Advertisement

Evaluation of Time Course of Left Ventricular Isovolumic Relaxation in Humans

  • William E. Craig
  • Joseph P. Murgo
  • Ares Pasipoularides

Abstract

Weiss and coworkers [1] first determined, in an open-chest, right-heart-bypass animal model, that left-ventricular-pressure decay during isovolumic relaxation can be approximated by a monoexponential function. Their technique required that the derived or best-fit monoexponential curve for the pressure data decay asymptotically toward zero pressure. [1, 2]. Subsequent evaluation of the time course of pressure fall during isovolumic relaxation has questioned whether the monoexponential decay of isovolumic pressure decline should proceed to a zero or nonzero asymptote [3–5]. Inherent in this calculation is the assumption that pressure decline during isovolumic relaxation is mono-exponential. This postulate is empiric and is not necessarily predicated by any physiologic mechanism [6]. However, in those cases where a monoexponential model applies, calculation of the time constant provides a single index which characterizes the shape of the pressure curve during isovolumic relaxation. Such an index is important if the effects of relaxation on diastolic performance and overall cardiac function are to be evaluated in diseases such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

Keywords

Asymptote Model Coronary Artery Disease Group Semilog Plot Pressure Decline Monoexponential Decay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weiss JL, Frederiksen JW, Weisfeldt ML (1976). Hemodynamic determinants of the time course of fall in canine left ventricular pressure. J Clin Invest 58: 751–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frederiksen JW, Weiss JL, Weisfeldt ML (1978). Time constant of isovolumic pressure fall: Determinants in the working left ventricle. Am J Physiol 235: H701–706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craig WE, Murgo JP (1980). Evaluation of isovolumic relaxation in normal man during rest, exercise, and isoproterenol infusion. Circulation 62 (suppl II): II - 92 (abstract).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raff GL, Glantz SA (1981). Volume loading slows left ventricular isovolumic relaxation rate: Evidence of load dependent relaxation in the intact dog heart. Circ Res 48: 813–824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thompson DS, Waldron CB, Coltart DJ, et al (1983). Estimation of time constant of left ventricular relaxation. Br Heart J 49: 250–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pasipoularides A, Palacios I, Frist W, et al (1985). Contribution of activation-inactivation dynamics to the impairment of relaxation in hypoxic cat papillary muscle. Am J Physiol: Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 248: R54 - R62.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pasipoularides A, Murgo JP, Miller JW, Craig WE. Nonobstructive left ventricular ejection pressure gradients in man. (Submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sabbah HN, Stein PD (1986). Investigation of the theory and mechanism of the origin of the second heart sound. Circ Res 39: 874–882.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown DL, Craig WE, Layton SA, et al (1981). Exercise induced abnormalities of left ventricular relaxation in coronary artery disease. Circulation 64 (suppl IV): 28 (abstract).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murgo JP, Craig WE (1980). Relaxation abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathies. Circulation 62 (suppl II): 206 (abstract).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Craig WE, Pasipoularides A (1986). Ventricular diastolic dynamics: Effects of wall asynchrony on global relaxation indices. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation,Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murgo JP, Craig WE, Pasipoularides A (1982). The relationship between diastolic function and ejection in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In Proceedings of Symposium on Diastolic Function of the Heart,Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pagani M, Pizzinelli P, Gussoni M, et al (1983). Diastolic abnormalities of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy reproduced by asynchrony of the left ventricle in conscious dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 1: 641 (abstract).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thompson DS, Waldron CB, Juul SM, et al (1982). Analysis of left ventricular pressure during isovolumic relaxation in coronary artery disease. Circulation 65: 690–697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brutsaert DL, Housmans PR, Goethals MA (1980). Dual control of relaxation: Its role in the ventricular function in the mammalian heart. Circ Res 47: 637–652.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohn PF, Liedtke AJ, Serur J, et al (1972). Maximal rate of pressure fall (peak negative dp/dt) during ventricular relaxation. Cardiovasc Res 6: 263–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karliner JS, Lewinter MM, Mahler F, et al (1977). Pharmacologic and hemodynamic influences on the rate of isovolumic left ventricular relaxation in the normal conscious dog. J Clin Invest 60: 511–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thompson DS, Wilmshurst P, Juul SM, et al (1983). Pressure-derived indices of left ventricular isovolumic relaxation in patients with hypertrophie cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J 49: 259–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishing 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • William E. Craig
  • Joseph P. Murgo
  • Ares Pasipoularides

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations