The Impacts of Social Media on Government and Democracy: An Examination of Municipal Usage in Nova Scotia, Canada

  • Karan RiarhEmail author
  • Jeffrey Roy
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 4)


Web 2.0 and social media is purported to be a driver of citizen engagement and participative capacities. However, there are tensions between these open networked technologies, and traditional democratic and administrative governance systems. These tensions create a set of tensions between communications and engagement stemming from the deployment of Web 2.0 and social media technologies. This chapter examines social media trends and usage at the local level in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia. Studying both administrative and electoral usage in the autumn of 2012, we found that social media platforms are still new for municipalities and local politicians in the province with only half of municipalities and half of the politicians in the two major urban centers using social media. Moreover, they used social media primarily as a means toward one-way information sharing and communicating. As Web 2.0 technologies continue to proliferate, and as governments continue to experiment, a more open, outward and interactive public sector, both administratively and democratically, is needed in order to foster capacities for genuine engagement.


Government Social media Technology Internet Elections Engagement Communications 


  1. Association of Local Government Information Management Inc. (2009). A Roadmap to E-democracy in New Zealand local government. ALGIM E-Democracy Research Paper:
  2. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke, A. (2010). Social Media: 4. Political uses and implications for representative democracy. Library of Parliament.
  4. Embaye, H., Navratil, P., Ng, D., & Yang, S. (n.d.). Social Media Primer for Municipal Governments.
  5. Fyfe, T., & Crookall, P. (2010). Social Media and Public Sector Policy Dilemmas. Toronto: Institute of Public Administration of Canada: Toronto.
  6. Good Neighbours, Great Neighbourhoods. (n.d). In Facebook [Fan Page]. Accessed 2 March 2013.
  7. Halifax Regional Municipality. (n.d). Social media.
  8. Hand, L., & Ching, B. (2011). “You have one friend request”: An exploration of power and citizen engagement in local governments’ use of social media. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(3), 362–382. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806330303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huijboom, N., van den Broek, T., Frissen, V., Kool, L., Kotterink, B., Nielsen, M., & Millard, J. (2009). Public Services 2.0: The Impact of Social Computing on Public Services. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
  10. International Association for Public Participation. (2007). IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation.
  11. Klang, M., & Nolin, J. (2011). Disciplining social media: An analysis of social media policies in 26 Swedish municipalities. First Monday, 16(8) pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. (2011). An open government implementation model: Moving to increased public engagement. IBM center for the business of government.
  13. Maier-Rabler, U., & Huber, S. (2011). “Open”: The changing relation between citizens, public administration, and political authority. eJournal of eDemocracy & Open Government, 3(2), 182–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morison, J. (2010). Gov 2.0: Towards a user generated state? The Modern Law Review, 73(4), 551–577. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00808.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mossberger, K., & Wu, Y. (2012). Civic engagement and local e-government: Social networking comes of age. Institute for Policy & Civic Engagement, University of Illinois at Chicago:
  16. Mota, J., & Santinha, G. (2012, July 16). Social media and civic engagement: Discussing the case of Aveiro, Portugal. European Journal of ePractice.
  17. OECD. (2009). Focus on citizens: Public engagement for better policy and services. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Roy, J. (2012, May 7). The rise of municipal government 2.0. Canadian Government Executive, 17(3).
  19. Roy, J. (2013). From machinery to mobility: Government and democracy in a participative age. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), S72–S81. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Serrat, O. (2010). Social media and the public sector. Knowledge solutions. International Publications, Cornell University ILR School: Ithaca, NY
  22. Tapscott, D., Williams, A., & Herman, D. (2008). Government 2.0: Transforming government and governance for the twenty-first century. nGenera Corporation.Google Scholar
  23. Thomas, R. (2012, February 3). Participatory budgeting in Canadian municipalities?.
  24. Transit Cooperative Research Program. (2012). TCRP synthesis 99: Uses of social media in public transportation.
  25. Weeks, W. (2012, December). Spotlight on Social Media. Municipal World, Union, Ontario:

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Administration, Faculty of ManagementDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations