Utilization of Aquatic Biomass for Wastewater Treatment

  • G. Lakshman
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 67)

Abstract

Municipal effluents from the U.S.A. and Canada generate annually more than 400,000 tonnes of phosphorus and nitrogen, a large portion of which is dumped directly into surface waters with little or no treatment. Rapid deterioration of water quality due to algal blooms and nuisance vegetation stimulated by the flow of these nutrients has reduced the usefulness of surface waters for recreation and human consumption rather alarmingly in recent decades. Eutrophication of freshwater lakes and the increasing need to treat water supplies before consumption have had undesirable socio-economic impacts all over North America. It has been well documented that the removal of phosphorus and nitrogen at the source is the most effective means of assuring that this trend does not continue unabated. While most urban centres can possibly afford advanced physicochemical treatment systems, thousands of towns and small communities in the developed world can support only the conventional lagoon treatment, hardly a solution to the ubiquitous problem.

Keywords

Aquatic Biomass Corn Stover Water Hyacinth Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Refuse Derive Fuel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lakshman, G. 1979. An Ecosystem Approach to the Treatment of Wastewaters. J. Environ. Qual. 8: (3): 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Lakshman, G. 1981. A Demonstration Project at Humboldt to Provide Tertiary Treatment to the Municipal Effluent Using Aquatic Plants, Saskatchewan Research Council, Publication No. E-820–4-E-81.Google Scholar
  3. Lakshman, G. 1982a. Natural and Artificial Ecosystems for the Treatment of Wastewaters, Saskatchewan Research Council, Publication No. E-820–7-E-82.Google Scholar
  4. Lakshman, G. 1982b. A Demonstration Project at Humboldt to Provide Tertiary Treatment to the Municipal Effluent Using Aquatic Plants, Final Report, Saskatchewan Research Council, Publication No. E-820–11-B-82.Google Scholar
  5. National Academy of Sciences. 1976. Making Aquatic Weeds Useful: Some Perspectives for Developing Countries. Advisory Committee on Technology Innovation, Natl. Acad. of Sci., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Seidel, K. 1973. Macrophytes and Water Purification. Verh. Int. Verein Limnol. 18: 109–121.Google Scholar
  7. Tourbier, J., and R.W. Pierson, Jr. (Eds.). 1976. Biological Control of Water Pollution. Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  8. Wolverton, B.C., and R.C. McDonald. 1975. Water Hyacinths for Upgrading Sewage lagoons to Meet Advanced Wastewater Treatment Standards. Part I, NASA Technical Memo. TM-X-72729.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Lakshman
    • 1
  1. 1.30 Campus DriveSaskatchewan Research CouncilSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations