Analog Tape Recording

  • John Eargle

Abstract

Magnetic recording has shaped the evolution of contemporary recording in such a fundamental way that it is difficult to think of the creative process apart from the benefits of multitrack capability and ease of editing. The principle of magnetic recording has been known for over a century (14, 15), but the problems of noise and distortion kept it from being much more than a curiosity as far as studio recording was concerned. Highfrequency bias was discovered in the 1920s (2), and with it the nagging problems of noise and distortion were on their way to being solved. But the physical medium itself remained a problem, Earlier experiments had used steel ribbon and wire, with their concomitant handling problems.

Keywords

Record Head Magnetomotive Force Tape Transport Tape Speed Analog Tape 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    K. Benson, Audio Engineering Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York (1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Camras, Magnetic Recording Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Carlson et al., U.S. Patent 1, 640,881 (1927).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Eilers, “Development of a New Magnetic Tape for Music Mastering,” J. Audio Engineering Society, vol. 18, no. 5 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Ford, “Audio Tape Revisited,” Studio Sound, vol. 21, no. 4 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Griesinger, “Reducing Distortion in Analog Tape Recorders,” J. Audio Engineering Society, vol. 23, no. 2 (1975).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Jorgensen, The Complete Book of Magnetic Recording, TAB, Blue Ridge Summit, Pa. (1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Katz et al., “Alignment,” Recording Engineer/ Producer, vol. 6, no. 1 (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Kempler, “Making Tape,” Audio Magazine, (April 1975).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Lowman, Magnetic Recording, McGraw-Hill, New York (1972).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Mee and E. Daniel, Magnetic Recording, Volume III, McGraw-Hill, New York (1988).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Mills, “The New Generation of High Energy Recording Tape,” Recording Engineer/ Producer, vol. 5, no. 6 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. O’Connell, The Other Side of the Record, Alfred A. Knopf, New York (1948).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. Poulsen, “The Telegraphone: A Magnetic Speech Recorder,” Electrician, vol. 46, pp. 208#x2013;210 (1900).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. Smith, “Some Possible Forms of Phonograph,” Electrical World, vol. 12, pp. 116–117 (1888).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. Vogelgesang, “On the Intricacies of Tape Performance,” db Magazine, vol. 13, no. 1 (1979).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Woram, Handbook of Sound Recording, H. Sams, Indianapolis (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Eargle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations