Advertisement

Interaction of Positronium Atoms with Coherent Radiation

  • F. H. M. Faisal
  • P. S. Ray
Conference paper

Abstract

Ps is a purely leptonic atom and plays an important role in testing the predictions of QED1. Recently it has also been suggested2,3 that Ps could decay by emitting axions whose existence has been conjectured4–8 for removing CP violations of gauge theories. In this connection the decay of the 3S1 ground state as well as the 3P1 state are of interest2,3. Ps atom is interesting for still other reasons such as the possibility of influencing the Mev γ-photons generated by self-annihilation of Ps — by resonant coupling with laser photons. Recent development of the accuracy of measurements9–11 of the fundamental hyperfine separation of the ground state Ps, also necessitates re-evaluation of the classic microwave absorption spectrum for this system. In this paper we consider the following problems in the above context:
  1. (i)

    Transient excitation of the ground state Ps to the first excited P-states and the exotic decay probability.

     
  2. (ii)

    Modification of the γ=annihilation probability of Ps by resonant laser interaction.

     
  3. (iii)

    Accurate redetermination of the microwave absorption line shape function for analysis of hyperfine separation in Ps.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A.Rich, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53 (1981) 127.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K.O.Mikaelian, Phys.Lett 77B (1978) 214; 105B (1981) 489 and W.Bernreuther and 0.Nachtmann,preprint HD-THEP-81–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.Cleymans,F.H.M.Faisal and P.S.Ray, Phys.Lett. 116B (1982) 447.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.D.Peccei, preprint MPI-PAE/PTh 37/81, 45/81.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.D.Peccei and H.Quinn, Phys.Rev.Lett. 38 (1977) 1440; Phys.Rev. D16 (1977) 1791.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.Weinberg, Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 223.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F.Wilczek, Phys.Rev.Lett. 40 (1978) 279.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.’t Hooft, Phys.Rev.Lett. 37 (1976) 8.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.P.Mills Jr., and G.H.Bearman, Phys.Rev.Lett. 34 (1975) 246.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.Carlson,V.W.Hughes and I.Lindgren, Phys.Rev. A15 (1977) 241.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Egan,V.W.Hughes and M.H.Yam, Phys.Rev. A15 (1977) 251.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.Rich, Phys.Rev. A23, (1981) 2747.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.P.Mills Jr., Phys.Rev. A27 (1983) 262.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.D.Theriot Jr.,R.H.Beers, V.W.Hughes and 0.H.Ziock, Phys.Rev. A2 (1970) 707.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K.F.Canter, A.P.Mills Jr. and S.Berko, Phys.Rev.Lett.33(1975)7.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F.H.M.Faisal and P.S.Ray, J.Phys.B:At.Mol.Phys. 14 (1981) L715.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. M. Faisal
    • 1
  • P. S. Ray
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität BielefeldBielefeldFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations