Advertisement

A Quantitative Analysis on the Opinions of Different Stakeholder Groups in Turkish e-Government Transformation

  • Gökhan İskenderEmail author
  • Sevgi Özkan Yıldırım
Chapter
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 5)

Abstract

This study focuses on the opinions of external and internal stakeholders on the probable success factors that are assumed to be effective on the e-Government transformation success in Turkey. It uses a generic methodology previously developed by the same researchers to collect data from four central and four local Turkish public institutions and applies correlation analyses on the collected data to present its results. Apart from the similar studies in the literature, this study is a multidimensional quantitative one considering the technical, social, organizational, political, legal, and economic dimensions of the subject concurrently, and it uses the data of not only external stakeholders (the set of all stakeholders who only use the e-Government services provided by a public institution) but also internal stakeholders (the set of all stakeholders who only provide the e-Government services in a public institution) while doing its analyses to create an opportunity for the researchers to clearly compare and contrast the perspectives of these two different groups.

Keywords

Stakeholder Group Correlate Factor Public Institution Success Factor Management Support 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Al-Azri A, Al-Salti Z, Al-Karaghouli W (2010) The successful implementation of e-government transformation: a case study in Oman. In: Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean & middle eastern conference on information systems, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  2. Carbo T, Williams JG (2004) Models and metrics for evaluating local electronic government systems and services. Electron J e-Gov 2(2):95–104Google Scholar
  3. Chutimaskul W, Chongsuphajaisiddhi V (2004) A framework for developing local e-government. In: Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3035. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 335–340Google Scholar
  4. DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):9–30Google Scholar
  5. Evangelidis A (2005) FRAMES—a risk assessment framework for e-services. Electron J e-Gov 2(1):21–30Google Scholar
  6. Ferro E, Helbig NC, Gil-García JR (2011) The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. Gov Inf Q 28(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gagnon Y-C (2001) The behavior of public managers in adopting new technologies. Public Perform Manag Rev 24(4):337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Khosrow-Pour M (ed) (2005) Practicing e-government: a global perspective. Idea Group, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  9. Klischewski R, Askar E (2012) Linking service development methods to interoperability governance: the case of Egypt. Gov Inf Q 29(Supplement 1):22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. In: Simon HA (ed). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Oxford Dictionaries: Definition of Transformation (2012) Retrieved April 16, 2012, from http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/transformation
  12. Pardo TA, Tayi GK (2007) Interorganizational information integration: a key enabler for digital government. Gov Inf Q 24(4):691–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reddick CG, Turner M (2012) Channel choice and public service delivery in Canada: comparing e-government to traditional service delivery. Gov Inf Q 29(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rehman M, Esichaikul V, Kamal M (2012) Factors influencing e-government adoption in Pakistan. Transform Gov People Process Policy 6(3):258–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reinwald A, Kraemmergaard P (2012) Managing stakeholders in transformational government—a case study in a Danish local government. Gov Inf Q 29(2):133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tat-Kei Ho A (2002) Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Adm Rev 62(4):434–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verdegem P, Verleye G (2009) User-centered e-government in practice: a comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Gov Inf Q 26(3):487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weerakkody V, Dhillon G (2008) Moving from e-Government to t-Government. Int J Electron Gov Res 4(4):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yang T-M, Maxwell TA (2011) Information-sharing in public organizations: a literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Gov Inf Q 28(2):164–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yun HJ, Opheim C (2010) Building on success: the diffusion of e-government in the American states. Electron J e-Gov 8(1):71–82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middle East Technical University, ODTÜ Enformatik EnstitüsüÇankaya AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Information and Communication Technologies Authority of Turkey (ICTA), Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu, Ankara Bölge MüdürlüğüAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Middle East Technical University (METU), ODTÜ Enformatik EnstitüsüÇankaya AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations