Low-Noise High-Speed CMOS Detector Readout Electronics

  • Zhong Yuan Chang
  • Willy M. C. Sansen
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 117)

Abstract

In elementary-particle physics, the energies of elementary particles or radiation events are measured or detected by means of a semiconductor detector readout system. A principle schematic of such a detection system is depicted in Fig. 5.1. An inverse biased photo sensitive diode (Si or Ge) detects charged particles or radiation events by generating electron-hole pairs within the detector material. The generated electrons drift in a high electrical field towards the positive-biased n+ contact of the detector and are finally collected. Since the collection time is very short, being in the order of several ns [5.1], [5.2], the detector output signal can be represented as a Dirac current impulse, the integral of which equals the total generated charge Q. The generated charge Q is integrated onto a small feedback capacitor C f . by means of a low noise charge sensitive amplifier (CSA) giving rise to a voltage step at the CSA output with an amplitude Q/C f . The wide use of the CSA at the front end stems from its low noise configuration and insensitivity of the gain to the detector capacitance variations. The step signal is fed to a main amplifier where pulse shaping is performed, primarily to optimize the S/N ratio of the readout system. Therefore, it is called a pulse shaper. In all cases, the resulting output signal is a rather narrow pulse suitable for further processing. Depending on the application, the pulse processing unit can simply be a Multi-Channel Analyzer (MCA) in radiation spectroscopy applications, a series of discriminators for event detections or sample-hold circuits in a multi-channel readout system to store the informations for serial read out. However, for resolution analyses, the detail of the circuits in the processing unit is of no concern and only the CSA and the pulse shaper will therefore be considered in this chapter.

Keywords

Pulse Shaper CMOS Technology Readout System Input Transistor Detector Capacitance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [5.1]
    E. Gatti and P.F. Manfredi, Processing the Signal from Solid-State Detectors in Elementary particle Physics, 1986Google Scholar
  2. [5.2]
    Glenn. F. Knoll, Rdiation detection and measurement, John Wiley & Sons, 1979Google Scholar
  3. [5.3]
    R. Hofmann et al., “Development of readout electronics for monolithic integration with diode strip detectors,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A266 pp. 196–199, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [5.4]
    James T. Walker et al., “development of high density readout for silicon strip detectors,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A253 pp. 427–433, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5.5]
    P. Seller, “A CMOS integrated circuit for silicon strip detector readout,” Digest of papers ESSCIRC 1987, pp. 281–284Google Scholar
  6. [5.6]
    Erik H.M Heijne and Pirre Jarron, “A low noise CMOS integrated signal processor for multi-element particle detectors,” Digest of papers ESSCIRC 1988, pp. 68–69Google Scholar
  7. [5.7]
    W. Buttler and B.J. Hosticka, “Low noise low power CMOS readout systems for silicon strip detectors,” Digest of papers ESSCIRC 1988, pp. 171–174Google Scholar
  8. [5.8]
    A. Olsen et al., “A CMOS charge sensitive amplifier for silicon strip detectors: Design criteria and test results,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A273 pp. 565–569, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [5.9]
    G. Lutz et al., “Low noise monolithic CMOS front end electronics,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A263 pp. 163–173, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [5.10]
    W. Buttler and BJ.Hosticka, “All-WET amplifiers for low noise applications,” Digest of papers ESSCIRC 1989, pp. 133–136Google Scholar
  11. [5.11]
    E. Beuville et al., “Amplex, a low-noise, low-power analog CMOS signal processor for multi-element silicon particle detectors,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A288 pp. 157–167, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [5.12]
    F.S. Goulding and D.A. Landis, “Signal processing for semiconductor detectors,” IEEE Trans on Nuclear Science, Vol.NS-29, No. 3, pp. 1125–1141, June 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [5.13]
    F.S. Goulding, “Pulse-shaping in low noise nuclear amplifier: A physical approach to noise analysis,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods 100 pp. 493–504, 1972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [5.14]
    M.O. Deighton, “A time-domain method for calculating noise of active integrator used in pulse amplitude spectrometry,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods 58 pp.201212, 1968Google Scholar
  15. [5.15]
    W. Sannen, “Integrated low noise amplifiers in CMOS technology,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A253 pp. 427–433, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [5.16]
    Z.Y.Chang and W.Sansen, “Test structure for evaluation of 1/f noise in CMOS technologies,” IEEE Proc ICMTS’89 pp.143–146Google Scholar
  17. [5.17]
    W. Buttler et al., “Evaluation in the criteria that underlie the design of a monolithic preamplifier system for microstrip detectors,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A288 pp. 140–149, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [5.18]
    U. Schoeneberg et al., “A CMOS readout system for vey large detector capacitance,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A288 pp. 191–196, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [5.19]
    J. Lewis et al., “A monolithic charge multiplexer with 0.5% accuracy,” Nuclear Instrum and Methods in Phys Research A288 pp. 197–208, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [5.20]
    D.A. Landis et al., “Transistor reset preamplifier for high counting rate high resolution spectrocopy,” IEEE Trans on Nuclear Science, Vol.NS-29, No. 1, pp. 619–624, Feb. 1982Google Scholar
  21. [5.21]
    Paul R. Gray and Robert G. Meyer, “Recent advances in monolithic operational amplifier design,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and systems, Vol. CAS-21, No. 3, May 1974, pp. 317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [5.22]
    Paul R. Gray and Robert G. Meyer, “MOS operational amplifier design–A tutorial overview,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. SC-17, No. 6, Dec. 1982, pp. 969–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [5.23]
    W. Sansen and Z.Y. Chang, “Limits of low noise performance of detector readout front end in CMOS technology,” to appear IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst Vol. CAS-37, 1990Google Scholar
  24. [5.24]
    W. Sansen and Z.Y.Chang, “Feedforward compensation techniques of CMOS high frequency amplifiers,” to appear IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits Google Scholar
  25. [5.25]
    Z.Y. Chang and W. Sansen, “Effect of 1/f noise on resolution of CMOS analog readout system for micro-strip and pixel detectors,” to appear Nuclear Instrum and Methods A 1991Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhong Yuan Chang
    • 1
  • Willy M. C. Sansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Catholic University LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations