Allsop DL, Warner CY, Wille MG, Schneider DC, Nahum AM. Facial impact response—a comparison of the Hybrid III dummy and human cadaver. 32nd Stapp, #881719, p 139, October 17–19, 1988.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perl TR, Nilsson S, Planath I, Wille MG. Deformable load sensing Hybrid III face. 33rd Stapp, #892427, p 29, October 4, 1989.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mel vin JW, Shee TR. Facial injury assessment techniques. 12th ESV, Vol 1, May 29-June 1, 1989.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Benson BR, Perl TR, Smith GC, Planath I. Lateral load-sensing Hybrid III head. 35th Stapp, San Diego, CA, November 18–20, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Le Fort R. Etude experimentale sur les fractures de la mâchoire supérieure. Rev Chir 1901(23)-.208, 360, 479.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schneider DC. Biomechanics of facial bone injury: experimental aspects. In the biomechanics of trauma, p 281, Norwalk, Connecticut, 1985.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hodgson VR, Nakamura GS, Talwalker RK. Response of the facial structure to impact. 8th Stapp, p 229, October 21–23, 1964.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hodgson VR, Lange WA, Talwalker RK. Injury to the facial bones. 9th Stapp, p 144, October 20–21, 1965.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hodgson VR (1967) Tolerance of the facial bones to impact, American Journal of Anatomy 120: 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hodgson VR, Patrick LM. Dynamic response of the human cadaver head compared to a simple mathematical model. 12th Stapp, #680784, p 280, October 22–23, 1968.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Swearingen JJ. Tolerances of the human face to crash impact. Office of Aviation Medicine, Federal Aviation Agency, June 1965.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nahum AM, Gatts JD, Gadd CW, Danforth JP. Impact tolerance of the skull and face. 12th Stapp, #680785, p 302, October 22–23, 1968.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schneider DC, Nahum AM. Impact studies of facial bones and skull. 16th Stapp, #720965, p 186, November 8–10, 1972.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Allsop DL. Human facial fracture and compliance. PhD Dissertation. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, December 1989.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Sances A, Myklebust J, Schmaltz D. Steering wheel induced facial trauma. 32nd Stapp, #881712, p 45, October 1988.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoganandan N, Sances A, Pintar F, Harris G, Larson S. Three-dimensional computerized tomography analysis of steering wheel. Dept Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin. Paper presented at 12th ESV, #89–4A-W-020, Gothenberg, Sweden, May 29, 1989.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Welbourne ER, Ramet M, Zarebski M. A comparison of human facial fracture tolerance with the performance of a surrogate test device. 12th ESV, #89–4A-0–004, Gothenberg, Sweden, May 1989.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nahum AM, Ward CC, Raasch FO, Adams S, Schneider DC. Experimental studies of side impact to the human head. 24th Stapp, #801301, Troy, MI, October 15–17, 1980.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nahum AM, Ward CC, Schneider DC, Raasch FO, Adams S. A study of impacts to the lateral protected and unprotected head. 25th Stapp, #811006, San Francisco, CA, September 28–30, 1981.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stalnaker RL, Roberts VL, McElhaney JH. Side impact tolerance to blunt trauma. 17th Stapp, #730979, Oklahoma City, OK, November 12–13, 1973.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Got C, Patel A, Fayon A, Tarriere CH, Walfisch G. Results of experimental head impacts on cadavers: the various data obtained and their relations to some measured physical parameters. 22nd Stapp, #780887, October 24–26, 1978.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Melvin JW, Fuller PM, Daniel RP, Pavliscak GM. Human head and knee tolerance to localized impacts. SAE #690477, May 19–23, 1969.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ono K, Kikuchi A, Kobayashi H, Nakamura N. Human head tolerances to sagittal and lateral impacts—estimation deduced from experimental head injury using subhuman primates and human cadavers skulls. In Head injury prevention past and present research. Wayne State University, Department of Neurosurgery, Detroit, MI, December 4, 1985.Google Scholar
  43. Allsop DL, Perl TR, Warner CY. Force/ deflection and fracture characteristics of the temporo-parietal region of the human head. 35th Stapp, San Diego, CA, November 18–20, 1991.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Culver R, Bender M, Melvin JW. Mechanisms, tolerances and responses obtained under dynamic superior-inferior head impact. Ann Arbor, MI: Highway Safety Research Institute, University of Michigan, UM-HSRI-78–21, PB 229–292, May 1978.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    McClellan SB, Warner CY, Allsop DL, Perl TR. Compliance of the human cadaver head in the temporal-parietal region. Internal publication, Collision Safety Engineering, Orem, UT, December 1990.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hodgson VR, Thomas LM. Breaking strength of the human skull vs. impact surface curvature. Wayne State University School of Medicine Department of Neurosurgery, Final report, contract No. FH-11–7609, June 1971.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hodgson VR, Thomas LM. Breaking strength of the human skull vs. Impact surface curvature. Detroit: Wayne State University School of Medicine. NHTSA DOT-H-S-801–002. PB 233 041. November 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas L. Allsop

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations