Advertisement

Electrodynamics Today

  • E. T. Jaynes
Conference paper

Abstract

In 1966, QED was in one of its recurrent states of pessimism, just as it had been twenty years earlier. In 1946, the teacher from whom I first learned about it — J. R. Oppenheimer — described it publicly as “a monumental flop.” But starting just at that time, the work of Tomonaga, Schwinger, Feynman, Dyson and others quickly restored the patient to vigorous health. These developments were pretty well consolidated by 1953 with the successful treatment of the Lamb shift and the anomalous moment, and optimism again ran high, with the belief that QED had been vindicated and could now advance to many new applications and elegant formulations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, as quoted by W. Pauli, Aufsätze und Vortrâge über Physik und Erkenntnistheorie, Fr. Vieweg u. Sohn, Braunschweig (1961), p. 88.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. P. Wigner, Symmetries and Reflections, Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington (1967), p. 46.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Schwinger, Stanford Lectures on Quantum Field Theory, Stanford Research Institute (1957); also Quantum Electrodynamics, Dover Publications, Inc. N. Y. (1958), p. xv.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. P. Feynman, in The Quantum Theory of Fields, Interscience Pub., Inc. N. Y. (1961).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. F. Weisskopf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 305 (1949); see also Physics in the Twentieth Century, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1972), pp. 97–111 and 120–129.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. S. Wightman, “Introduction to Some Aspects of the Relativistic Dynamics of Quantized Fields,” French Summer School of Theoretical Physics, Cargése, Corsica (July, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Lectures on Quantum Field Theory, Belfer Graduate School of Science, Yeshiva Univ., New York (1966).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A114, 243 (1927).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 74, 1439 (1948); 75, 651 (1949).ADSCrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. J. Dyson, Scientific American (April, 1953 ).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. A. Welton, Phys. Rev. 74, 1157 (1948).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. A. Power, Am. Jour. Phys. 34, 516 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 72, 339 (1947).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. T. Jaynes, in Coherence and Quantum Optics, L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Editors, Plenum Press, New York (1973) p. 35–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Hertz, Die Prinzipien der Mechanik, Leipzig (1894).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feature article in Physics Today (Aug., 1965), p. 41.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. L. MacAdam, J.O.S.A. 56, 1148 (1966). Following the present paper, Professor Lamb awarded the prize to Franken. Had we realized that the numerical magnitude in NCT would be considered all-important, and the qualitative nature of the phenomenon unimportant, a different outcome could easily have been arranged.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. D. Crisp, Phys. Rev. 179, 1253 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Mahanty, Il Nuovo Cimento 22B, No. 1, 110 (1974).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Citron, H. Gray, C. Gabel, and C. Stroud, “Experimental Study of Power Broadening in a Two-Level Atom,” Phys. Rev. (to be published).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical Resonance and Two-Level Atoms, J. Wiley 4 Sons, New York (1975), Chap. 7.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. W. Series, in Optical Pumping and Atomic Line Shape, T. Skalinski, Ed., Panst. Wdaw. Nauk Warsawa (1969); and “Radiative Damping and Level Shifts without Field Quantization,” (unpublished, 1975 ).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    I. R. Senitzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 954 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    P.W. Milonni, J.R. Ackerhalt and W.A. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 958 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. M. Fain and Ya. I. Khanin, in Quantum Electronics, MIT Press (1969).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. K. Bullough, et al., J. Phys. A7, 1647 (1974); 8, 759 (1975): J. Phys. B8, L147 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. T. Jaynes
    • 1
  1. 1.Washington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations