Abstract
At a conference on the Universals of language held in 1961, Roman Jakobson (1966: 274) stated that:
We most urgently need a systematic world-wide mapping of linguistic structural properties: distinctive features, inherent and prosodic — their types of concurrence and concatenation; grammatical concepts and the principles of their expression. The primary and less difficult task would be to prepare a phonemic atlas of the world.
Keywords
Culture Area Great Basin Language Family Northwest Coast Person Plural
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
- Boas, Franz. 1889. The Indians of British Columbia. Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada for the year 1888. 6 (section 2). 47–57.Google Scholar
- Boas, Franz. 1896. The growth of Indian mythologies. JAF 9.1–11. Reprinted in Franz Boas, Race, language and culture, pp. 425–36. New York, Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
- Boas, Franz. 1929. Classification of American Indian languages. Lg 5.1–7. Reprinted in Franz Boas, Race, language, and culture, pp. 219–25. New York, Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
- Bright, Jane and William. 1965. Semantic structures in Northwestern California and the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. AmA 67/5, Part 2. 249–58.Google Scholar
- Bright, William. 1959. Review of R.H. Robins, The Yurok language (UCPL 15, 1958). Lg 35. 100–4.Google Scholar
- Callaghan, CatherineA. 1964. Phonemic borrowing in Lake Miwok. Studies in Californian linguistics, ed. by William Bright, pp. 46–53. (UCPL 34.)Google Scholar
- Dixon, R.B. 1906. The pronominal dual in the languages of California. Boas Anniversary volume, pp. 80–4. New York.Google Scholar
- Dixon, R. B., and Alfred L. Kroeber. 1903. The native languages of California. AmA 5. 21–6.Google Scholar
- Dixon, R. B., and Alfred L. Kroeber. 1907. Numeral systems of the languages of California. AmA 9. 663–90.Google Scholar
- Dixon, R. B., and Alfred L. Kroeber. 1913. New linguistic families in California. AmA 15. 647–55.Google Scholar
- Dixon, R. B., and Alfred L. Kroeber. 1919. Linguistic families in California. UCPAAE 16. 46–118.Google Scholar
- Downs, James F. 1966. The significance of environmental manipulation in Great Basin cultural development. The current status of anthropological research in the Great Basin: 1964, ed. by Warren L. D’Azevedo et al., pp. 39–56. Reno, University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
- Dozier, Edward P. 1951. Resistance to acculturation and assimilation in an Indian Pueblo. AmA 53. 56–66.Google Scholar
- Dozier, Edward P. 1956. Two examples of linguistic acculturation. Lg 32.146–57. Reprinted in Hymes 1964 (q.v.), pp. 509–20.Google Scholar
- Driver, Harold E. 1961. Indians of North America. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Driver, Harold E. and William C. Massey. 1957. Comparative studies of North American Indians. TAPS 47. 165–456.Google Scholar
- Drucker, Philip. 1955. Indians of the Northwest Coast. New York, American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
- Emeneau, Murray. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Lg 32.3–16. Reprinted in Hymes 1964 (q.v.), pp. 642–53.Google Scholar
- Gumperz, John J. 1962. Types of linguistic communities. AnL 4/1.28–40. Reprinted in Readings in the sociology of language, ed. by Joshua A. Fishman, pp. 460–72. The Hague, Mouton, 1968.Google Scholar
- Gumperz, John J. 1967. On the linguistic markers of bilingual communication. JSI 23. 48–57.Google Scholar
- Haas, Mary R. 1958. A new linguistic relationship in North America: Algonkian and the Gulf languages. SJA 14. 231–64.Google Scholar
- Haas, Mary R. 1970. Consonant symbolism in Northwestern California: A problem in diffusion. Languages and cultures of Western North America, ed. by Earl H. Swanson, Jr., pp. 86–96. Pocatello, Idaho.Google Scholar
- Hover, Harry. 1941. Methods in the classification of American Indian languages. Language, culture, and personality, ed. by Leslie Spier et al., pp. 3–14. Menasha, Wisconsin, Sapir Memorial Publication Fund.Google Scholar
- Hover, Harry. 1948. Linguistic and cultural change. Lg 24.335–45. Reprinted in Hymes 1964 (q.v.): pp. 445–66.Google Scholar
- Hymes, Dell H. 1956. Review of Papers from the Symposium on American Indian Linguistics. Lg 32. 585–602.Google Scholar
- Hymes, Dell H. 1961. Alfred Louis Kroeber. Lg 37.1–28. Reprinted in Hymes 1964 (q.v.): pp. 689–710.Google Scholar
- Hymes, Dell H. ed. 1964. Language in culture and society: A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Hymes, Dell H. 1967. Models of the interaction of language and social setting. JSI 23. 8–28.Google Scholar
- Hymes, Dell H. 1968. Linguistic problems in defining the concept of. Linguistic problems in defining the concept of `tribe’. Essays on the problem of tribe, ed. by June Helm, pp. 23–48. PAES 1967.Google Scholar
- Hymes, Virginia Dosch. 1955. Athapaskan numeral systems. IJAL 21. 26–45.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, Melville. 1937. Historic perspectives in Indian languages of Oregon and Washington. PNQ 28. 55–74.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, Melville. 1954. The areal spread of sound features in the languages north of California. Papers from the Symposium on American Indian linguistics, pp. 46–56. UCPL 10.Google Scholar
- Jacobsen, William H., JR. 1966. Washo linguistic studies. The current status of anthropological research in the Great Basin: 1964, ed. by Warren L. D’ Azevedo et al., pp. 113–36. Reno, University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
- Jacobsen, William H., JR. 1967. Switch-reference in Hokan-Coahuiltecan. Studies in Southwestern ethnolinguistics, ed. by Dell Hymes, pp. 238–63. (= Studies in General Anthropology 3 ). The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
- Jacobsen, William H., JR. 1968. On the prehistory of Nez Perce vowel harmony. Lg 44. 819–29.Google Scholar
- Jakobson, Roman. 1966. Implications of language universals for linguistics. Universals of language, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, pp. 263–78. (q.v.)Google Scholar
- Kinkade, M. Dale. 1969. Lexical suffixes in Mosan languages. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, November, 1969.Google Scholar
- Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, pp. 170–202. New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- Krauss, Michael E. 1969. Classifying the Athapaskan languages. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, November 1969.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1904. The languages of the coast of California south of San Francisco. 2. 28–80.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1906. The Yokuts and Yuki languages. Boas Anniversary volume, pp. 64–79. New York. 2. 28–80.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1907. The Washo language of east central California and Nevada. 4. 241–317.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. A1911a. Phonetic constituents of the native languages of California. 10. 1–12.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1911b. The languages of the coast of California north of San Francisco. 9. 273–435.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1913. The determination of linguistic relationship. Anthropos 8. 389–401.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1917. California kinship systems. UCPAAE 12 /9. 339–96.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1939. Cultural and natural areas of native North America. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1959. Possible Athabaskan influence on Yuki. IJAL 25. 59.Google Scholar
- Kroeber, A.L. 1960. On typological indices I: Ranking of languages. IJAL 26. 171–7.Google Scholar
- Langdon, Margaret. 1971. Sound symbolism in Yuman languages. Studies in American Indian languages, ed. by Jesse Sawyer, pp. 149–74. (UCPL 65.)Google Scholar
- Lowie, Robert H. 1963. Indians of the Plains. New York, American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
- Mandelbaum, David G., ed. 1949. Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Milewski, Tadeusz. 1953. Phonological typology of American Indian languages. LPosn 4. 229–76.Google Scholar
- Miller, Wick R. 1966. Anthropological linguistics in the Great Basin. The current status of anthropological research in the Great Basin: 1964, ed. by Warren D’Azevedo et al., pp. 75–112. Reno, University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
- Oliver, Symmes C. 1962. Ecology and cultural continuity as contributing factors in the social organization of the Plains Indians. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Pitkin, Harvey, and William Shipley. 1958. A comparative survey of California Penutian. IJAL 24. 174–88.Google Scholar
- Powell, John Wesley. 1891. Indian linguistic families of America north of Mexico. BAE-R 7.Google Scholar
- Rigsby, Bruce, and Michael Silverstein. 1969. Nez Perce vowels and ProtoSahaptian vowel harmony. Lg 45. 45–59.Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1907. Preliminary report on the language and mythology of the Upper Chinook. AmA 9. 533–44.Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1912. Language and environment. AmA 14.226–42. Reprinted in SWES (= Mandelbaum 1949, q.v.): 89–103.Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1913a. Southern Paiute and Nahuatl, a study in Uto-Aztecan, Pt. I. JSocAm 10. 379–425.Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1913b. Wiyot and Yurok, Algonkin languages of California. AmA 15. 617–46.Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1915a. Southern Paiute and Nahuatl, a study in Uto-Aztecan, Pt. II. AmA 17.98–120, 306–28. Also JSocAm 11. 443–88 (1914).Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1916. Time perspective in aboriginal American culture: A study in method. Canada, Department of Mines, Geological Survey, Memoir 90. Anthropological Series No. 13. Ottawa. Reprinted in SWES (= Mandelbaum 1949, q.v.): 389–462.Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1925. The Hokan affinity of Subtiaba in Nicaragua. AmA 27.402–35, 491–527.Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1926. A Chinookan phonetic law. IJAL 4.105–10. Reprinted in SWES (= Mandelbaum 1949, q.v.): 197–205.Google Scholar
- Sapir, Edward. 1947. The relation of American Indian linguistics to general linguistics. SJA 3. 1–4.Google Scholar
- Secoy, Frank Raymond. 1953. Changing military patterns on the Great Plains. Seattle, University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
- Sherzer, Joel. 1968. An areal-typological study of the American Indian languages north of Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- Shipley, William F. 1966. The relation of Klamath to California Penutian. Lg 42. 489–98.Google Scholar
- Silver, Shirley. 1964. Shasta and Karok: A binary comparison. Studies in Californian linguistics, ed. by William Bright, pp. 170–81. (UCPL 34.)Google Scholar
- Spencer, Robert, Jesse D. Jennings, et al. 1965. The native Americans. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Straus, Wayne. 1960. Affinal ties, subsistence, and prestige among the Coast Salish. AmA 63. 296–305.Google Scholar
- Swadesh, Morris. 1966. El lenguaje y la vida humana. Mexico, Fondo de cultura economica.Google Scholar
- Swadesh, Morris. 1971. The origin and diversification of language. Chicago, Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
- Swanton, John R. 1924. The Muskhogean connection of the Natchez language. IJAL 3. 46–75.Google Scholar
- Teit, James A. 1956. Field notes on the Tahltan and Kaska Indians: 1912–15. Anthropologica 3. 40–171.Google Scholar
- Thompson, Stith. 1929. Tales of the North American Indians. Cambridge, Mass. ( Reprinted, Indiana University Press. )Google Scholar
- Trager, George L. 1939. `Cottonwood’ _ `Tree’: A Southwestern linguistic trait. IJAL 9.117–18. Reprinted in Hymes 1964 (q.v.): pp. 467–8.Google Scholar
- Troike, Rudolph C. 1961. A Nahuatl loan-word in Coahuilteco. IJAL 17.272–5. 1964. The Caddo word for `water’. IJAL 30. 96–8.Google Scholar
- Velten, H.V. 1943. The Nez Perce verb. PNQ 34. 271–92.Google Scholar
- Voegelin, C.F. 1941. North American Indian languages still spoken and their genetic relationships. Language, culture, and personality, ed. by Leslie Spier et al., pp. 15–40. Menasha, Wisconsin, Sapir Memorial Publication Fund.Google Scholar
- Voegelin, C.F. 1945a. Influence of area on American Indian linguistics. Word 7.54–8. Reprinted in Hymes 1964 (q.v.), pp. 638–41.Google Scholar
- Voegelin, C.F. 1945b. Relative chronology of North American linguistic types. AmA 47. 47. 232–4.Google Scholar
- Voegelin, C.F. 1961. Culture area: Parallel with typological homogeneity and heterogeneity to North American language families. KASP 25. 163–80.Google Scholar
- Weinreich, Uriel. 1958. On the compatibility of genetic relationship and convergent development. Word 14. 374–9.Google Scholar
- Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and marvin l. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Directions for historical linguistics, ed. by W.P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, pp. 95–188. Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1976