The Need for Analyzing e-Government Efficiency: An Introduction

  • Manuel Pedro Rodríguez-BolívarEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 5)


The question of e-Government has become one of the most important issues on political agendas today, and since the late 1990s, a number of countries have launched e-Government projects, with a particular emphasis on using ICT to provide electronic information and services to citizens and businesses. An analysis of literature review indicates that e-Government research has been focused on topics such as enhanced services, streamlined transactions, two-way communication, and greater transparency, but theoretical analysis and practical experiences regarding systems to measure impacts of e-Government implementation on the efficiency of public administrations remain without an appropriated answer nowadays. Therefore, there is a need for analyzing efficiency of e-Government implementations and for knowing the perception of main factors involved in e-Government projects regarding effects of e-Government projects into the efficiency of their work and decision-making processes.

This book, structured into three parts, seeks to contribute to the literature by filling the existing void and expanding knowledge in the field of efficiency of e-Government implementations for both public administrations and stakeholders. It provides understanding how e-Government efficiency could be measured and about the reasons why public managers and politicians are undertaking e-Government projects, as well as why stakeholders could be forcing public administrations in order to undertake e-Government projects.


Public Administration Public Manager Deliberative Democracy Information Transparency Public Sector Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bellamy C, Taylor J (1998) Governing in the information age. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  2. Caiden GE, Sundaram P (2004) The specificity of public service reform. Public Admin Dev 24(5):373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen YC, Gant J (2001) Transforming local e-Government services: the use of application service providers. Govern Inform Q 18(4):343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciborra C (2005) Interpreting e-Government and development efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? Inform Technol People 18(3):260–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coursey D, Norris DF (2008) Models of e-Government: are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Adm Rev 68(3):523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dada D (2006) The failure of e-Government in developing countries: a literature review. Electron J Inform Syst Dev Countries 26(7):1–10Google Scholar
  9. Dunleavy P, Margetts H, Bastow S, Tinkler J (2006) New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance. J Public Adm Res Theory 16:467–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edelenbos J, Klok P-J, Tatenhove JV (2009) The institutional embedding of interactive policy making. Am Rev Public Adm 39(2):125–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heeks R (1999) Reinventing government in the information age: international public sector reform. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heeks R (2002) e-Government in Africa: promise and practice. Inform Polity 7(2):97–114Google Scholar
  13. Heeks R, Bailur S (2007) Analysing e-Government research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Govern Inform Q 24(1):243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim S, Kim HJ, Lee H (2009) An institutional analysis of an e-Government system for anti-corruption: the case of OPEN. Govern Inform Q 26(1):42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landsbergen D Jr, Wolken G (2001) Realizing the promise: government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Adm Rev 61(2):206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martins MR (1995) Size of municipalities, efficiency, and citizens participation: a cross-European perspective. Environ Plann C Govern Pol 13(4):441–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Osborne D (2009) Delivering public services: are we asking the right questions? Public Money Manag 29(1):5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osborne D (2010) Delivering public services: time for a new theory? Public Manag Rev 12(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Piotrowski SJ, Van Ryzin GG (2007) Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. Am Rev Public Adm 37(3):306–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodríguez Bolívar MP, Caba Pérez C, López Hernández AM (2007) e-Government and public financial reporting. The case of Spanish regional governments. Am Rev Public Adm 37(2): 142–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodríguez Bolívar MP, Alcaide Muñoz L, López Hernández AM (2010) Trends of E-government research. Contextualization and research opportunities. Int J Digit Account Res 10:87–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shim DC, Eom TH (2009) Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital. Int Rev Admin Rev 75(1):99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sung N (2007) Information technology, efficiency and productivity: evidence from Korean local governments. Appl Econ 39(13–15):1691–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor J, Lips M, Organ J (2007) Information-intensive government and the layering and sorting of citizenship. Public Money Manage 27(2):161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson HG, Garbacz C (2007) Mobile, fixed line and Internet service effects on global productive efficiency. Inform Econ Policy 19(2):189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2001) Making new technologies work for human development. Human development report. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Yildiz M (2007) e-Government research: reviewing the literature, limitations and ways forward. Govern Inform Q 24(3):646–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting and FinanceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations