Advertisement

Birthweight, Gestational Age and Neonatal Morbidity in Four Italian Centres

  • A. De Scrilli
  • A. Bossi
  • M. L. Caccamo
Chapter

Abstract

Since their first publication, centiles of birthweight for length of gestation have been presented as a helpful device in the identifi-fication of newborn infants at high risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality (Lubchenco et al., 1963, Lubchenco, 1976). On the other hand, the value of the concept of ‘light for dates’ infants has been debated both for immediate clinical purposes and for epidemiological investigations (Thomson and Billewicz, 1976, Neligan, 1976). Particulary, as far as neonatal and perinatal mortality are concerned, it has been shown the common use of centiles of birthweight for gestation is inadequate, leading to the classification of many ‘low risk’ babies as ‘high risk’ and vice versa (Goldstein and Peckam, 1976, Hellier and Goldstein, 1979).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bassi, A., Caccamo, M.L., De Scrilli, A, e Milani, S., 1980, Stan-dazd del peso del neonata Italiano (dalla 32a alla 43a settimana di gestazione), Riv. Ital. Ped., 6: 153Google Scholar
  2. Candiani, G.B-, Fara, G.M., Marini, A., Marubioi, E., Pardi, G., Principi, N., e Sereni, F., 1975, Presentazione di una ricerca pluricentrica nel campo della medicina preventiva perinatale, Aooali Ostet. Ginec., 96: 295.Google Scholar
  3. De Scrilli, A., Bossi, A., Caccamo, M.L., e Marubini, E., 1982, Neonatal morbidity risk: a study of the-relationship to birthweight and gestational age in four Italian centres, Ann. Hum. Biol. ( Submitted).Google Scholar
  4. Goldstein, H., and Peckam, C., 1976, Birthweight, geatatiou,ueooatal mortality and child development, in: ‘The Biology of Human Fetal Growth’, D.F. Roberts and A.M. Thomson, ed., Taylor and Francis Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  5. Hellier, J.L., and Goldstein, H., 1979, The use of birthweight and gestation to assess perinatal mortality risk, J. Epidem. Comm. Hlth., 33: 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lubchenco, L.O., Hansman, C., Dressler, M., and Boyd, E., 1963, Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birthweight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation, Pediatrics, 32: 793.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lubchenco, L.O., 1976, ‘The high risk infant’, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London, Toronto.Google Scholar
  8. Neligan, G., 1976, Birthweight and intrauterine growth: some practical considerations, in: ‘The Biology of Human Fetal Growth’, D.F. Roberts and A.M. Thomson, ed., Taylor and Francis Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  9. Thomson, A.M., Billewicz, W.Z., 1976, The concept of ‘light for dates’ infants, in: ‘The Biology of Human Fetal Growth’, D.F. Roberts and A.M. Thomson, ed., Taylor and Francis Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  10. Wulff, H.R., 1976, ‘Rational diagnosis and treatment’ Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Melbourne.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. De Scrilli
    • 1
  • A. Bossi
    • 1
  • M. L. Caccamo
    • 2
  1. 1.Istituto di Statistica Medica e BiometriaUniversità degli Studi di MilanoItaly
  2. 2.Cattedra di Patologia NeonataleUniversità degli Studi di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations