Realizing Data Sharing: The Role of Spatial Data Infrastructures

  • Glenn VancauwenbergheEmail author
  • Ezra Dessers
  • Joep Crompvoets
  • Danny Vandenbroucke
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 4)


In the past years, various initiatives have been taken to promote and coordinate the sharing of spatial data from multiple sources. These initiatives are often referred to as a whole with the term “spatial data infrastructure” (SDI), which can be seen as the collection of technological and organizational components oriented towards facilitating and coordinating spatial data sharing. Coordination, which can be defined as the alignment of tasks and efforts of different actors, is seen to be one of the key aspects of an SDI. Although several authors have stressed the importance of coordination in the context of SDI development, little attention has been paid to the impact of coordination efforts on the process of sharing spatial data to different users. The objective of this chapter is to explore whether coordination in the context of SDI contributes to the degree of spatial data sharing. The chapter makes use of evidence collected in a comparative case study of four public sector processes in the region of Flanders (Belgium). The results of this case study show that spatial data sharing can be coordinated at the level of individual organizations, the process, and the entire infrastructure (or SDI). The chapter concludes that the noted differences in the degree of data sharing between the various processes could not only be related to different levels of coordination efforts at the process level, but also to the extent of integration of these processes in the larger infrastructure.


Spatial data Data sharing Coordination Spatial data infrastructure 


  1. Azad, B., & Wiggins, L. (1995). Dynamics of inter-organizational geographic data sharing: A conceptual framework for research. In H. Onsrud & G. Rushton (Eds.), Sharing geographic information (pp. 22–43). New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research.Google Scholar
  2. Budhathoki, N. R., Bruce, B. C., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2008). Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. Geo Journal, 72(3), 149–160.Google Scholar
  3. Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craglia, M. (2003). GI in the Wider Europe. GINIE consortium. Accessed 1 Oct 2007.
  5. Craglia, M., & Johnston, A. (2004). Assessing the impacts of spatial data infrastructures: Methods and gaps. Paper presented at the 7th AGILE conference on Geographic Information Science, Heraklion.Google Scholar
  6. Crompvoets, J., Bregt, A., Rajabifard, A., & Williamson, I. (2004). Assessing the worldwide developments of national spatial data clearing houses. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(7), 665–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crompvoets, J., Vancauwenberghe, G., Bouckaert, G., & Vandenbroucke, D. (2011). Practices to develop spatial data infrastructures as support to e-government. In S. Assar, I. Boughzala, & I. Boydens (Eds.), Practical Studies in e-Government (pp. 229–248). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawes, S. S. (1996). Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Management, 15(3), 377–394.Google Scholar
  9. Elwood, S. (2007). Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: Challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 22, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2010). Location: The Unifying Factor. Finnish National Spatial Data Strategy 2010–2015. Helsinki: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.Google Scholar
  11. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Chun, S. A., & Janssen, M. (2009). Government information sharing and integration: Combining the Social and the technical. Information Polity, 14, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Groot, R., & McLaughlin, J. (2000). Introduction. In R. Groot & J. McLaughlin (Eds.), GeoGeospatial data infrastructure: Concepts, cases, and good practice (pp. 1–12). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harvey, F., & Tulloch, D. (2006). Local-government data sharing: Evaluating the foundations of spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 743–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kok, B., & Van Loenen, B. (2005). How to assess the success of national spatial data infrastructures? Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. Environment and Urban Systems, 29(6), 699–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landsbergen, D., & Wolken, G. (2001). Realizing the promise: Government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Masser, I. (1999). All shapes and sizes: The first generation of national spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDougall, K. (2009). The potential of citizen volunteered spatial information for building SDI. Paper presented at the GSDI 11 World Conference: Spatial Data Infrastructure Convergence: Building SDI Bridges to Address Global Challenges, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  18. Nedovic-Budic, Z., & Pinto, J. K. (1999). Understanding interorganizational GIS activities: A conceptual framework. URISA Journal, 11(1), 53–64Google Scholar
  19. Nedovic-Budic, Z., Pinto, J. K., & Warnecke, L. (2004). GIS Database Development and Exchange: Interaction Mechanisms and Motivations. URISA Journal, 16(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  20. Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment. (2008). GIDGIDEON – Key geo-information facility for the Netherlands. Approach and implementation strategy (2008–2011). The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.Google Scholar
  21. Rajabifard, A., & Williamson, I. P. (2001). Spatial Data Infrastructures: An initiative to facilitate spatial data sharing. In R. Tateishi & D. Hastings (Eds.), Global environmental databases – Present situation and future directions (pp. 108–136). Hong Kong: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.Google Scholar
  22. Rajabifard, A., Feeney, M.-E. F., & Williamson, I. P. (2003). Spatial Data Infrastructures: Concept, nature and SDI hierarchy. In I. P. Williamson, A. Rajabifard, & M.-E. F. Feeney (Eds.), DevDeveloping Spatial Data Infrastructures. From concept to reality eloping Spatial Data Infrastructures. From concept to reality (pp. 17–40). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Tulloch, D. L., & Harvey, F. (2007). When data sharing becomes institutionalized: Best practices in local government geographic Information relationships. URISA Journal, 19(2), 51–59.Google Scholar
  24. UK Geographic Information Panel. (2008). Place matters: The Location Strategy for the United Kingdom. London: Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  25. Van Loenen, B. (2006). Developing geographic information infrastructures: The role of information policies. Delft: DUP Science.Google Scholar
  26. Vancauwenberghe, G. (2013). Coördinatie binnen de Geografische Data Infrastructuur. Een analyse van het gebruik en de uitwisseling van geografische gegevens in Vlaanderen. Leuven: KU Leuven.Google Scholar
  27. Vancauwenberghe, G., Crompvoets, J., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Interorganizational information sharing as a driver of change in public administration. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 3(2), 87–106.Google Scholar
  28. Wallace, J. (2007). Spatially enabling mortgage markets in Australia. In A. Rajabifard (Ed.), Towards a spatially enabled societyards a spatially enabled society (pp. 119–138). Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn Vancauwenberghe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ezra Dessers
    • 2
  • Joep Crompvoets
    • 3
  • Danny Vandenbroucke
    • 1
  1. 1.Spatial Applications Division Leuven (SADL)KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Centre for Sociological Research (CeSO)KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Public Management InstituteKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations