Ambiguous Figures: A Paradigm for Separation of Superimposed Images

  • Lawrence Stark
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Vision Research book series (PIVR)

Abstract

How does the brain separate simultaneously viewed images? A number of preattentive, primitive, hardwired visual processes are discussed in other chapters in Part III A. These include stereo viewing, motion as a disambiguating process, accommodation, and vergence. The residual “classical” case can be defined as two clearly viewed superimposed images not in relative motion with respect to one another. Still, the brain can handle this case. Figure-ground separations and cognitive shifts with different interpretations of an ambiguous figure form the paradigm that here concerns us.

Keywords

Cognitive Model Visual Imagery American Sign Language Ambiguous Figure Necker Cube 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brandt, S., Stark, L., Hacisalihzade, S., Allen, J., and Tharp, G., 1989, Experimental evidence for scanpath eye movement during visual imagery, in: Proceedings 11th IEEE/EMBS, Seattle, Buswell, G. T., 1935, How people look at pictures, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Didday, R. L., and Arbib, M. A., 1972, Eye Movements and Visual Perception: A “Two Visual System Model,” COINS Technical Report 73C-9, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Ellis, S. R., and Stark, L., 1978, Eye movements while viewing Necker cubes, Perception 7:575–581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellis, S. R., and Stark, L., 1979, Reply to Piggins, Perception 8:721–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, S. R., and Stark, L., 1986, Statistical dependency in visual scanning, Hum. Factors 28:421–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Groner, R., and Groner, M. T., 1989, Attention and eye movement control: An overview, European Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 239:9–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Groner, R., Walder, F., and Groner, N., 1984, Looking at faces: Local and global aspects of scanpaths, in: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  8. Hacisalihzade, S., Allen, J., and Stark, L., 1989, Automatic analysis of eye movement with a PC, in: Procession of the 11th Annual IEEE/EMBS, Seattle 1989.Google Scholar
  9. Jeannerod, M., Gerin, P., and Pernier, J., 1968, Deplacements et fixation du regard dans l’exploration libre d’une scene visuelle, Vision Res. 8:81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leroy, M., and Stark, L., 1989, Personal Communication.Google Scholar
  11. Locher, P., and Nodine, C., 1973, The influence of visual symmetry on visual scanning patterns, Percept. Psychophys. 13:408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Noton, D., and Stark, L., 1971a, Eye movements and visual perception, Sci. Am. 224:34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Noton, D., and Stark, L., 1971b, Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception, Science 171:308–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Noton, D., and Stark, L., 1971c, Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns, Vision Res. 11:929–942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parker, R. E., 1978, Picture processing during recognition, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 4:284–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prokowski, F. J., 1971, A model for human eye movements during viewing of a general, two-dimensional, dynamic display, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  17. Rizzo, M., Hurtig, R., and Damasio, A. R., 1987, The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning, Annal, of Neurology, 22:41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stark, L., and Ellis, S. R., 1981, Scanpaths revisited: Cognitive models direct active looking, in: Eye Movements, Cognition and Visual Perception (Fisher, Monty, and Senders, eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 193–226.Google Scholar
  19. Stark, L., Ellis, S. R., Inoue, H., Freksa, C. R., and Zeevi, J., 1979, Cognitive models direct scanpath eye movements, in: XII International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering, Jerusalem, Israel,Google Scholar
  20. Yarbus, A. L., 1967, Eye movements and vision, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Zangemeister, W., Sherman, K., and Stark, L., 1989, Scanpath eye movements while viewing abstract images, in: Fifth European Conference on Eye Movements (R. Schmidt and D. Zambarbieri, eds.), Pavia University Press, Pavia, Italy, pp. 261–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Stark
    • 1
  1. 1.School of OptometryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations