Factors Influencing Gripping Capacity of Chuck Jaws

  • A. Statham

Summary

This paper presents the results of an extensive programme of research into the factors affecting the gripping capacity of chuck jaws. Various parameters were investigated and from the experimental results a computer program has been produced, enabling the rapid establishment of the parameters giving the ‘best’ grip situation.

Keywords

Cast Iron Tangential Force Specimen Material Brake Torque Torque Transmission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Thornley R H and Wilson B (1972) A review of some of the principles involved in chuck design Production Engineer, 51, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Moiseev and Yu I (1981) How forces affect radial offset of parts set up in three jaw self aligning chucks Russian Eng. Journal, 60, 7, 44–45.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Kuznetsov and Yu N (1981) Developments in collet-type clamping mechanisms Soviet Engineering Research, 1, 2, 54–56.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Anon An objective comparison of the gripping pressure of the Pratt Garnet chuck (M-4976) and the Collet Mechanism SE-10682.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Goodchild N D (1982) A study of the dependence of the torque transmission capacity of chuck jaws on radial gripping force. B.Sc. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bowden F R and Tabor D (1950) The Friction and Lubrication of Solids Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Baker H J (1966) The applicability of flow pressure and hardness concepts in the estimation of workpiece retention and similar effects Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 6, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wilson B (1978) Workholding design philosophy and application Workholding and Toolholding for machine tools seminar. M.T.I.R.A.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kalajdzic M J and Soloja V B (1979) Rotational Speed Limits for basic types of chucks Annals of C.I.R.P. 297-301, January.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Rajeswaren R (1966) A study of some aspects of workholding and positioning in relation to indention and flow pressure M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Dawson D (1967) An investigation of idealised chuck jaw face form with relation to axial and tangential sliding M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Cadwallder J and Pandy P C (1973) The relation between the radial gripping force and the Torque-Transmission capacity of chuck jaws M.T.I.R.A. research report No. 49.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Bennett A P (1983) A wedge indentation model for the grip of a chuck jaw 24th M.T.D.R. Conf., 355-360.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Statham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering ProductionUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations