A Managerial Problem Solving Methodology (MPSM)
A managerial problem solving methodology (MPSM) has been developed and extensively used [1–7] to solve Process problems. A Process is defined as an operational combination of man-machine systems which transforms basic (to the organization) inputs ($’s) to primary (to survival) outputs (products/services). A problem is defined by state-space constraints  which threaten Process survival. A threat to survival is said to exist when the distance  between actual-performance and ideal-performance exceeds a given threshold.
KeywordsManagerial Problem Goal State Constraint Identification Operational Combination Equipment Provision
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.S. Chakraborty, “Problem Solving for the Central Office Equipment Provisioning Process,” Project Report #ASE1. NBTel, 1974.Google Scholar
- 2.S. Chakraborty, “Problem Solving for the Maintenance Process,” Project Report #ASE2. NBTel, 1975.Google Scholar
- 3.S. Chakraborty, “Problem Solving for the Switched Network Analysis Centre Interface System and Text Board System,” CSE Project Guidelines. NBTel, 1976.Google Scholar
- 4.S. Chakraborty, “Problem Solving for the Station Equipment Provisioning System,” SEPS Feasibility and Implementation Report. NBTel, 1976.Google Scholar
- 5.S. Chakraborty, “Management Performance—the Acid Tests,” Position Paper #MRE. NBTel, 1976.Google Scholar
- 6.S. Chakraborty, “Considerations and Notes on Proposed Organization Change,” Organization Change Project Report. NBTel, 1977.Google Scholar
- 7.S. Chakraborty, “Adaptive Organizations—Hybrid Structures,” Research Paper #100475–2. Centre for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Mass., 1975.Google Scholar
- 9.P. G. Jollymore, “Memo—Engineering Technical Committee,” TCTS Memo. NBTel, 1974.Google Scholar
- 10.G. J. Klir, An Approach to General Systems Theory. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
- 13.R. Rosen, “Complexity and Error in Social Dynamics,” International Journal of General Systems, Vol. 2, pp. 145–148, 1975.Google Scholar