Advertisement

Epidemiologic Approach to Cancer

  • Vincent F. Guinee
Chapter
Part of the Cancer, A Comprehensive Treatise book series (C)

Abstract

An agent (or agents) acts on a host to cause disease. All three of the elements of this interaction are only partially understood. Descriptions of these elements are limited by our science and indeed by our vocabulary. In the ideal model one agent acting on one host would cause one disease. In an attempt to approximate this model, we instead say this host will more often develop this disease if exposed to this agent than if not exposed. The agent or environment (i.e., many agents) may then be considered to be causally associated with this disease.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, J. H., Sacks, M. I., And Cahana, E., 1971, Death certificate data as an indication of the presence of certain common diseases at death, J. Chronic Dis. 24: 417–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderson, M., And Donnan, S., 1978, Hysterectomy rates and their influence upon mortality from carcinoma of the cervix, J. Epidemiol. Community Health 32: 175–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antunes, C. M. F., Stolley, P. D., Rosenshein, N. B., Davies, J. L., Tonascia, J. A., Brown, C., Burnett, L., Rutledge, A., Pokempner, M., And Garcia, R., 1979, Endometrial cancer and estrogen use: Report of a large case-control study, N. Engl. J. Med. 300: 9–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer, F. W., And Robbins, S. L., 1972, An autopsy study of cancer patients. I. Accuracy of the clinical diagnoses (1955 to 1965) Boston City Hospital, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 221: 1471–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Copeland, K. T., Checkoway, H., Mcmichael, A. J., And Holbrook, R. H., 1977, Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk, Am. J. Epidemiol. 105: 488–495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, E. B., Laszlo, J., And Freiman, A., 1979, Classification of cancer patients beyond Tnm, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 242: 2691–2695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Creech, J. L., JR., And Johnson, M. N., 1974, Angiosarcoma of liver in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride, J. Occup. Med. 16: 150–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutler, S. J., And Young, J. L., JR. (eds.), 1975, Third National Cancer Survey: Incidence Data, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 41. 150–161Google Scholar
  9. Doll, R., And Hill, A. B., 1950, Smoking and carcinoma of the lung: Preliminary report, Br. Med. J. 2: 739–748.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doll, R., And Hill, A. B., 1952, A study of the aetiology of carcinoma of the lung, Br. Med. J. 2: 1271–1286.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doll, R., And Hill, A. B., 1956, Lung cancer and other causes of death in relation to smoking: A second report on the mortality of British doctors, Br. Med. J. 2: 1071–1081.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doll, R., And Peto, R., 1976, Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years’ observations on male British doctors, Br. Med. J. 2: 1525–1536.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorn, H. F., 1959, Some problems arising in prospective and retrospective studies of the etiology“ of disease, N. Engl. J. Med. 261: 571–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn, J. E., JR., 1975, Cancer epidemiology in populations of the United States—with emphasis on Hawaii and California—and Japan, Cancer Res. 35: 3240–3245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Erhardt, C. L., 1958, What is “the cause of death”?, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 168: 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feinstein, A. R., 1968, Clinical epidemiology. Iii. The clinical design of statistics in therapy, Ann. Intern. Med. 69: 1287–1312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feinstein, A. R., And Spitz, H., 1969, The epidemiology of cancer therapy. I. Clinical problems of statistical surveys, Arch. Intern. Med. 123: 171–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haenszel, W., And Kurihara, M., 1968, Studies of Japanese migrants. I. Mortality from cancer and other diseases among Japanese in the United States, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 40: 43–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Haenszel, W., Kurihara, M., Segi, M., And Lee, R. K. C., 1972, Stomach cancer among Japanese in Hawaii, J Natl. Cancer Inst. 49: 969–988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Heath, C. W., JR., Falk, H., And Creech, J. L., JR., 1975, Characteristics of cases of angiosarcoma of the liver among vinyl chloride workers in the United States, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 246: 231–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horwitz, R. I., And Feinstein, A. R., 1978, Alternative analytic methods for case-control studies of estrogens and endometrial cancer, N. Engl. J. Med. 299: 1089–1094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibrahim, M. A. (ed.), 1979, The case-control study: Consensus and controversy, J. Chronic Dis. 32:1–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inman, W. H. W., 1979, Comment, J. Chronic Dis. 32: 89–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janerich, D. T., Glebatis, D., Flink, E., And Hoff, M. B., 1979, Case-control studies on the effect of sex steroids on women and their offspring, J. Chronic Dis. 32: 83–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liavag, I., Harbitz, T. B., And Haugen, O. A., 1972, Latent carcinoma of the prostate, Recent Results Cancer Res. 39: 131–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyon, J. L., And Gardner, J. W., 1977, The rising frequency of hysterectomy: Its effect on uterine cancer rates, Am. J. EpidemioL 105: 439–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mack, T. M., Pike, M. C., Henderson, B. E., Pfeffer, R. I., Gerkins, V. R., Arthur, M., And Brown, S. E., 1976, Estrogens and endometrial cancer in a retirement community, N. Engl. J. Med 294: 1262–1267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mcmichael, A. J., 1976, Standardized mortality ratios and the “healthy worker effect”: Scratching beneath the surface, J. Occup. Med. 18: 165–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mantel, N., And Haenszel, W., 1959, Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 22: 719–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Penner, D. W., 1973, Quality control and quality evaluation in histopathology and cytology, Pathol. Annu. 8: 1–19.Google Scholar
  31. Percy, C., And Dolman, A., 1978, Comparison of the coding of death certificates related to cancer in seven countries, Public Health Rep. 93: 335–350.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sackett, D. L., 1979, Bias in analytic research, J. Chronic Dis. 32: 51–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sartwell, P. E., 1974, Retrospective studies: A review for the clinician, Ann. Intern. Med. 81:381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shapiro, S., 1979, Discussion, J. Chronic Dis. 32: 47.Google Scholar
  35. Sissons, H. A., 1975, Agreement and disagreement between pathologists in histological diagnosis, Postgrad. Med. J. 51: 685–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, D. C., Prentice, R., Thompson, D. J., And Herrmann, W. L., 1975, Association of exogenous estrogen and endometrial carcinoma, N. Engl. J. Med. 293: 1164–1167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stemmermann, G. N., 1977, Gastric cancer in the Hawaii Japanese, Gann 68: 525–535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Taeuber, C., 1978, Census, in: International Encyclopedia of Statistics ( W. H. Kruskal and J. M. Tanur, eds.), pp. 41–46, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Vessey, M. P., 1979, Discussion, J. Chronic Dis. 32: 46.Google Scholar
  40. Walker, A. M., And Jick, H., 1979, Temporal and regional variation in hysterectomy rates in the United States, 1970–1975, Am. J. Epidemiol. 110: 41–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Walter, S. D., 1977, Determination of significant relative risks and optimal sampling procedures in prospective and retrospective comparative studies of various sizes, Am. J. Epidemiol. 105: 387–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Waterhouse, J., Muir, C., Correa, P., And Powell, J., (eds.), 1976, Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Iarc Scientific Publication 15, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
  43. Weiss, N. S., Szekely, D. R., English, D. R., And Schweid, A. I., 1979, Endometrial cancer in relation to patterns of menopausal estrogen use, J. Am. Med Assoc. 242: 261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White, K. L., Williams, T. F., And Greenberg, B. G., 1961, The ecology of medical care, N. Engl. J. Med. 265: 885–892.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Young, J. L., JR., Asire, A. J., And Pollack, E. S. (eds.), 1978, Seer Program: Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States 1973–1976, Dhew Publication No. (Nih) 78–1837, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  46. Zelnik, M., 1964, Errors in the 1960 census enumeration of native whites, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 59: 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ziel, H. K., And Finkle, W. D., 1975, Increased risk of endometrial carcinoma among users of conjugated estrogens, N. Engl. J. Med. 293: 1167–1170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selected General References

  1. Clarke, E. A., And Anderson, T. W., 1979, Does screening by “Pap” smears help prevent cervical cancer? A case-control study, Lancet 2: 1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Guzick, D. S., 1978, Efficacy of screening for cervical cancer: A review, Am. J. Public Health 68: 125–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Johannesson, G., Geirsson, G., And Day, N., 1978, The effect of mass screening in Iceland, 1965–74, on the incidence and mortality of cervical carcinoma, Int. J. Cancer 21: 418–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Miller, A. B., Lindsay, J., And Hill, G. B., 1976, Mortality from cancer of the uterus in Canada and its relationship to screening for cancer of the cervix, Int. J. Cancer 17: 602–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailar, J. C., Iii, 1976, Mammography: A contrary view, Ann. Intern. Med. 84: 77–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Shapiro, S., 1977, Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial, Cancer 39: 2772–2782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Snyder, R. E., 1980, Mammography in 1980: An historical perspective and present state of the art, Clin. Bull. 10: 3–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedman, G. D., Dales, L. G., And Ury, H. K., 1979, Mortality in middle-aged smokers and nonsmokers, N. Engl. J. Med. 300: 213–217.Google Scholar
  9. Hammond, E. C., And Horn, D., 1958, Smoking and death rates—Report on forty-four months of follow-up of 187,783 men. II. Death rates by cause, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 166: 1294–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rogot, E., And Murray, J. L., 1980, Smoking and causes of death among U.S. veterans: 16 years of observation, Public Health Rep. 95: 213–222.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wynder, E. L., And Graham, E. A., 1950, Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma: A study of six hundred and eighty-four proved cases, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 143: 329–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Court Brown, W. M., And Doll, R., 1965, Mortality from cancer and other causes after radiotherapy for ankylosing spondylitis, Br. Med. J. 2: 1327–1332.Google Scholar
  13. Martland, H. S., 1929, Occupational poisoning in manufacture of luminous watch dials: General review of hazard caused by ingestion of luminous paint, with especial reference to the New Jersey cases, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 92: 466–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martland, H. S., 1931, The occurrence of malignancy in radioactive persons: A general review of data gathered in the study of the radium dial painters, with special reference to the occurrence of osteogenic sarcoma and the inter-relationship of certain blood diseases, Am. J. Cancer 15:2435–2516.Google Scholar
  15. Refetoff, S., Harrison, J., Karanfilski, B. T., Kaplan, E. L., DE Groot, L. J., And Bekerman, C., 1975, Continuing occurrence of thyroid carcinoma after irradiation to the neck in infancy and childhood, N. Engl. J. Med. 292: 171–175.Google Scholar
  16. Sharpe, W. D., 1978, The New Jersey radium dial painters: An occupational carcinogenesis, Bull. Hist. Med. 52: 560–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Socolow, E. L., Hashizume, A., Neriishi, S., And Niitani, R., 1963, Thyroid carcinoma in man after exposure to ionizing radiation: A summary of the findings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, N. Engl. J. Med. 268: 406–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wright, E. S., And Couves, C. M., 1977, Radiation-induced carcinoma of the lung—The St. Lawrence tragedy, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 74: 495–498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Baumgarten, M., And Oseasohn, R., 1980, Studies on occupational health: A critique, J. Occup. Med. 22: 171–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Enterline, P. E., 1964, The estimation of expected rates in occupational disease epidemiology, Public Health Rep. 79: 973–978.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marsh, G. M., And Enterline, P. E., 1979, A method for verifying the completeness of cohorts used in occupational mortality studies, J. Occup. Med. 21: 665–670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Olsen, J., And Sabroe, S., 1979, Researching occupational mortality: The problem of comparison, Scand. J. Soc. Med. 7: 1–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fraumeni, J. F., JR. (ed.), 1975, Persons at High Risk of Cancer: An Approach to Cancer Etiology and Control, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Lilienfeld, A. M., Pedersen, E., And Dowd, J. E., 1967, Cancer Epidemiology: Methods of Study, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  25. Lilienfeld, A. M., Levin, M. L., And Kessler, I. I., 1972, Cancer in the United States, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  26. Maclennan, R., Muir, C., Steinitz, R., And Winkler, A., 1978, Cancer Registration and Its Techniques, Iarc Scientific Publication 21, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
  27. Macmahon, B., Pugh, T. F. And Ipsen, J., 1960, Epidemiologic Methods, Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  28. Mason, T. J., Mckay, F. W., Hoover, R., Blot, W. J., And Fraumeni, J. F., JR., 1976, Atlas of Cancer Mortality for U.S. Counties: 1950–1969, Dhew Publication No. (NI H) 75–780, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent F. Guinee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EpidemiologyThe University of Texas System Cancer Center, M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor InstituteHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations