Advertisement

Complex Pilonidal Disease and Acute and Chronic Perineal Wounds: Point – Counterpoint

  • Herand Abcarian
  • Guy Robert OrangioEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter we will discuss the management of the posterior midline wound and the open perineal wound. These two wounds have plagued surgeons and patients for decades. The first discussion is on the controversial management of the post-pilonidal cystectomy wound: leave the wound to heal by secondary intention or primary closure with a fasciocutaneous flap (V–Y advancement flap). Healing by secondary intention does have a low complication rate and recurrence, but the management of the open wound is difficult and frustrating for the patient and sometimes for the colorectal surgeon. Since the 1960s the fasciocutaneous flaps have been utilized with what appears to be “minimal” morbidity and a “0–11.1 %” recurrence rate. The authors have a slight difference of opinion on the management of this complex problem. Then we will turn our attention to one of the most difficult wounds to manage: the open perineal wound, post-abdominoperineal resection for malignancy of the low rectum or anal canal and post-proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We will discuss the acute and chronic approach to this debilitating wound. The authors both agree that the reconstruction of the perineal floor is a multidisciplinary team approach: including the colon rectal surgeon, plastic reconstructive surgeon, wound ostomy team, and occasionally urology.

Keywords

Myocutaneous Flap Advancement Flap Perineal Wound Pilonidal Sinus Hidradenitis Suppurativa 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Video 24.1

Anoplasty (Video by Larry R. Sands, MD) (M4V 100338 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dwight RW, Maloy JK. Pilonidal sinus; experience with 449 cases. N Engl J Med. 1953;249(23):926–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayo OH. Observations on injuries and disease of rectum. London: Burgess and Hill; 1833. p. 45–6 (Quoted from da Silva JH. Pilonidal cyst: cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1146–56).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hodge RM. Pilonidal sinus. Boston Med Surg J. 1880;103:485–6 (Quoted from da Silva JH. Pilonidal cyst: cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1146–56).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet. 1973;2(7843):1414–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992;62(5):45–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Urhan MK, Kucukel F, Topgul K, Ozer I, Sari S. Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus: results of 102 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(5):656–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bascom J, Bascom T. Failed pilonidal surgery-new paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg. 2002;137:114650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vijay P, Khatri MD, Espinosa MD, Amin AK. Management of recurrent pilonidal sinus by simple V-Y fasciocutaneous flap. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:1232–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eryilmaz R, Okan I, Coskun A, Bas G, Sahim M. Surgical treatment of complicated pilonidal sinus with a fasciocutaneous V-Y advancement flap. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(12):2036–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fazeli MS, Adel MG, Lebaschi AH. Comparison of outcomes in Z-plasty and delayed healing by secondary intention of the wound after excision of sacral pilonidal sinus: results of a randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1831–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perez-Gurri JA, Temple WJ, Ketcham AS. Gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap for the treatment of recalcitrant pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;47:262–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kleckner MS. Pilonidal sinus: its surgical management. Trans Am Proctol Soc. 1936;36:166.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eftaiha M, Abcarian H. The dilemma of pilonidal disease: surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 1977;20(4):279–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gabriel WB. The principles and practice of rectal surgery. Springfield: Thomas; 1948.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenberg L. The dilemma of pilonidal disease: reverse bandaging for cure of reluctant pilonidal wound. Dis Colon Rectum. 1977;20(4):290–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bullard KM, Trudel JL, Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA. Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:438–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gazzaz GE, Kiran RP, Lavery I. Wound complications in rectal cancer patients undergoing primary closure of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1962–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Christian CK, Kwaan MR, Betensky RA, Breen EM, Zinner MJ, Bleday R. Risk factors for perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:43–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nilsson PJ, Svensson C, Goldman S, Glimelius B. Salvage abdominoperineal resection in anal epidermoid cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1425–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Papacontantinou H, Bullard K, Rotherenberger D, Madoff R. Salvage APR after failed Nigro protocol: modest success, major morbidity (meeting abstract). Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:A63.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Page CP, Carlton Jr PK, Beck DW. Closure of pelvic and perineal wounds after removal of the rectum and anus. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;23:2–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    De Broux E, Parc Y, Rondelli F, Dehni N, Tiret E, Parc R. Sutured perineal omentoplasty after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the lower rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:476–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Dombal FT, Burton I, Goligher JC. The early and late results of surgical treatment for Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg. 1971;58:805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC, Coller JA, Ross VH. Perineal wound healing after proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1978;21(3):155–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abcarian H, Eftaliha M. Management of the perineal wound after proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1978;21:287–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alpsan K, Singh A, Ahmad A. Clinical comparison of perineal wound management. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;23(8):564–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lubbers Evert JC. Healing of the perineal wound after proctectomy for nonmalignant conditions. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;25(4):351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oakley JR, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL, Easley K. Management of the perineal wound after rectal excision for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28(12):885–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turnbull RB, Fazio V. Advances in the surgical technique of ulcerative colitis surgery: endoanal proctectomy and two-directional myotomy ileostomy. Surg Annu. 1975;7:315–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lyttle JA, Parks AG. Intersphincteric excision of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1977;62:413–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schaffzin DM, Douglas JM, Stahl TJ, Smith LE. Vacuum-assisted closure of complex perineal wounds. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1745–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cresti S, Ouaissi M, Sielezneff I, Jean-Batiste C, Pirro N, Berthet B, Consentino B, Sastre B. Advantage of vacuum assisted closure on healing of wound associated with omentoplasty after abdominoperineal excision: a case report. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:136.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Colombel JF, Mathieu D, Bouault JM, Lesage X, Zavadil P, Quandalle P, Cortot A. Hyperbaric oxygenation in severe perineal Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:609–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chan S, Miller M, Ng R, Ross D, Roblin P, Carapeti E, Williams AB, George ML. Use of myocutaneous flaps for perineal closure following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for adenocarcinoma. Colorectal Dis. 2009;12:555–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hainsworth A, Al Akash M, Roblin P, Mohanna P, Ross D, George ML. Perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision using inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. Br J Surg. 2012;99:584–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Buchel EW, Finical S, Johnson C. Pelvic reconstruction using rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:22–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chessin DB, Hatley J, Cohen AM, et al. Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:14–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lefevre JH, Parc Y, Kemeis S, et al. Abdomino-perineal resection for anal cancer: impact of vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap on survival, recurrence, morbidity and wound healing. Ann Surg. 2009;250:707–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nelson RA, Butler CE. Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvis and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;183:175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scheuffler O, Farhadi J, Kovach SJ, et al. Anatomical basis and clinical application of infragluteal perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook CountyChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryLouisiana State University Health Science Center, LSU School of MedicineNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations