Impedance Control Applied to Automated Deburring

  • Neville Hogan

Abstract

This paper considers some aspects of automatic deburring by robot. The strategy proposed is based on impedance control. Impedance control is a parameter-adaptive approach to manipulation aimed at modulating the effective dynamic behavior of a robot, rather than just its end-effector force or motion. To apply impedance control to robotic deburring, a simple model of the deburring process is developed. A target impedance for the robot is proposed which facilitates the identification of the parameters of the model of the deburring environment and leads to a straightforward parameter-adaptive control strategy for the robot. A method for selecting values for the parameters of an impedance appropriate for deburring is developed by describing the robot’s task as an optimization problem. This method yields simple expressions relating the target impedance parameters to tolerances on the interface forces between the tool and the workpiece and tolerances on the desired motion of the tool.

Keywords

ASME Journal Impedance Control Interface Force Task Objective Viscous Coefficient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J.R. Andrews, “Impedance Control as a Framework for Implementing Obstacle Avoidance in a Manipulator,” S.M. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.I.T., 1983.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S.L. Cotter, “Nonlinear Feedback Control of Manipulator End-Point Impedance,” S.M. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.I.T., 1982.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    N. Hogan, “Control Strategies for Complex Movements Derived from Physical Systems Theory,” paper presented at the International Symposium on Synergetics, Bavaria, May 1985.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. Hogan, “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I - Theory,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 107, pp. 1–7, March 1985.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    N. Hogan, “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II–Implementation,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 107, pp. 8–16, March 1985.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    N. Hogan, “Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part III–Applications,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 107, pp. 17–24, March 1985.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    N. Hogan, “Impedance Control of Industrial Robots,” Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 1, pp. 97–113, 1984.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Kazerooni, “A Robust Design Method for Impedance Control of Constrained Dynamic Systems,” Sc.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.I.T., 1985.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. Kramer, J.J. Bausch, R.L. Gott and D.M. Dombrowski, “Robotic Deburring,” submitted to the International Journal of Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    D.E. Whitney, “Force Feedback Control of Manipulator Fine Motions,” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, pp. 91–97, June 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neville Hogan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations