Advertisement

Body Size, Shape and Composition Analysis of Weightlifters and Variables Discriminating Them According to Performance and Age

  • E. Orvanova
  • L. Uher
  • M. Slamka
  • L. Pataki
  • L. Ramacsay
Chapter

Abstract

It is evident that differences will exist in body size, shape and composition between participants in different sports events: clearly, these are often the factors which determine participation in a particular discipline.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakytova, H., Ugron, M., Kontsekova, O., 1975, Zaklady statistiky, Alfa, Bratislava.Google Scholar
  2. Berms, J., Hebbelinck, M., Carter, J.E.L., Ross, W.D. and Lariviére, G., 1979, Standardization of basic anthropometry in olympic athletes The Mogap Procedure, in: Methods of Functional Anthropology, V. Novotny, S. Titlbachova (eds), Universita Kar-lova, Praha.Google Scholar
  3. Carter, J.E.L., 1974, Physical anthropology of the athletes, in: Genetic and Anthropological Studies of Olympic Athletes, A.L. de Garay, L. Levine, J.E.L. Carter (eds), Academic Press, Inc., New York, San Francisco, London.Google Scholar
  4. Carter, J.E.L., 1975, The Heath-Carter somatotype method, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  5. Chovanova, E., Bergman, P., Stukovsky, R., 1981, Podiel dedicnosti na formovani somatotypu, Sbornik vedecke rady UV CSTV, 12: 218Google Scholar
  6. Chovanova, E., Pataki, L., Vavrovic, D., 1983, Somatotypologicka charekteristika mladych vzpieracov, Teor. Praxe. tel. Vych., 1: 32Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, W.J., 1968, BMD - Biomedical Computer Programs, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  8. Drinkwater, D.T., Ross, W.D., 1980, Anthropometric fractionation of body mass, in: Kinanthropometry II, International Series on Sport, Vol. 9, M. Ostyn, G. Beunen, J. Simons (eds), University Park Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  9. Duquet, W., Hebbelinck, M., 1977, Application of the Somatotype attitudinal distance to the study of group and individual somatotype status and relations, in: Growth and Development; Physique, Symp. Biol. Hung., 20, 0. Eiben (ed) Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.Google Scholar
  10. Rao, C.R., 1965, Linear methods of statistical induction and their applications, Willey and sons, Inc. New York.Google Scholar
  11. Slamka, M., Chovanova, E., Ramacsay, L., Uher, L., 1983, Correction of the weight of the main body components in the anthropometric fractionation of the body mass, Anthropo.ogie, 2, Anthropos Institute, BrnoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Orvanova
    • 1
  • L. Uher
    • 1
  • M. Slamka
    • 1
  • L. Pataki
    • 1
  • L. Ramacsay
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute of Physical CultureComenius UniversityBratislavaCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations