Individual Differences in Pupil Size and Performance

  • W. Scott Peavler

Abstract

Individual differences in pupil size are not surprising since they have been well documented by ocular scientists for years, although emphasis has typically been on abnormalities. What may be surprising, however, is the possibility that some of these presumably inherent differences may be related to performance characteristics of the individuals. I would like to discuss some research which suggests that certain pupillary measurements may be useful as performance predictors of individual capabilities, and/or group behavior. Before describing the first study (Peavler, in press), a brief review of some of the previous pupillary research seems appropriate.

Keywords

Pupil Size Pupil Diameter Pupillary Response Work Period Dilation Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartley, S. H. Fatigue and inadequacy. Physiological Review, 1957, 37, 301–324.Google Scholar
  2. Beatty, J., and Kahneman, D. Pupillary changes in two memory tasks. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 5, 371–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernick, N., and Oberlander, M. Effect of verbalization and two different modes of experiencing on pupil size. Perception and Psycho-physics, 1968, 3, 327–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, J. Pupil size as a measure of arousal during information processing. Nature, 1967, 216, 515–516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, J. Pupil size and problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 20, 116–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron, C. Fatigue problems in modern industry. Ergonomics, 1971, 14, 713–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmichael, L., and Dearborn, W. F. Reading and Visual Fatigue, Greenwood, 1947.Google Scholar
  8. Carver, R. P. Pupil dilation and its relationship to information processing during reading and listening. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 126–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dearnaley, E. J. Fatigue: A psychological review. Royal Air Force Institute of Aviation Medicine, I.A.M. Report 110, 1958.Google Scholar
  10. Duke-Elder, E. S. Textbook of Ophthalmology, Vol. 1, St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1946.Google Scholar
  11. Finan, J. L., Finan, S. C., and Hartson, L. D. A review of representative tests used for the quantitative measurement of behavior decrement under conditions related to aircraft flights. U. S. Air Force, Air Material Command, Dayton, Ohio. Technical Report, 5830, 1949.Google Scholar
  12. Geacintov, T., and Peavler, W. S. Pupillography in industrial fatigue assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  13. Goldwater, B. C. Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 340–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hakerem, G., and Sutton, S. Pupillary response at visual threshold. Nature, 1966, 212, 485–486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess, E. H. Pupillometrics. In N. S. Greenfield and R. A. Sternbach (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Hess, E. H., and Polt, J. M. Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 1960, 132, 349–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hess, E. H., and Polt, J. M. Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science, 1964, 143, 1190–1192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Janisse, M. P. Pupil size and affect: a critical review of the literature since 1960. Canadian Psychologist, 1913, 14(4), 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, D. A. Pupillary responses during a short-term memory task: cognitive processing, arousal, or both. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 90, 311–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahneman, D. Construct validity of the pupil response. Paper presented at American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1967.Google Scholar
  21. Kahneman, D., and Beatty, J. Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 1966, 154, 1583–1585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D., and Beatty, J. Pupillary response in a pitch-discrimination task. Perception and Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D., Onuska, L., and Wolman, R. Effects of grouping on the pupillary response in a short-term memory task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968. 20, 309–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., and Peavler, W. S. Incentive effects and pupillary-changes in association learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 79, 312–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., Peavler, W. S., and Onuska, L. Effects of verbalization and incentive on the pupil response to mental activity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1968, 22, 186–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahneman, D., Tursky, B., Shapiro, D., and Crider, A. Pupillary, heart rate, and skin resistance changes during a mental task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 79, 147–164.Google Scholar
  27. Libby, W. L., Lacey, B. C., and Lacey, J. I. Pupillary and cardiac activity during visual attention. Psychophysiology, 1973, 10, 270–294.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loewenfeld, I. E. Mechanisms of reflex dilation of the pupil. Historical review and experimental analysis. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 1958, 12, 185–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowenstein, O., and Loewenfeld, I. E. Type of central autonomic innervation and fatigue. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1951, 66, 581–599.Google Scholar
  30. Lowenstein, O., and Loewenfeld, I. E. The sleep-waking cycle and pupillary activity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1964, 117, 142–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lowenstein, O., Feinberg, R., and Loewenfeld, I. E. Pupillary movements during acute and chronic fatigue. Investigative Ophthalmology, 1963. 2, 138–157.Google Scholar
  32. McFarland, R. A. Understanding fatigue in modern life. Ergonomics, 1971, 14(1), 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nunnally, J. C., Knott, P. D., Duchnowski, A., and Parker, R. Pupillary response as a general measure of activation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peavler, W. S. Attention, processing load, and pupil size. Paper presented at Sixth Colloquium on the Pupil, Bethesda, Md., May, 1969.Google Scholar
  35. Peavler, W. S. Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences. Psychophysiology, in press.Google Scholar
  36. Peavler, W. S., and McLaughlin, J. P. The question of stimulus content and pupil size. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 8(12), 505–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Przystanowicz, A. Effect of fatigue on the precision of positioning movements. Przeglad Psychologiczny, 1970, No. 19, 33–44.Google Scholar
  38. Shakhnovich, A. R. On the pupillary component of the orienting reflex during action of stimuli specific for vision and nonspecific (extraneous) stimuli. In L. G. Varonin, A. N. Leontiev, A. R. Luria, E. N. Sokolov, and O. S. Vinogradova (Eds.), Orienting reflex and exploratory behavior, Vol. III. Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Biological Sciences, 1965.Google Scholar
  39. Simpson, H. M. Pupillary activity during imagery tasks. Paper presented at American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1967.Google Scholar
  40. Simpson, H. M., and Molloy, F. M. Effects of audience anxiety on pupil size, Psychophysiology, 1971, 8, 491–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simpson, H. M., and Paivio, A. Changes in pupil size during an imagery task without motor response involvement. Psychonomic Science, 1966, 5, 405–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simpson, H. M., and Paivio, A. Effects on pupil size of manual and verbal indicators of cognitive task fulfillment. Perception, and Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Snell, Peter A. An introduction to the experimental study of visual fatigue. Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers, 1933, 20, 367–390.Google Scholar
  44. Weston, H. C. Visual fatigue. Illumination Engineering, 1954, 49, 63–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Scott Peavler
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Performance Technology CenterBell LaboratoriesNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations