Advertisement

Maternofetal Potential Differences: Studies Using the In Vitro Pig Placenta

  • B. S. Ward
  • W. M. O. Moore
  • C. P. Sibley
  • J. D. Glazier
  • R. D. H. Boyd
Chapter
Part of the Trophoblast Research book series (TR)

Abstract

A potential difference (pd) between maternal and fetal circulations created by active transport of electrolytes by the placenta would be important not only for the actively transported species themselves, but also for the transfer of passively distributed charged molecules. In several species, it is possible to measure a pd between catheters placed in maternal and fetal vessels. It is possible that this maternofetal pd is a result of active electrolyte transport by the placenta. However, the recorded pd’s have a wide range, for example in the sheep it is 34 mV, fetus negative relative to mother (Weedon et al., 1978), whereas in the rat it is 14 mV, fetus positive (Mellor, 1969). Considerable doubt is shed on the placental basis of this pd by at least two lines of evidence. Firstly, there appears to be no relationship between the magnitude and polarity of the pd and the type of placenta, e.g., the guinea pig which has a relatively permeable (Hedley and Bradbury, 1980) haemochorial placenta demonstrates a pd of 18 mV, fetus negative (Mellor, 1969) more similar to that of the sheep, which has a relatively impermeable (Boyd et al., 1976) epitheliochorial type of placenta than to the term human (O mV, Mellor et al., 1969). Further evidence against the placenta being the site of pd generation comes from Binder et al. (1978) and Thornburg et al. (1979) who found in the guinea pig and sheep, respectively, that the steady-state concentration ratio between maternal and fetal plasmas of exogenous ions injected into the mother was consistent with a near zero transplacental pd. They suggest that the maternofetal pd is generated at a site outside of the placental exchange area.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazer, F.W., Goldstein, M.H., and Barron, D.H. (1981) Water and electrolyte transport by pig chorioallantois. In: Fertilization and Embryonic Development In Vitro, (eds.), L. Mastroianni and J.D. Biggers, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belleville, F., Lasbennes, A., Nabet, P., and Paysant, P. (1978) HSC-HCG regulation in cultured placenta. Acta Endocrinol. 88, 169–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Binder, N.D., Faber, J.J., and Thornburg, K.L. (1978) The transplacental potential difference as distinguished from the maternal-fetal potential difference of the guinea pig. J. Physiol. 282, 561–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd, R.D.H., Haworth, C., Stacey, T.E., and Ward, R.H.T. (1976) Permeability of the sheep placenta to unmetabolized polar non-electrolytes. J. Physiol. 256, 617634.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, R.D.H., Glazier, J.D., Moore, W.M.O., Sibley, C.P., and Ward, B.S. (1984) Effect of dibutyryl cAMP (DBc AMP) on short circuit current (Iscc) and sodium flux across mini-pig placenta. J. Physiol. 349, 43 P.Google Scholar
  6. Brambel, C.E. (1933) Allantochorionic differentiations of the pig studied morphologically and histochemically. Am. J. Anat. 52, 397–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caritis, S.N., Hirsch, R.P., and Zeleznik, A.J. (1983) Adrenergic stimulation of placental progesterone production. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 56, 969–972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawford, J.D. and McCance, R.A. (1960) Sodium transport by the chorioallantoic membrane of the pig. J. Physiol. 151, 458–471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Firth, J.A. (1983) Microscopic analysis of electrolyte secretion. In: Progress in Anatomy(eds.), V. Navaratnam and R.J. Harrison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar
  10. Firth, J.A., Sibley, C.P., and Ward, B.S. (1986) Histochemical localization of phosphatases in the pig placenta. II. Potassium-dependent and potassium-independent p-nitrophenyl phosphatases at high pH: relation to sodiumpotassium-dependent adenosine triphosphatase. Placenta 7, 27–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ginsberg, J. and Jeacock, M.K. (1968) Effect of epinephrine on placental carbohydrate metabolism. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 100, 357–365.Google Scholar
  12. Goldstein, M.H., Bazer, F.W., and Barron, D.H. (1980) Characterization of changes in volume, osmolarity and electrolyte composition of porcine fetal fluids during gestation. Biol. Reprod. 22, 1168–1180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hedley, R. and Bradbury, M.W.B. (1980) Transport of polar nonelectrolytes across intact and perfused guinea pig placenta. Placenta 1, 277–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lands, A.M., Arnold, A., McAuliff, J.P., Luduena, F.P., and Brown, T.G. (1967) Differentiation of receptor systems activated by sympathomimetic amines. Nature 214, 597–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Macdonald, A.A., Colenbrander, B., Versteeg, D.H.G., Heilhecker, A., and Wensing, C.J.G. (1984) Catecholamines in fetal pig plasma and the response to acute hypoxia and chronic fetal decapitation. Roux. Arch. Dey. Biol. 193,19–23.Google Scholar
  16. Mellor, D.J. (1969) Potential differences between mother and fetus at different gestational ages in the rat, rabbit and guinea pig. J. Physiol. 204, 395–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mellor, D.J., Cockburn, F., Lees, M.M., and Blagdon, A. (1969) Distribution of ions and electrical potential differences between mother and fetus in the human at term. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Cmwlth. 76, 993–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Michael, K., Ward, B.S., and Moore, W.M.O. (1985) In vitro permeability of the pig placenta in the last third of gestation. Biol. Neonate 47, 170–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore, J.J. and Whitsett, J.A. (1982) The ß-adrenergic receptor in mammalian placenta: species differences and ontogeny. Placenta 3, 257–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Padbury, J.F., Hobel, C.J., Diakomanolis, E.S., Lam, R.W., and Fisher, D.A. (1981) Ontogenesis of beta-adrenergic receptors in the ovine placenta. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 139, 459–464.Google Scholar
  21. Sibley, C.P., Ward, B.S., Glazier, J.D., and Boyd, R.D.H. (1985) Placental electrolyte transfer with particular reference to sodium. In: The Physiological Development of the Fetus and Newborn(eds.), C.T. Jones and P.W. Nathanielsz, Academic Press, London, pp. 520–526.Google Scholar
  22. Sibley, C.P., Ward, B.S., Glazier, J.D., Moore, W.M.O., and Boyd, R.D.H. (1986) Electrical activity and sodium transfer across the in vitro pig placenta. Am. J. Physiol. 250, R474 - R484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Silver, M. (1980) Intravascular catheterization and other chronic fetal preparations in the mare and sow. In: Animal Models in Fetal Medicine (1), (ed.), P.W. Nathanielsz, Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp. 107132.Google Scholar
  24. Thornburg, K.L., Binder, N.D., and Faber, J.J. (1979) Distribution of ionic sulfate, lithium and bromide across the sheep placenta. Am. J. Physiol. 236, C58 - C65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Weedon, A.P., Stacey, T.E., Canning, J.F., Ward, R.H.T., and Boyd, R.D.H. (1980) Materno-fetal electrical potential difference in conscious sheep: effect of fetal death or acidosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 138, 422–428.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. S. Ward
    • 1
  • W. M. O. Moore
    • 1
  • C. P. Sibley
    • 3
  • J. D. Glazier
    • 2
  • R. D. H. Boyd
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of Manchester Saint Mary’s HospitalManchesterUK
  2. 2.Child HealthUniversity of Manchester Saint Mary’s HospitalManchesterUK
  3. 3.PhysiologyUniversity of Manchester Saint Mary’s HospitalManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations