Abstract

Much of the usefulness of fluorescence in biology derives from the fact that an electronically excited molecule has different reactivity than its ground-state parent. Light absorption not only increases the energy content of a molecule but also significantly alters its physical and chemical properties. The absorbing molecule is transformed into a new species capable of undergoing a variety of photoreactions during its life span of several nanoseconds. When a photoreaction proceeds adiabatically,1 i.e. if the photoreaction yields electronically excited products, then the possibility of observing dual, multiple or continuous fluorescence exists.2 The degree of complexity of this fluorescence depends on the number of excited products generated and on their relative quantum efficiencies. This number in turn depends on the reactivity of the parent excitation and on the nature of the local solvent environment, which includes the availability of reaction partners as well as more generalized bulk properties such as polarity, viscosity and polarizability.

Keywords

Fluorescence Decay Spectral Position Electronic Relaxation Solvent Relaxation Solvent Cage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Th. Förster, Primary Photophysical Processes, Pure Appl.Chem. 34, 225 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.B. Birks, Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules — A Postscript, in Organic Molecular Photophysics, J.B. Birks, ed., Volume 2, Wiley, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Rapp, H.-H. Klingenberg, and H.E. Lessing, A Kinetic Model for Fluorescence Solvatochromism, Ber.Bunsenges.Physik.Chem. 75, 883 (1971)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.E. Lessing and M. Reichert, Kinetics of Fluorescence Solvatochromism, Chem.Phys.Lett. 46, 111 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N.G. Bakhshiev, Yu. T. Mazurenko and I.V. Piterskaya, Luminescence Decay in Different Portions of the Luminescence Spectrum of Molecules in Viscous Solutions, Opt.Spectry. 21, 307 (1966)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.P. DeToma, J.H. Easter and L. Brand, Dynamic Interactions of Fluorescence Probes with the Solvent Environment, J.Amer. Chem.Soc. 98, 5001 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.P. DeToma and L. Brand, Excited State Solvation Dynamics of 2-Anilinonaphthalene, Chem.Phys.Lett. 47, 231 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu. T. Mazurenko and N.G. Bakhshiev, Effect of Orientation Dipole Relaxation on Spectral, Time, and Polarization Characteristics of the Luminescence of Solutions, Opt.Spectry. 28, 490 (1970)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu. T. Mazurenko, Temperature Dependence of Luminescence Spectra of Viscous Solutions, Opt.Spectry. 34 527 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.G. Badea and L. Brand, Time-resolved Fluorescence Measurements, in Methods in Enzymology: Enzyme Structure, C.H.W. Hirs and S.N. Timasheff, eds., Volume 61, Part H, Academic Press, New York, 1979, p. 379.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.H. Easter, R.P. DeToma and L. Brand, Nanosecond Time-Resolved Emission Spectroscopy of a Fluorescence Probe Adsorbed to L-a-Egg Lecithin Vesicles, Biophys.J. 16, 571 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.E. McKinnon, A.G. Szabo and D.R. Miller, The Deconvolution of Photoluminescence Data, J.Phys.Chem. 81, 1564 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. P. DeToma

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations