Coherence and Quantum Optics IV pp 975-987 | Cite as

# Quadratic Nonlinearities and Turbulence in a Laser System

Conference paper

## Abstract

As is well known, the cubic nonlinearity in a many mode laser system is responsible for mode competition and for the concentration of the emitted power into one or a few excited modes. On the other hand, wide classes of nonlinear, nonequilibrium systems are known where the existence of nonlinearities with different symmetry (e.g., the Navier-Stokes nonlinearity in a driven fluid) gives rise to the spread of the energy initially fed into one mode over a wide spectrum of excited modes. These phenomena go under the general name of turbulence. When they occur in a driven fluid, the nonlinearity is the Navier-Stokes nonlinearity V·∇V where V is the velocity field. By Fourier-transforming this nonlinearity V·∇V within a finite volume, a mode-mode coupling as Σ,
to be added in the dynamic equation for the K mode amplitude A

_{K′}K′ V_{K-K′}V_{K′}arises which is quadratic in the mode amplitudes V_{K}. An example of amplitude equations with a cubic as well as a quadratic non-linearity is given in the Fourier expansion of the Benard instability. Here, the quadratic interaction takes the form[1]$$ - \delta \sum\limits_{{{\text{K}}_1},{{\text{K}}_2}} {{\text{A}}_{{{\text{K}}_1}}^ * {\text{A}}_{{{\text{K}}_2}}^ * {\delta _{{{\text{K}}_1} + {{\text{K}}_2} + {\text{K}},0}}}$$

(1.1)

_{K}. Notice that hydrodynamics allows for a very wide excitation spectrum (indeed, energy conservation implies ω_{K′}+ ω_{K″}= ω_{K}) as well as for three-dimensional structures, so that the momentum closure condition implied by the δ-function in Eq.(1.1) gives rise to the well-known hexagonal structures of the Benard instability.## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.a) L. Landau and E. Lifshitz,
*Fluid Mechanics*( Pergamon Press, London, 1959 );Google Scholar - b) R. Graham, Phys. Rev. Lett.
*31*, 479 (1973);ADSGoogle Scholar - c) H. Haken, Rev. Mod. Phys.
*47*, 67 (1975);ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - d) see e.g. papers by H. Haken and P.C. Martin delivered at the Conference on Statistical Physics, Budapest, 25–29 August, 1975.Google Scholar
- 2.W.E. Lamb, Jr., Phys. Rev.
*134*, A1429 (1964);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - see also M. Sargent, III, M.O. Scully and W.E. Lamb,
*Laser Physics*( Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1974 ).Google Scholar - 3.The introduction of a Hamiltonian and the derivation of a dynamic equation as (1.4) from it, is a purely formal device introduced for the sake of clarifying the terminology. The photon rate equations written later are a combination of the semiclassical laser equations, plus second-order terms evaluated by a perturbative approach.Google Scholar
- 4.J.E. Geusic et al., Appl. Phys. Lett.
*12*, 306 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.Any slight deviation from a flat gain line is sufficient to break the symmetry, thus giving rise to the privileged mode.Google Scholar
- 6.F.T. Arecchi, A.M. Ricca, to be published.Google Scholar
- 7.F.T. Arecchi and E. Schulz-Dubois,
*Laser Handbook*( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1972 ).Google Scholar - 8.See for instance, A. Yariv,
*Quantum Electronics*, 2nd ed. ( Wiley, New York, 1975 ) p. 430.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978