Developing a Strategy for Effective e-Government: Findings from Canada

  • Mary FrancoliEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 3)


Canada used to be known as a leader in the area of e-government and had an outstanding record for making government information and services available online. This changed with the emergence of web 2.0 technologies. Indeed, for a number of years, the federal government proved to be slow in embracing the interactive potential of new technologies to engage with citizens. However, its new open government strategy provides some evidence that things are changing. This chapter tracks the evolution of e-government in the Government of Canada. It questions what factors led to Canada’s declining record in the area of e-government and asks whether the government believes its relationship with citizens is changing and what efforts it has taken to embrace e-government 2.0. Using a case study approach that draws on a strategic management framework and models of e-government, the chapter concludes that Canada’s declining reputation can be attributed to the lack of an ongoing strategic plan, poor understanding about the capacity of technology, lack of understanding about the changing needs of citizens and a tumultuous political environment. Ultimately, the chapter shows the importance of having a strategic plan that is reflective of technological change and success in the area of e-government. The Canadian Open Government Action Plan indicates a desire for change and the outline of a strategy to be monitored in the coming years.


e-Government Social media Open government Web 2.0  e-Government 2.0 Strategic management Public sector management 


  1. Akerley, M. (2010). Government of Canada Web 2.0: Making a difference—making it happen. Retrieved May 18, 2012 from Scholar
  2. Alkhafaji, A. (2003). Strategic management: Formulation, implementation, and control in a dynamic environment. New York: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, R., Boyne, G., Law, J., & Walker, R. (2012). Strategic management and public service performance. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  4. Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: “E-government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions., 16(2), 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clement, T. (2012). Expanding Open Government in Canada. Public Sector Digest, Spring.Google Scholar
  6. Curry, B. (2010). Access to information risks being ‘obliterated’: report. Globe and Mail. April 13, 2010. Retrieved September 1, 2011 from
  7. Dobell, P. (2000). What could Canadians expect from a minority government? Policy Matters, 1(6), 11–12.Google Scholar
  8. Ethi. (2011). Standing committee on access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (Ethi). House of Commons, Canada. Retrieved January 3, 2012 from
  9. Francoli, M. (2011). What makes governments ‘open’? Journal of eDemocracy, 3(2), 152–165.Google Scholar
  10. Good, D. (2004). Minority governments and public servants. Canadian Parliamentary Review, AutumnGoogle Scholar
  11. Government of Canada. (2008). Government online. Retrieved May 19, 2012 from
  12. Government of Canada. (2010). The digital economy in Canada. Retrieved May 15, 2012 from
  13. Government of Canada. (2011). Speech from the Throne. Retrieved May 18, 2012 from
  14. Government of Canada. (2012). Canada’s action plan on open government. Retrieved May 1, 2012 from Scholar
  15. Jaeger, P. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pheonix Strategic Perspectives Inc. (2008). New Technologies and Government of Canada Communications, Report Prepared for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa. Retrieved May 16, 2012 at Scholar
  17. Roy, J. (2006). E-government in Canada: transformation for the digital age. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  18. UN. (2003). UN Global e-Government Survey 2003. Retrieved May 10, 2012 from
  19. UNPAN. UN E-Government Survey. Retrieved May 10, 2012 from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Journalism and CommunicationCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations