Advertisement

The First Year of Mark J: Physics with High Energy Electron-Positron Colliding Beams

  • S. C. C. Ting

Abstract

These lectures review the experimental program of the MARK J collaboration using PETRA at DESY in Hamburg, West Germany. PETRA is the world’s highest energy electron-positron colliding beam storage ring nov in operation. There have been four groups (JADE, MARK J, PLUTO and TASSO) using PETRA since 1979. Their results are supportive and complementary to each other.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    PETRA Proposal (updated version), DESY, Hamburg, ( February, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Voss, The 19 GeV Storage Ring, Internal Report, DESY M/79/16.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.W. Herb, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 39, 252 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.W. Darden, et al., Phys. Lett., 76B, 246 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. Ch. Berger, et al., Phys. Lett., 76B, 243 (1978).Google Scholar
  6. J.K. Bienlein, et al., Phys. Lett., 78B, 360 (1978).Google Scholar
  7. C.W. Darden, et al., Phys. Lett., 78B, 364 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    A. Febei and G. Hemmie, PIA, the Positron Intensity Accumulator for the PETRA Injection, Internal Report, DESY M/79/13.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    U. Becker, et al., A Simple Detector to Measure Reactions at High Energy1, Proposal to PETRA Research Committee, ( March, 1976 ).Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    D.J. Gross and F.A. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett., 30, 1343 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. H.D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 30., 1346 (1973).Google Scholar
  12. J. Ellis, et al., Nucl. Phys., Bill, 253 (1976).Google Scholar
  13. T,. de Grand et al., Phys. Lett., Dl6, 3251 (1977).Google Scholar
  14. G. Kramer, et al., Phys. Lett., 79B, 249 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. A. De Rujula, et al., Nucl. Phys., B138, 387 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Hoyer, et al., DESY Preprint 79/21 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  17. A. Ali et al., Phys. Lett., 82B 285 (1979).Google Scholar
  18. 8.
    P. D.Luckey, et al., Proceedings of the International Symposium on Electron and Photon Interactions at High Energies, Hamburg 1965 (Springer, Berlin 1965) Vol. II, p. 397-Google Scholar
  19. 9.
    J.F.Crawford, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 127, 173 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 10.
    U. Becker, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 128, 593 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 11.
    H. Newman, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on High Energy Physics, Tokyo, Japan (August 1978), International Printing Co. Ltd., Japan.Google Scholar
  22. 12.
    A. Ali, E.Pietarinen, G. Kramer and J. Willrodt, DESY Report 79 /86, (1979).Google Scholar
  23. 13.
    R.D.Field and R.P.Feynman, Nucl. Phys., B136, 1 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 14.
    M.Kobayashi and T.Maskawa, Progr. Theor. Phys., 49, 652 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 15.
    A. Ali, et al., Heavy Quarks in Annihilation, DESY Report 79 /63, (1979).Google Scholar
  26. 16.
    F.A. Berends et al., Phys. Lett., 63B, 432 (1976).Google Scholar
  27. G. Bonneau and F. Martin, Nucl. Phys., B27, 381 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Y.S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys., 46, 815 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. L.W. Mo and Y.S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys., 41, 205 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 17.
    J.A.M. Vermaseren, CERN, (to be published). We wish to thank Dr.Vermaseren for helpful assistance.Google Scholar
  31. 18.
    H.G. Sanders, Diplomarbeit, Physikalisches Institut, Aachen, Report No.HEP 74/07 (1974)(unpublished).Google Scholar
  32. 19.
    T.A. Gabriel and R.L. Bishop, Nucl. Instr. Methods, 155., 8l (1978)Google Scholar
  33. 20.
    F.A. Berends, et al., Nucl. PHys., B68, 541 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 21.
    R.L. Ford and W.R. Nelson, SLAC Report-210, unpublished.Google Scholar
  35. 22.
    G.Ripken, Private communication. We would like to thank Dr.Ripken for his valuable assistance.Google Scholar
  36. 23.
    V. Alles-Borelli, et al., Nuovo Cimento, 7A, 345 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. H. Newman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 32, 483 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. J-E. Augustin, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 34, 233 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. L.H. Neill, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 37, 395 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 24.
    D.P. Barber, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 42, 1110 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 25.
    S.J. Brodsky and S.D. Drell, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci., 20, 147 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 26.
    S. Orito, et al., Phys. Lett., 48B, 165 (1974)Google Scholar
  43. 27.
    M. Perl, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 35, 1489 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. G. Feldman, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 38, 117 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 28.
    J. Burmester, et al., Phys. Lett., 68B, 297 (1977).Google Scholar
  46. J. Burmester, et al., Phys. Lett., 68B, 301 (1977).Google Scholar
  47. 29.
    For a review of our present knowledge of the T lepton, see Guenter Fluegge, Zeitsehr.f.Physik CI, Particles and Fields, 121 (1979), and the references therein.Google Scholar
  48. 30.
    R.Hofstadter, Proceedings of the 1975 International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies (Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, California, 1975 ) 869.Google Scholar
  49. 31.
    S.D. Drell, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 4, 75 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. T.D. Lee and G.C. Wick, Phys. Rev., D2, 1033 (1970).Google Scholar
  51. 32.
    D.P. Barber, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 43, 1915 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 33.
    H. Terazawa, Rev. Mod. Phys., 45, 615 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 34.
    Y.S. Tsai, Phys. Rev., D4, 2821 (1971).Google Scholar
  54. H.B. Thacker and J.J. Sakurai, Phys. Lett., 36B, 103 (1971).Google Scholar
  55. K. Fukijawa and N. Kawamoto, Phys. Rev., D14, 59 (1976).Google Scholar
  56. 35.
    J.L. Rosner, C. Quigg, H.B. Thacker, Phys. Lett., 74B, 350 (1978).Google Scholar
  57. M.Greco, Phys. Lett., 77B, 84 (1978).Google Scholar
  58. 36.
    T. Applequist and H. Georgi, Phys. Rev., D8, 40000 (1973).Google Scholar
  59. A. Zee, Phys. Rev., D8, 4038 (1973).Google Scholar
  60. 37.
    D.P. Barber, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 42, 1113 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. D.P. Barber, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 43, 901 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. D.P. Barber, et al., Phys. Lett., 85B, 463 (1979)Google Scholar
  63. E. Farhi, Phys. Rev. Lett., 39, 1587 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. S. Brandt, et al., Phys. Lett., 12, 57 (1964).Google Scholar
  65. S. Brandt and H. Dahmen, Zeitsehr. f. Phys., C1, 6l (1979).Google Scholar
  66. 38.
    G. Hansen, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 35., l609 (1975).Google Scholar
  67. 39.
    G.C. Fox and S. Wolfram, Phys. Rev. Lett., 41, 1581 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. G.C. Fox and S. Wolfram, Nucl. Phys., B413 (1979).Google Scholar
  69. G.C. Fox and F. Wolfram, Phys. Lett., 82B, 134 (1979).Google Scholar
  70. 40.
    D.P. Barber, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 43, 830 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 41.
    Ch. Berger, et al., Phys. Lett., 86B, 418 (1979)Google Scholar
  72. 42.
    Ch. Berger, et al., Phys. Lett., 76B, 176 (1978).Google Scholar
  73. S. Brandt and H. Dahmen, Zeitsehr. f. Phys., C1, 6l (1979).Google Scholar
  74. B. H.Wiik, Proc. Intern. Neutrino Conf. ( Bergen, Norway, June 1979 ).Google Scholar
  75. 43.
    H. Newman, paper presented at the 1979 Fermilab Conference (to be published in Proceedings). See Reference kO. See also S.Orito (the JADE Collaboration) ibid. Ch.Berger (the PLUTO Collaboration) ibid. G.Wolf (the TASSO Collaboration) ibid. For a summary of DESY work up to that time, see H.Schopper, DESY Report 79 /79 (1979).Google Scholar
  76. 44.
    P.Hoyer, et al., DESY Report 79/21 (1979).Google Scholar
  77. 45.
    D.P. Barber, et al., Phys. Lett., 89B, 139 (1979).Google Scholar
  78. 46.
    The data in Figures 44 and 45 at 0b or 0n is due to statistical fluctuations, and the energy resolution and possible higher order QCD effects.Google Scholar
  79. 47.
    In Figures 45–51 if we choose quark Pt 300 MeV we observeGoogle Scholar
  80. larger deviations between qq model and the data.Google Scholar
  81. A. DeRujula, et al., Nucl. Phys., B138, 387 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 49.
    H.L. Anderson, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 40, 106l (1978).Google Scholar
  83. P.C. Bosetti, et al., Nucl. Phys., B142, 1 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. J.G.H,. de Groot et al., Zeitschr f.Phys., C1, 143 (1979).Google Scholar
  85. J.G.H,. de Groot et al., Phys. Lett., 82B, 292 (1979).Google Scholar
  86. J.G.H,. de Groot et al., Phys. Lett., 82B, 456 (1979).Google Scholar
  87. 50.
    D. Antreasyan, et al., (to be published).Google Scholar
  88. 51.
    W. Bartel, et al., (the JADE Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 88B, 171 (1979).Google Scholar
  89. W. Bartel, et al., (the JADE Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 89B, 136 (1979).Google Scholar
  90. Ch. Berger, et al., (the PLUTO Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 8lB, 410 (1979).Google Scholar
  91. Ch.Berger, et al., (the PLUTO Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 86B, 413 (1979).Google Scholar
  92. Ch. Berger, et al., (the PLUTO Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 86B, 418 (1979).Google Scholar
  93. Ch. Berger, et al., (the PLUTO Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 89B, 120 (1979).Google Scholar
  94. R. Brandelik, et al., (the TASSO Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 83B, 261 (1979).Google Scholar
  95. R. Brandelik, et al., (the TASSO Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 86B, 243 (1979).Google Scholar
  96. R. Brandelik, et al., (the TASSO Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 88B, 199 (1979).Google Scholar
  97. R. Brandelik, et al., (the TASSO Collaboration), Phys. Lett., 89B, 4l8 (1980).Google Scholar
  98. 52.
    M. Krammer and H. Krasemann, DESY Report 78 /66 (1978).Google Scholar
  99. 53.
    It is not yet clear which q2 should be used to extract A to compare quantitatively with other data.Google Scholar
  100. 54.
    S. Orito (the JADE Collaboration), invited talk 1979 Symposium at FNAL and DESY Report T9/6U (1979).Google Scholar
  101. Ch. Berger et al., (the PLUTO Collaboration), DESY Report 80/01.Google Scholar
  102. 55.
    Ch. Berger, et al., (the PLUTO Collaboration), DESY Report 80/2.Google Scholar
  103. W. Bartel, et al., (the JADE Collaboration), DESY Report 80/84.Google Scholar
  104. 56.
    W. Bartel, et al., (the JADE Collaboration), DESY Report 79/80.Google Scholar
  105. Ch. Berger, et al., (the PLUTO Collaboration) DESY Report 79/83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. C. C. Ting
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Nuclear ScienceMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations