Evaluation of Dummy Neck Performance
As the structural link between the head and chest, the neck plays a vital role in determining the dynamics of the head during indirect impact. This paper discusses the factors involved in specifying and quantifying the dynamic performance of dummy neck simulations.
The literature on cervical spine mechanics, including recent x-ray studies on cervical spine mobility in human volunteers and human volunteer sled tests is reviewed and summarized with respect to human head-neck response to dynamic loading. The mechanics of the head-neck system is discussed and a rationale is developed for utilizing human volunteer response data in assessing neck simulation performance. Additional factors influencing dummy neck design are indicated and the results of a program to develop an improved neck simulation utilizing these concepts is presented.
KeywordsCervical Spine Head Motion Human Volunteer Angular Acceleration Angular Motion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.J. W. Melvin, J. H. McElhaney, and V. L. Roberts, “Improved Neck Simulation for Ant hropometric Dummies,” 16th Stapp Car Crash and Field Demonstration Conference Proceedings, SAE Paper No. 720958, 1972.Google Scholar
- 2.R. P. Delahaye, et. al., “Dynamic Radiology of the Cervical Spine of Flying Military Personnel: The Special Case of Jet Pilots,” Rev. Corps Santa Armes, 9: pp. 593–614, 1968.Google Scholar
- 3.C. A. Buck, F. B. Dameron, M. J. Dow and H. V. Skowlund, “Study of Normal Range of Motion in the Neck Utilizing a Bubble Goniometer,” Arch. Phys. Med., 40: pp. 390–392, 1959.Google Scholar
- 4.A. D. Glanville and G. Kreezer, “The Maximum Amplitude and Velocity of Joint Movement in Normal Male Human Adults,”Hum. Biol., 9: pp. 197–211, 1937.Google Scholar
- 5.J. J. Defibaugh, “Measurement of Head Motion. Part I: A Review of Methods of Measuring Joint Motion. Part II: An Experimntal Study of Head Motion in Adult Males.” Physical Therapy, 44: pp. 157–168, 1964.Google Scholar
- 6.S. K. Bhalla and E. H. Simmons, “Normal Ranges of Intervertebral-Joint Motion of Cervical Spine.” Canad. J. Surg., 12: pp. 181–187, 1969.Google Scholar
- 7.J. G. Bennett, L. E. Bergmanis, J. K. Carpenter and H. V. Skowlund, “Range of Motion of the Neck.”J. Amer. Phys. Ther. Assn., 43: pp. 4547, 1963.Google Scholar
- 8.J. W. Fielding, “Cineroentgenography of the Normal Cervical Spine, ”J. Bone Joint Surg., 39 A: pp. 1280–1288, 1957.Google Scholar
- 9.F. J. Kottke and M. 0. Mundale, “Range of Mobility of the Cervical Spine, ”Arch. Phys. Med., 40: pp. 379–382, 1959.Google Scholar
- 10.S. N. Bakke, “Roentgenologische Observations on the Movement of the Spinal Column,” Acta Radiol., Suppl. 13, 1931 (German).Google Scholar
- 11.C. L. Ewing and D. J. Thomas, “Human Head and Neck Response to Impact Acceleration,” NAMRL Monograph 21, USAARL 73–1, August 1972.Google Scholar
- 12.W. Lange, “Mechanical and Physiological Response of the Human Cervical Vertebral Column to Severe Impacts Applied to the Torso,” Symposium on Biodynamic Models and their Applications, AMRL-TR-71–29, December 1971.Google Scholar
- 13.H. J. 21, Mertz and L. M. Patrick, “Investigation of the Kinematics and Kinetics of Whiplash,” SAE Paper No. 670919, 1967.Google Scholar
- 14.H. J. Mertz and L. M. Patrick, “Strength and Response of the Human Neck,” 15th Stapp Car Crash and Field Demonstration Conference Proceedings, SAE Paper No. 710855, 1971.Google Scholar
- 15.C. C. Culver, R. F. Neathery and H. J. Mertz, “Mechanical Necks with Humanlike Responses,” 16th Stapp Car Crash and Field Demonstration Conference Proceedings, SAE Paper No. 720959, 1972.Google Scholar
- 16.T. D. Clarke, et. al., “Human Head Linear and Angular Accelerations During Impact,” 15th Stapp Car Crash and Field Demonstration Conference Proceedings, SAE Paper No. 710857, 1971.Google Scholar
- 17.R. F. Chandler and R. A. Christian, “Crash Testing of Humans in Automobile Seats,” SAE Paper No. 700361, 1970.Google Scholar