Port (Harbor) Elements: Design Principles and Considerations

  • Gregory P. Tsinker

Abstract

As a part of a total transportation system, ports play a vital role in the, overall system efficiency. They provide a sufficient storage capacity in that a ship need not wait for its cargo from a train and similarly, a train need not wait for a ship in order to have a storage area to unload its contents. In other words, the port serves as a buffer between the two transportation modes.

Keywords

Splash Zone Cathodic Protection Mooring Line American Concrete Institute Marine Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acres International Limited, 1989. “Panama Canal Commission. Relocation of Launch/ Lindhandler Facilities,” Preliminary design, unpublished report.Google Scholar
  2. Agerschou, H. and Korsgaard, J., 1969. “System Analysis for Port Planning.” The Dock and Harbour Authority, March.Google Scholar
  3. Agerschou, H., Lundgren, H., Sorensen, T., Erust, T:, Korsgaard, J., Schmidt, L. R, Cm, W. K., 1983. Planning and Design of Ports and Marine Terminals. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Altowaiji, W. A. K., Darwin, D., and Donahey, R. C., 1984. “Preliminary Study of the Effect of Revibration on Concrete Bond Strength,” SL Report No 84–2, University of Kansas Center for Research, November.Google Scholar
  5. American Bureau OF Shipping, 1982. Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels. ABS, New York.Google Scholar
  6. American Concrete Institute, 1988. “ACI Workshop on Epoxy-Coated Reinforcement.” Concrete International, December.Google Scholar
  7. American Concrete Institute, ACI 201R, 1977. Guide to Durable Concrete. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.Google Scholar
  8. American Concrete Institute, ACI 223.1R, 1983. “Standard Practice for the Use of Shrinkage-Compensating Concrete.” Concrete International, January.Google Scholar
  9. American Concrete Institute, ACI 224R, 1980. Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.Google Scholar
  10. American Concrete Institute, ACI 304.2R, 1982. Placing Concrete by Pumping Methods. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.Google Scholar
  11. American Concrete Institute, ACI 305R, 1982. Hot Weather Concreting. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.Google Scholar
  12. American Concrete Institute, ACT 306R, 1988. “Cold Weather Concreting. ACI Materials Journal, July/August.Google Scholar
  13. American Concrete Institute, ACI’ 309.1R, 1981. Behavior of Fresh Concrete During Vi-bration. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.Google Scholar
  14. American Concrete Institute, ACT 309R, 1987. “Guide for Consolidation of Concrete.” ACI Materials Journal, September/October.Google Scholar
  15. American. Concrete Institute, ACI 311.4R, 1988. “Guide for Concrete Inspection.” ACI Materials Journal, July/August.Google Scholar
  16. American Concrete Institute, ACI 318, 1989. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.Google Scholar
  17. American Concrete Institute, ACI 377R, 1984. Guide for the Design and Construction of Fixed Offshore Structures: American Con-crete Institute, Detroit.Google Scholar
  18. American Concrete Institute, ACI 544, 1988. “Design Considerations on Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete.” ACI Structural Journal, September/October.Google Scholar
  19. American Iron And Steel Institute, 1981. Handbook of Corrosion Protection for Steel Pile Structures in Marine Environments. American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington.Google Scholar
  20. American Welding Society, Committee on Metalizing, 1974. “Corrosion Tests of Metalized Coated Steel,” Nineteen-Year Report, AWS C2. 14–74, AWS, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  21. Ankundinov V. et al., 1989. ’ Use of Simulators in Harbor and Waterway Development,“ ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference PORTS’89, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  22. ASAÍ, S., 1981. “Offshore Structures (Part II),” Paper presented at the ` 15th Annual Conference of International Iron and Steel Institute, Toronto, Canada, October 12–14.Google Scholar
  23. Baileys, R. T., 1995. “Timber Structures and the Marine Environment.” ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference PORTS’95, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  24. Balanin, V.,’ Byxov,’ L., Metelitsina, G., and Natalchishin, G., 1981. Pianc Proceedings 25th Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
  25. Bamfort, P. B., 1980. In Situ Measurement of the Effect of Partial Portland Cement Replacement Using Fly Ash or Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag, on the Performance of Mass Concrete,“ Proceedings Institute Civil Engineers, Part 2, London, September.Google Scholar
  26. Barber, P. and DOUGLAS, J. D., 1985. “The Use of Ship Simulators for the Appraisal and Validation of Channel Designs.” The Dock and Harbour Authority, September.Google Scholar
  27. Barrass, C. B., 1978. Ship Squat. Politech International, Luton, U.K.Google Scholar
  28. Beery, A. W., 1980. “Concrete in the Oceans.” Ciria/Ufg Technical Report No L Cement and Concrete Association,’ Wexham Springs.Google Scholar
  29. Berke, N. S., Weil, T. G., and Pfeifer, D. W., 1988. Concrete International, December.Google Scholar
  30. Berner, D. E., Haggerty, B., and Gerwick, B. C., 1989. “260 m Deep Tremie Concrete Placement for Belled Foundation Rehabilitation of the North Rankin `A’,” Proceedings Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, paper 6145.Google Scholar
  31. Berriman, J. W. and Herbich, J. B., 1977. “Port Improvement Design Criteria for Texas Coast.” ASCE Journal of the Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Division, November.Google Scholar
  32. Blaauw, H. G. and Van Der Knaap, 1983. “Prediction of Squat of Ships Sailing in Restricted Waters,” Proceedings of International Port Congress, Antwerpen.Google Scholar
  33. Brooks, K. M., 1993. “Literature Review and Assessment of the Potential Environmental Risks Associated with the Use of TreatedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood Products in Aquatic ‘Environments.“repared for Western Wood Preservative Institute, Vancouver, WA.Google Scholar
  35. Bruun, P., 1989. Port Engineering, 4th ed. Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  36. Bruun, P. and Smith O., 1991. “Economic Optimization of Breakwaters in Port Engineering.” The Dock and Harbours, December/January.Google Scholar
  37. Bsi, 1984. “British Standard Code of Practice for Maritime Structures,” Part I. General Criteria, British Standards Institution, BS6349, London. Additional Parts: Part 2-“Design of Quay;`Walls, Jetties and Dolphins ” Part 3-“Design of Dry Docks, Locks, Slipways and Shipbuilding Berths.” Part 4-“Design of Fendering and Mooring Systems” (1985).Google Scholar
  38. Cairns, J., 1994. “Performance of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcement at the Serviceability Limit State,” Proceedings Institute of Civil Engineers. Structures and Buildings, February.Google Scholar
  39. Campbell, N. P. and Zwamborn, J. A., 1984. “Richards Bay Harbor-Port Operational Manual, Mark 1.” Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, Bulletin No 45; Brussels.Google Scholar
  40. Channey, C. A., 1961. Marinas-Recommendations for Design, Construction and Maintenance. National Association of Engineers and Boat Manufacturers; Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Chellis, R. D., 1961. “Pile Foundations, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Constantine, T., 1960. “On the Movement of Ships in Restricted Waterways.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics; Manchester University; UK. CoRNIcK, H. F.,’ 1969. Dock and Harbour Engineering. Charles Griffin and Co. Limited, London.Google Scholar
  43. Craig, R. J., 1983. “Design Procedures for Fibrous Concrete-Shear, Moment and Torsion,” Proceedings of Conference on Structural Concrete Design, New Jersey Institute of Technology, MayGoogle Scholar
  44. Cushing, C. R., 1989. “Vessels of Future: A Naval Architect’s Viewpoint.” PIANC Bulletin No. 66, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  45. Daggett, L. L., 1995. “Marine Simulation Capabilities for Channel Design,” ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference Ports’95, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  46. Dann, I. W. and Ferguson, A. M., 1973. “The Squat of Full Ships in Shallow Water.” The Naval Architect, October.Google Scholar
  47. Dand, I. W., 1981. “An Approach to the Design of Navigation Channels.” National Maritime Institute Report R104, May.Google Scholar
  48. Davy, Sir Humphry, 1824–1825. “On the Corrosion of Copper Sheeting and Ships by Seawater and a Method for Protecting the Effect.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Vols. 114 and 115.Google Scholar
  49. Delft Hydraulics Laboratory, 1984. “Tests on the Controllability of LNG Carriers in Shallow Waters,” Delft Report M1967 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  50. Dickson, A. F., 1969. “Trends in Vessel Type and Size-Liquid Cargoes,” The.Institution of Civil Engineers, Proceedings of Conference Tanker and Bulk Carrier Terminals.Google Scholar
  51. Dzhunkovski, N. N., Kasperson, A. A,, Smirnov, G. N., and Smorova, A. G., 1964. Ports and Port Structures, Vol. 1 (in Russian). Stroyisdat Publishing House, Moscow.Google Scholar
  52. EAU, 1990. Recommendations of the Committee for Waterfront Structures, Eau 1990: Comm. for Waterfront Structures, Soc. for Harbor Eng’g. and The German Soc. for Soil Mech’s and Foundation Eng’g., 4th English translation. Wilhelm Ernst and Sohn, Berlin.Google Scholar
  53. Eckardstein, K E., 1983. Pumping Concrete and Concrete Pumps. Publisher SCHWING, Herne, Gei many.Google Scholar
  54. Eden,, E. W., 1971. “Vessel Controllability in Restricted Waters,” ASCE Journal of Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering, Vol’ 97, March.Google Scholar
  55. Eisiminger, S. K., 1953. “Widening and Deepening the Columbia and Willamette Rivers.” The Dock and ’ Harbour Authority No 34, February.Google Scholar
  56. Eryujzlu, N. E., CAO, Y. L., and D’agnolo, F., 1994. “Under Keel Requirements for Large Vessels in Shallow Waterways,” Proceedings ‘28th Congress Pianc.Google Scholar
  57. Eyre, J. L., 1989. “The Containerships of 1999.” Pianc Bulletin No. 66.Google Scholar
  58. Farr, A. K., 1986. “Soil Quality Testing: Why?” American Society of Civil Engineers, Specialty Conference Ports’86, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  59. FIP, 1985. “Recommendations for the Design and Construction of Concrete Sea Structures.” Federation Internationale de la Precon trainte, London.Google Scholar
  60. Feld, J., 1968. Construction Failures. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Ferguson, E. S., 1992. Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  62. Ferguson, E. S., 1993. “How Engineers Lose Touch,” American Heritage Invention and Technology, Winter Issue.Google Scholar
  63. Focht, J. A. Jr., 1994. “Lessons Learned from Missed Predictions,” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No 10, August.Google Scholar
  64. Forssblad, L., 1987. Need for Consolidation of Super-plasticized Concrete Mixes. American Concrete Institute, Detroit.Google Scholar
  65. Fuehrer, M., Römish, K,, and Engelke, G.; 1981. “Criteria for Dimensioning the Bottom and Slope Protections and for Applying the New Methods of Protecting Navigation ‘Canals,” Pianc Proceedings 25th Congress„ Edin-burgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
  66. Fueeper, M. and Romish, K:, 1982–1983. The Effects of Hydrodynamic Forces on Ships Navigating through Canals:“ ‘A Contribution to an Estimation of the Maneuverability of Ships in a Restricted ’Channel, PIANC, Bulletin No 43.Google Scholar
  67. Ffugl-Meyer, H.’, 1957. The Modern Port. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  68. Fuller, K. N. G., Gregory, M. J:, HARRIS, J. A., MÚHR, A H., ROBERTS„’ A. D., and STEVENSON A., 1988. “Engineering Use of Natural Rub-’ ber,” Natural Rubber Science and Technol ogy,Roberts A. D. (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  69. Gaynor, R D., 1992. “Current Research at NRMCA,” Concrete Products, AprilGoogle Scholar
  70. Gaythwaite, J. W, 1981. The Marine Environ ment and Structural Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.Google Scholar
  71. Gaythwaite, J. W., 1990. “Design of Marine Facilities for the Berthing, Mooring and Repair of Vessels.” Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.Google Scholar
  72. Gerwick, B. C., 1975. “Durability of Structure Under Water,” Proceedings AIPC-PIP-Google Scholar
  73. Ceb-Rilem-Iass Symposium on Behavior of Concrete Structures in Service, Liege, June.Google Scholar
  74. Ger`Vvick, B. C., 1976. “Materials for Concrete Ships: Durability and Corrosion Protection Coating, Inspection, and Repair,” Proceedings of the Conference on Concrete Ships and Floating Structures, Berkeley, CA, September.Google Scholar
  75. Gerwick, B. C., 1986. Construction of Offshore Structures. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Gerwick, B. C., 1990. “International Experience in the Performance of Marine Concrete.” Concrete International, MayGoogle Scholar
  77. Gjory, O. E., 1971. “Long-Time Durability of Concrete in Seawater.” ACI Journal, January.Google Scholar
  78. Goldstein, G., 1983. “Australian Coal Terminal Operates Happily Beside Residential Area.” Civil Engineering, Vol. 53, No 12.Google Scholar
  79. Gorsha, R. P., 1992. “Air Loss in Free-Falling Concrete:” Concrete International, August.Google Scholar
  80. Gower, E., 1982. “Could Ekki be Used to Deck Logging Bridges?” Logging and Sawmilling Journal, January.Google Scholar
  81. Grahant, J. S., 1983. “Design of Pressure-Treated Wood Bulkheads,” Proceedings ASCE Specialty Conference on the Design, Construc tion, Maintenance and Performance of Coastal Structures, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
  82. Gpahaivi, J. _S., 1985. “Allowable Compressive Design Stresses for Pressure-Treated Round Timber Foundation Piling,” Presented before the AWPA, Reno, NV.Google Scholar
  83. Gpothaus, W. and Ripley, D. M., 1958: “St. Lawrence Seaway, 1958, 27 ft Canals and Channels.” ASCE Journal of the Waterways and Harbors Division, Vol’.’ 87, No 1.’Google Scholar
  84. Gan’, R. H. and Kiely, W. L., 1977. The World’s Largest Single Point Mooring Terminals: Design and Construction of the Salm System for 750 000 DWT Tankers,“ Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX,, May.Google Scholar
  85. Guest, F. E. and Pizzariello, A. M., 1989. “Designing Harbor and Waterway Channels Using Marine Simulators.” Piano Bulletin No. 66.Google Scholar
  86. Haatainen, P., 1978. “Experimental Investigation on the Squat in Changing Water DepthGoogle Scholar
  87. Conditions,“ Ships Hydrodynamic Laboratory, Report No 14, Otaniemi, Finland. HANEMAN, W. M., 1994: ”Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation.“ Journaof Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, No 4.Google Scholar
  88. Hanks, A. N., 1977. “Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Properties and Resurfacing ’ Applications,” Portland Cement Association BulletinGoogle Scholar
  89. Harvey, H. H„ 1980. “Permeability of Concrete in Seawater,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Performance of Concrete in Marine Environments, St. Andrews-by-theSea, Canada, August.Google Scholar
  90. Haskell, A. J., 1989. “Barges and Vessels for the Domestic Ocean Trade. PIANC Bulletin No 69.Google Scholar
  91. Hawkes, P. J., 1985. “Hindwave-A Wave Hindcasting Method,” Hydraulics Research Report IT 288.Google Scholar
  92. Headland, J. R., 1995a. “Probabilistic Design of Navigation Channel Depths.” ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference PORTS’95, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  93. Headland, J. R., 1995b. “Floating Breakwaters,” Marine Structures Engineering: Specialized Applications. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  94. Heikkilä, M. 1990. The Evaluation of Manoeuvrability through a Narrow Strait using a Full-Bridge Shiphandling Simulator. MARSIM and ICSM’90, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  95. Henager, C. H., 1977. “Ultimate Strength of Reinforced Steel Fibrous Concrete Beams,” Proceedings of Conference on Fiber-Reinforced Materials: Design and Engineering Applications, Institute of Civil Engineers, London.Google Scholar
  96. Henager, C. H. and Doherty, T. J., 1976. “Analysis of Reinforced Fibrous Concrete Beams.” Proceedings of ASCE, Vol.,12, Paper ST-1.Google Scholar
  97. Herbich, J. B., 1992. “Dredged Navigation Channels,” Handbook of Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol.’ 3, Herbich, J. B. (ed.), Gulf Publishing House, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  98. Hoff, G. C., 1976–1982. “Selected Bibliography on Fiber Reinforced Cement and Concrete,” Miscellaneous Paper No. C-76–6 and Supplements 1–4, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg. Also Chapter 9 Report No. 1 FHWA-RD-77–110, Vol. 2, Federal Highway Administration DC.Google Scholar
  99. Hooft, J. P., 1974. The Behavior of a Ship in Head Waves at Restricted Water Depths.“ International Ship Building Progress, Vol. 21, No. 244.Google Scholar
  100. Hoppe, J. J., 1992. “Air Loss in Free-Falling Concrete.” Concrete International, June.Google Scholar
  101. Horvick, E. W., 1964. “Specifications and Specifying.” American Zinc Institute, Inc., Technical Seminar, New York, May.Google Scholar
  102. Huuska, O., 1976. “On the Evaluation of Under-keel Clearances in Finnish Waterways,” Ship Hydrodynamics Laboratory Report No. 9, Otaniemi, Finland.Google Scholar
  103. Ibbetson, C.,,1987. “Pre-cooling Concrete with Liquid Nitrogen.” Civil Engineering, June.Google Scholar
  104. International Standards Organization, 1983. “Roll-on/Roll-off’ Ship to Shore Connection,” ISO 6812–1983, Geneva.Google Scholar
  105. Johnson, B. R., 1987. Timber Bulkheads, Geotechnical Special Publication No 7, ASCE, New York.Google Scholar
  106. Jones, R. M., 1989. `Bulk Ships for the 1990s.“ PIANC Bulletin No 66.Google Scholar
  107. Khanna, J. and Soreivsen, T., 1980. “Stand-Off Force on Ships Moored in Strong Current,” American Society of Civil Engineers Proceedings of Specialty Conference ‘PORTS’80, Norfolk, VA.Google Scholar
  108. Krmon, P. M.,’ 1982. “Underkeel Clearance in ‘Ports,” Ship Transport Symposium, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  109. Knott, M. A.’(ed.),’ 1989. Vessel Traffic Controls Systems, ASCE Task Committee on Systems for Controlling Vessel Traffic. Proceedings of Specialty Conference Ports’89. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  110. Kolek, J., 1963. “Research on the Vibration of Fresh Concrete, Proceedings of Conference on Vibration-Compaction Techniques, Budapest.Google Scholar
  111. Kray, C. J., 1970. “Supership Effect on Waterway Depth and Alignments.” ASCE Journal of the Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, Vol. 96, No. WW2.Google Scholar
  112. Kray, C. J., 1972. “Closure to Supership Effect on Waterway Depth and Alignments,” ASCE Design Principles and Considerations of Port Elements Journal of Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering, Vol. 96, MayGoogle Scholar
  113. Kray, C. J., 1973. “Design of Ship Channels and Maneuvering Areas,” ASCE Journal of the Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, Vol. 99, No WW1.Google Scholar
  114. Laforge, E. and Vaivtorre, M., 1984. “Application on Manoeuvering Simulation Techniques for Dimensioning Quay Wall Fenders,” PIANC Proceedings 28th Congress, Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
  115. Libby, J. R., 1984. Modern Prestressed Concrete. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.Google Scholar
  116. Lorenz, L. F. and Gj0vix, L. R., 1972. Analyzing Creosote by Gas Chromatography: Relationship to Creosote Specifications. Awpa 1972 Proceedings, Vol. 68.Google Scholar
  117. Malx0tra, V. M., 1986. “Mechanical Properties and Freeze/Thaw Resistance of Condensed Silica Fume Concrete,” American Concrete Institute ACI SP-91, Vol: 2.Google Scholar
  118. Mcgee, S. E. and Vann, R. G., 1984. “Determining Channel Design Requirements for Norfolk Harbor and Channels Deepening Project.” The Dock and Harbor Authority, July.Google Scholar
  119. Mcnown, J. S., 1976. “Sinkage’ and Resistance for Ships in Channels.” ASCE Journal of the Waterways, Ports, Coastal and Ocean Division,` Vol. 102, August.Google Scholar
  120. Mehta, P. K, 1980a. “Durability of Concrete in Marine Environments. A Review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Performance of Concrete in Marine Environments, St. Andrews, Canada, August.Google Scholar
  121. Mehta, P. K., 1980b. “Durability of Concrete in Marine Environments,” American Concrete Institute, ACI SP-65, Detroit.Google Scholar
  122. Mehta, P. K., 1988. “Durability of Concrete Exposed to Marine Environment-A Fresh Look,” Proc. 2nd International Conference on Concrete in Marine Environment, St. Andrews-by-the-Sea, Canada.Google Scholar
  123. Mehta, P. K. and Gerwick, B. C., 1982. “Cracking-Corrosion Interaction in the Concrete Exposed to Marine Environments.” Concrete International, October.Google Scholar
  124. Minikin, R. R., 1961. Winds, Waves and Maritime Structures, 2nd ed. Charles Griffin and Co. Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  125. Moser, D. A., YOE, C., and Hill, D. J., 1995. “Estimating the Economic Value of Risk Reduction from Deep Draft Channel Widening,” ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference PORTS’95, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  126. Munro, E., 1985. “Concrete Durability in a Free Market System.” Cement Imagination, Vol. 17, No 3.Google Scholar
  127. National ASSOCIATION OF CORROSION ENGINEERS: (revised 1983). “Recommended Practice. Corrosion Control of Steel, Fixed Offshore Platforms Associated with Petroleum Production,” Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  128. Navfac, 1980–1986. Piers and Wharves Design Manual 25.1, Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering CommandGoogle Scholar
  129. Navfac DM-25.1 (1980). Alexandria, VA. Additional Parts:Google Scholar
  130. DM 25.2 “Dockside Utilities for Ship Service” DM 25.3 “Cargo Handling Facilities” (1981) DM 25.4 “Seawalls, Bulkheads and Quay Walls” (1981)Google Scholar
  131. DM 25.5 “Ferry Terminals Berthing Facilities” (1981)Google Scholar
  132. DM 25.6 “General Criteria for Waterfront Construction”Google Scholar
  133. Harbors,“ Design Manual 26.1, Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineer-mg Command, Navfac Facilities Engineer-Mg Command, NAVFAC.Google Scholar
  134. DM 26.1 Alexandria, VA. (1981). Additional Parts:Google Scholar
  135. DM 26.2 “Coastal Protection” (1982) DM 26.3 “Coastal Sedimentation and Dredging”Google Scholar
  136. DM 26.4 “Fixed Moorings” (1986) DM 26.5 “Fleet Moorings” (1985) DM 26.6 “Mooring Design Physical and Em pirical Data” (1986).Google Scholar
  137. Navfac DM-26.1, 1981. Harbors, Design Man-ual DM-26. 1. Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Command, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  138. Oliver, J. G., 1992. “Floating Breakwaters,” ASCE Specialty Conference PORTS’92, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  139. Oshiro,’ T. and TANIGAWA, S., 1988. “Effect of Surface Coatings on the Durability of Concrete Exposed to Marine Environment,” Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Concrete in Marine Environment, St. Andrews-by-the-Sea, Canada.Google Scholar
  140. Owen, M. W. and Allsop, N. W. H., 1983. “Hydraulic Modeling of Rubble-Mound Breakwaters,” Proceedings of Conference on Breakwaters Design and Construction, Institution of Civil Engineers, London.Google Scholar
  141. Peabody, A. W., 1967. “Control of Pipeline Corrosion.” NACE, December.Google Scholar
  142. PEEL, J., 1982. “Corrosion in Concrete-A `Chemical’ Solution.” Engineering Digest, Vol. 2, No 10.Google Scholar
  143. Permanent International Association OF Navigation Congresses, 1978. Report of the International Commission for the Standardization of Roll-on/Roll-off Ships and their Berths.Google Scholar
  144. Permanent International Association OF Navigation Congresses, 1979. Report of Working Group I. Supplement to Bulletin No 32.Google Scholar
  145. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1980. Report of Working Group IV “Reception of Large Ships.” Supple-ment to Bulletin No 35.Google Scholar
  146. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1982/1983. ` Navigation in Muddy Areas,“ Supplement to Bulletin No 73.Google Scholar
  147. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1984a. Report of the International Commission for ` Ïmproving the Design of Fender Systems. Supplement to Bulletin No 45.Google Scholar
  148. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1984b. “Classification of Soils and Rocks to be Dredged.” Supplement to Bulletin No 47.Google Scholar
  149. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1985a. “Underkeel Clearance for Large Ships in Maritime Fairways with Hard Bottom, Report of a Work-mg Group of the Permanent Technical Committee’ II. Supplement to Bulletin No 51.Google Scholar
  150. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1985b. “Dangerous’ Goods in Ports Recommendations for Port Designers and Port Operators,” Report of a Working Group of the Permanent Technical Committee II. Supplement to Bulletin No. 49.Google Scholar
  151. Permanent International Association of Navi-Cation Congresses, 1987. “Development of Modern Marine Terminals ” Supplement to Bulletin No. 56.Google Scholar
  152. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1989. “Economic’ Methods of Channel Maintenance,” Supplement to Bulletin No 67.Google Scholar
  153. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1992a. “Capability of Ship Manoeuvring Simulation Models for Approach Channels and Fairways in Harbours.” Supplement to Bulletin No 77.Google Scholar
  154. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1992b. “Guidelines for the Design and Construction of Flexible Revetments Incorporating Geotextiles in Marine Environment.” Supplement to Bulletin 78 /79.Google Scholar
  155. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1994. “A Practical Guide for Design and Construction of Floating Breakwaters.”Google Scholar
  156. Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses, 1995. “Approach Channels. Preliminary Guidelines.” Supplement to Bulletin No. 87.Google Scholar
  157. Petroski, H., 1984. The Engineer is Human. The Role of Failure in Successful Design, St. Martin’s Press, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  158. Phri, 1980. Technical Standards for Port and Harbor Facilities in Japan. The Overseas Coast Area Dev. ’ Inst. of Japan, Bureau of Ports and Harbors, Ministry of Transport, Port and Harbor Research Institute, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  159. Port Autonome de Marseille, 1976. “Mesures de Squat en vraie Gradeur,” Rupport non public.Google Scholar
  160. Quinn, A. Def., 1972. Design and Construction of Ports and Marine Structures, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  161. Ramakrishnan, V., 1988. “Materials and Properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete. Civil Engineering, AprilGoogle Scholar
  162. Rasheeduzzafar et al., 1992. “Performance of Corrosion Resisting Steels in Chloride-Bearing Concrete.” Concrete International, September-October.Google Scholar
  163. Read, J. A., 1987. “Rebar Corrosion-Coating a Cure?” Civil Engineering, October/ November.Google Scholar
  164. Reed, W. B., 1980. “Delivering Oil Where It’s Needed,” Proceedings ASCE Specialty Conference PORTS’80, Norfolk, VA.Google Scholar
  165. Ribadeau-Dumas, L., 1982. “Squat,” Revue Tech- nique des Phares et Balises, No 53, March.Google Scholar
  166. Roseman, D. P. and Jakobsen, B. K., 1986. “Port Design and Ship Characteristics,” ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference PORT’86, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  167. Schijf, J. B., 1949. Proceedings Permanent International Association Navigation Congresses, 17th Congress, Section 1, Communication 2. Lisboa (in French).Google Scholar
  168. Schupack, M., 1982. “Design of Permanent Seawater Structures to Prevent Deterioration.” Concrete International, March.Google Scholar
  169. Seymour, R. J., 1977. “Estimating Wave Generating on Restricted Fetches.” ASCE Journal of the Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Division, Vol. 103, MayGoogle Scholar
  170. Shah S. P. and Batson, G. B., (eds.), 1987. “Fiber Reinforced Concrete-Properties and Applications,” ACI Sp-105, Detriot.Google Scholar
  171. Shah, A. P. and Skarendahl, A. (ed.), 1986. Steel Fiber Concrete Elsevier Applied Science Publishers London.Google Scholar
  172. Sharma, A. K., 1986. “Shear Strength of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams ” American Concrete Institute Journal, Vol. 83, No 4.Google Scholar
  173. Singleton, W. T. Jr., 1970. “Performance’ of Various Coating Systems in a Marine Environment.” Materials Protection and Performance, Vol. 9, No 11.Google Scholar
  174. Smallman, J. V., 1986. The Use of Physical and Computational Models in the Hydraulic Design of Coastal Harbours,“ Pianc Bulletin No 53.Google Scholar
  175. Smirnov, G. N., Gorunov, B. F., Kurlovich, E. B., Levachev, C. H., and Sidorova, A. G., 1979. Ports and Port Structures (in Russian). Stroyisdat Publishing Co., Moscow.Google Scholar
  176. Sorensen, R. M., 1966. “Ship Waves,” Technical Report HEL-12–2, Hydraulics Engineering Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  177. Sorensen, R. M., 1977. “Procedures for Preliminary Analysis of Tidal Inlet Hydraulics and Stability,” Coastal Engineering Technical Aid No. 77–8. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA.Google Scholar
  178. Soros, P., Koman, B., and Lubetkin, M., 1986. “Innovative Bulk Ports in Latin America.” The Dock and Harbour Authority, December.Google Scholar
  179. Soviet Standards: 1-Inland waterway hydraulic structures SNiP II-50–74 (1974)Google Scholar
  180. Soviet Standards: 2-Seaport hydraulic structures SNiP II-51–74 (1974)Google Scholar
  181. Soviet Standards: 3-Wave, ice and ship loadings on hydraulic structures SNiP II-57–75 (1975) Stroyisdat Publisher, Moscow.Google Scholar
  182. Söhngen, B., 1995. “The Effects of Wind on the Design of Canals,” PIANO, Bulletin No 88.Google Scholar
  183. Span, H. J. TH., et al., 1981. “A Review of Relevant Hydraulic Phenomena and of Recent Developments in Research, Design and Construction of Protective Works,” PIANC Proceedings 25th Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
  184. Swendsen, I. A. and Jensen, V., 1970. “The Form and Dimensions of Fender Front Structures.” The Dock and Harbour Authority, June.Google Scholar
  185. Tedesco, A., 1994. “Computer Analysis of No Substitute for Experience.” Civil Engineering, February.Google Scholar
  186. Termpol Code, 2nd ed., 1983. Canadian Coast Guard, Ottowa.Google Scholar
  187. The Dock And Harbour Authority, 1982a. A Wide Choice of Fender Designs, March.Google Scholar
  188. The Dock And Harbour Authority,;1982b. Expanding Range of Fender Designs Google Scholar
  189. Thevenot, M. M., 1992. “Evaluation of Width Criteria for Deep-Draft Channels Using Computer Simulation,” ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference PORTS’92, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  190. Thiele, A., 1901. Shiffswiderstand ouf Kanalen Centralblatt der Bauver-Waltung, No 56.Google Scholar
  191. Thoresen, C. A., 1988. Port Design. Tapir Publishers, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
  192. Treadaway, K. W. J., Cox, R. N., and Brown, B. L., 1989. “Durability of Corrosion Resisting Steels in Concrete, Proceedings of Institute of Civil Engineers, Part 1, London, April.Google Scholar
  193. Trujens, C. L., Wagenaar, W. A., and Vanwijn, 1980. “The Effect of Contracted Timescales on the Learning Ability for Manoeuvring of Large Ships,” Netherlands Ship Research Centre, TNO, Report 215, December.Google Scholar
  194. Tsinker, G. P., 1983. “Anchored Sheet-Pile Bulkheads: Design Practice.” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 109, No. 8. 240 Design Principles and Considerations of Port `ElementsGoogle Scholar
  195. Tsinker, G. P., 1986. Floating Ports. Design and Construction Practices. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  196. Tsinker, G. P., 1995. Marine Structures Engineering: Specialized Applications, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  197. Tunic, E. O., 1965. “Shallow’ Water Flows Past Slender Obstacles.” Report by David Taylor Model Basin, Washington, DC, December.Google Scholar
  198. Tuck, E. O. and Taylor, J. P., 1972. “Shallow Wave Problem in Ship Hydrodynamics.” University of Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  199. Turner, F. H., ‘1974. The Contranstor Concept for ` Cryogenic Carriers.“ Ocean Industry, November.Google Scholar
  200. Turner,’ H. O. Jr., 1984. “Dimensions for Safe and Efficient Deep-Draft Navigation Channels, Technical Report HL-84–10, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.Google Scholar
  201. Tuthill, L. H.,,1988. “Lasting Concrete in a Sulfate Environment:” Concrete International, December.Google Scholar
  202. United Kingdom’s National Maritime Institute (NMI), 1981; London.Google Scholar
  203. U.K. Department of Transport, 1982. ’’ Ship Behavior in Ports and Their Approaches. U.K. Department of Transport, London.Google Scholar
  204. United Nations Conference on Trade and De-Velopment (Unctad), 1973. Berth Throughput, Systematic Method for Improving General Cargo Operators. United Nations, New York.’Google Scholar
  205. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (Unctad), 1978. Port Development, A Handbook for Planners in Developing Countries, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
  206. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ` 1983. ``Hydraulic Design of Deep–Draft Navigation Pro jests,“ EM110–2–1613 Headquarters Department of the Army„ Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  207. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1984. “Shore Protection Manual” Volumes 1 and 2. Department of the Army, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  208. U.S. National Research Council, 1992. “Shiphandling Simulation—Application to Waterway Design,” Washington, DC., National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  209. U.S. National Research Council (Marine Board), 1981. “Problems and Opportunities in the Design of Entrance to Port and Harbors,” Panel Report, Wiegel, R. R., Chairman, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  210. Van De Kaa, E. J., 1977. “Discussion of Sinkage and Resistance for Ships in Channels.” ASCE Journal of the Waterways, Ports, Coastal and Ocean Division, Vol. 103, August.Google Scholar
  211. Van De Kaa, E. J., 1984. “Safety Criteria, for Channel Depth Design,” Third Meeting of the U.S.–Dutch M.O.U. on Dredging and Related Technologies, Charleston, SC.Google Scholar
  212. Van Der Meer, J. W. and Stam, C.-J. M:, 1992. “Wave Runup on Smooth and Rock Slopes of Coastal Structures.” ASCE Journal of Waterways, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 5.Google Scholar
  213. Van Wijk, A. ‘C., 1982. “Wave Induced Ship Motions in Harbour Entrances, a Field Study,” Proceedings I. C.C.E., Cape Town.Google Scholar
  214. Vickerman, M. J., 1992. “The Influence of Future Vessel Design on Ports,” ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference PORTS’92.Google Scholar
  215. Vincent, G., 1989. “Breakwater Choices.”’ Civil Engineering, July.Google Scholar
  216. Vlemmix, W. et al., 1985: “Reception and Discharge of Large Coal Carriers, Permanent International Association of Navigation Con-gresses, Proceedings of 26th Congress;’, Section I I, Subject I, Brussels.Google Scholar
  217. Wade, M. J. et aL., 1987. Summary? Evaluation of the Environmental Impact Resulting from the Use of Creosoted Pilings in the Historic Restoration of Pier No 2 at the Charlestown Navy Yard. Final Report to U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  218. Wadwa, L. C., 1992. “Planning Operations of Bulk Loading Terminals by ° Simulation.” ASCE Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 118, No 3.Google Scholar
  219. Wagenaar, W. A. and Micron, J A., 1968. “The Effect ` of Contracted Timescales in Scale Model Manoeuvering,” Institute of Perception, TNO, Report, IZF, C3, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  220. Webb, D. A. and Gjovik, L. R., 1988, Treated Wood Products, Their Effect on the Environment. American Wood-Preservers’ Association.Google Scholar
  221. Webb, J. C., 1982. “The LOOP Project: Taking the Port to the Ship.” ASCE Civil Engineering, June.Google Scholar
  222. Webb, D. W., 1995. “San Juan Harbor Navigation Channel Design” ASCE Proceedings Specialty Conference PORTS’95, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
  223. Weis, J. M. and Blancato, V., 1959. “Breasting Dolphin for Berthing Supertankers.” ASCE Journal of the Waterways and Harbours.Google Scholar
  224. WESTERN-European Institute For Wood-Preservation, 1987. Minutes of the 37th Meeting of the General Assembly, Portschach, Austria.Google Scholar
  225. Whiteneck, L. L. and Hockney, L. A., 1989. Structural Materials for Harbor and Coastal Construction. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  226. Wicker, C. F. (ed.), 1965. “Evaluation of Present State of Knowledge of Factors Affecting Tidal Hydraulics and Related Phenomena,” Report No. 3 Committee on Tidal Hydraulics, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
  227. Williamsón, G. R., 1978. “Steel Fibers as Web Reinforcement in Reinforced Concrete,” Proceedings of U.S. Army Science Conference, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  228. Windler, F. J., 1983. “The Corrosion Survey —An Engineer’s Guide to Maintenance Painting.” Material Performance, Vol. 22, No 5.Google Scholar
  229. Wood, J. S., Khanna, J., and Dembinski, M., 1981. “Design of an Offshore Berth for Mooring Large Ships in a Strong Current,” Proceedings of Permanent International Association of Navigation of Congresses, 26th Congress, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  230. Wright, J., Child, T. J., Rebel, J. M., and Robertson, J., 1987. “Port Bonython Jetty, South Australia,” Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineers, October.Google Scholar
  231. Yaron, S. L. and Shimoni, J., 1982. “`The Hadera Offshore Coal Unloading Terminal: A New Approach to Unloading of Bulk in the Open Sea,” Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May.Google Scholar
  232. Yingling, J., Mullings, G. M.,’ and Gainor, R. D., 1992. “Loss of Air Content in Pumped Concrete.” Concrete International, October.Google Scholar
  233. Youndale, J. E. and Shrivastava, S. M., 1986. “Design and Construction of Marine Facilitiesfor Ridley Island Coal Terminal,” Proceedings Asce Specialty Conference PORTS’86, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory P. Tsinker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations