Typification of Aspergillus and Related Teleomorph Genera

  • W. Gams
  • R. A. Samson
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 102)

Summary

After a historical survey, the genus Aspergillus Mich. ex Link: Fr. is lectotypified by Aspergillus glaucus (Mich. ex L.: Fr.) Link. The monotype of the associated teleomorph-genus Eurotium Link: Fr. is Eurotium herbariorum (Wiggers: Fr.) Link. Two specimens preserved in Persoon’s herbarium in Leiden as Mucor herbariorum agree with the present concept of this species but none of them can be considered as a holotype of the species. Hence Malloch and Cain’s designation of a neo-type (DAOM 137960) with an associated living culture (CBS 516.65 = ATCC 16469) can be upheld. For the anamorph two specimens are preserved in Persoon’s herbarium too, which are not sufficiently representative, so that the above-mentioned specimen listed as type for the anamorph A. glaucus by Blaser can be recognized. Typification of the remaining teleomorph genera does not present problems.

Keywords

Present Concept Rose Flower Conidial Head Anamorphic Genus Reduce Water Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DE BARY, A. (1854). Ueber die Entwicklung und den Zusammenhang von Aspergillus qlaucus und Eurotium. Bot. Ztg. 12: 425434, 441–451, 465–471.Google Scholar
  2. DE BARY, A. and Woronin, M. (1870). Beiträge zur Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze 3. (1870). Eurotium, Erysiphe, Cicinnobolus. Abh. Senckenb. naturforsch. Ges. 7: 361–382.Google Scholar
  3. BENJAMIN, C.R. (1955). Ascocarps of Aspergillus and Penicillium. Mycologia 47: 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BLASER, P. (1975). Taxonomische und physiologische Untersuchun-gen über die Gattung Eurotium Link ex Fr. Sydowia 28: 1–49.Google Scholar
  5. CLEMENTS, F.E. and SHEAR, C.L. (1931). The Genera of Fungi. ( Reprint Hafner, New York, 1957 ).Google Scholar
  6. CORDA, A.C.J. (1831). In J. Sturm Deutschlands Flora. III. Abth., 11. Heft, Nürnberg.Google Scholar
  7. CORDA, A.C.J. (1838). Icones Fungorum hucusque cognitorum. Vol. 2. Pragae.Google Scholar
  8. CORDA, A.C.J. (1840). Icones Fungorum hucusque cognitorum. Vol. 4. Pragae.Google Scholar
  9. CRAMER, C. (1859). Über eine neue Fadenpilzgattung im Ohr, Sterigmatocvstis antacustica. Vierteljahresschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich 4: 323; also Bot. Ztg 18: 133. 1860.Google Scholar
  10. DOMSCH, K.H., GAMS, W. and ANDERSON, T.-H. (1980). Compendium of soil fungi. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. FISCHER, E. (1897). Plectascineae. In Engler and Prantl, Natuerl. Pflanzenfam. 1(1): 290–320. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  12. FRESENIUS, G. (1853). Mykologische Notizen. Bot. Ztg. 11: 474.Google Scholar
  13. FRESENIUS, G. (1850–1863). Beiträge zur Mykologie. Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  14. FRIES, E.M. (1832). Systema mycologicum. Vol. 3(2). Gryphiswaldae.Google Scholar
  15. GLEDISCH, J. G. (1753). Methodus Fungorum. Berolini.Google Scholar
  16. HALLER, A. von (1768). Historia stirpum indigenarum Helvetiae inchoata. Vol. 3: 113–114. and p. 413 (nr. 1257).Google Scholar
  17. LINNÉ, C. von. (1753). Species Plantarum, Tomus II. Holmiae.Google Scholar
  18. LINNÉ, C. von. (1797). Systema Vegetabilium 15: 1020.Google Scholar
  19. MALLOCH, D. and CAIN, R.F. (1972). The Trichocomataceae: Ascomycetes with Aspergillus, Paecilomvces and Penicil-lium imperfect states. Can. J. Bot. 50: 2613–2628.Google Scholar
  20. MALLOCH, D. and CAIN, R.F. (1973). The Trichocomacae (Ascomy-cetes): synonyms in recent publications. Can. J. Bot. 51: 1647–1648.Google Scholar
  21. MICHELI, P.A. (1729). Nova Plantarum Genera. Florentiae. MÜLLER, O.F. (1777). Flora Danica, vol. V, fasc. 13. Kopenha-gen. (date fide Stafleu F.A. and Cowan, R.S. 1981: Taxonomic literature III: 805, The Hague).Google Scholar
  22. PERSOON, C.H. (1801). Synopsis methodica Fungorum.Google Scholar
  23. PITT, J.I. (1979). The genus Penicillium and its teleomorphic states Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. Academic Press, London (published 1980 ).Google Scholar
  24. RAPER, K.B. and Fennell, D.I. (1965). The genus Aspergillus. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  25. SACCARDO, P.A. (1880). Conspectus generum fungorum Italiae inferiorum. Michelia 2: 1–38.Google Scholar
  26. SAMSON, R.A. (1979). A compilation of the Aspergilli described since 1965. Stud. Mycol. 18: 38 pp.Google Scholar
  27. SOWERBY, J. (1797–1809). Coloured figures of English Fungi or Mushrooms. London. Vol. I II. 1803.Google Scholar
  28. SUBRAMANIAN, C.V. (1971). Hyphomycetes, an account of Indian species except Cercosporae. ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  29. SUBRAMANIAN, C.V. (1972). The perfect states of Aspergillus. Current Science 41: 755–761.Google Scholar
  30. WIGGERS, F.H. (1780). Primitiae Florae Holsatiae. Kiliae.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Gams
    • 1
  • R. A. Samson
    • 1
  1. 1.Centraalbureau voor SchimmelculturesBaarnNetherlands

Personalised recommendations