Creativity and Innovation Inside PSEO: A Contemporary Image

  • Konstantinos ZacharisEmail author
  • Pandelis G. Ipsilandis
  • James O’Kane
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 3)


Worldwide, management systems invest strongly on the concepts of innovation and creativity, two pillars necessary for the advancement of any modern economy. These two concepts play a strategic role in the evolution of any organization, defining its competitive advantages and thus securing its future survival. Here, in this chapter, we examine them in the light of the public sector and especially in the area of educational organizations management. We investigate under which circumstances they emerge, how they flourish or fail, and what impact they have on the daily operations of a PSEO. These concepts are dynamic, so the corresponding phenomena are discussed using analytical as well as discrete methodologies. We focus our attention on policies and strategies developed by the public sector, in the frame of e-government initiatives, so as to prepare the organizations for competition in the digital future. Finally, we propose a methodology appropriate for transforming a typical conservative PSEO into a modern, innovation-endorsing, and sustainable business model. It is important to aim at and describe in detail a step-by-step process that leads smoothly to the new situation, avoiding incongruities and disruptions. This is depicted in a roadmap sketched using the basic concepts embedded on a transition diagram. The work ends by wrapping up a psychological profile appropriate to cultivate to all PSEO stakeholders, in order to manage to administer changes of this magnitude and importance.


Creativity Innovation Education Public sector Organization ICT Excellence Bubble Management 


  1. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: the surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  2. Cointet, J., & Roth, C. (2007). How realistic should knowledge diffusion models be? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10, 5.Google Scholar
  3. Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Organizational structure and innovation revisited. In M. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 483–515). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delre, S., Jager, W., Bijmolt, H. A., & Janssen, M. (2010). Will it spread or not? the effects of social influences and network topology on innovation diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation, 27, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. EC Report (2009). The smart guide to innovation-based incubators. Publication Office of the EU.Google Scholar
  6. EU Report (2010). EU Budget 2009: Financial Report. Publication Office of the EU. Accessed 12 Sept 2012.
  7. Gowan, J. C. (1972). The development of the creative individual. San Diego: Knapp.Google Scholar
  8. Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (2002). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology (JSTOR), 83, 340–363.Google Scholar
  9. Hwang, A. & Arbaugh, J. B. (2010). Seeking feedback in blended learning: competitive versus cooperative student attitudes and their links to learning outcome. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
  10. Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: the key to Japan’s competitive success. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  11. Joint Research Centre (JRC)—Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. (2009). Innovation and Creativity in Education and Training in the EU Member States. Office for Official Publications of the EU.Google Scholar
  12. Khasawneh, B.S. (2008). Entrepreneurship promotion at educational institutions: a model suitable for emerging economies. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics.Google Scholar
  13. Ko, R. (2009). A computer scientist’s guide to business process management. ACM Crossroads, 15(4), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lassen, K. B., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2009). Complexity metrics for workflow nets. Information and Software Technology, 51, 610–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis, H., & Papadimitriou, C. (1981). Elements of the theory of computation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Mashayek, F., Ashgriz, N., Minkowycz, W. J., & Shotorban, B. (2002). Coalescence collision of liquid drops. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 46, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Muketa, G. M., Ghani, A. A. A., Selamat, S. H., & Atan, R. (2010). A survey of business process complexity metrics. Information Technology Journal, 9(7), 1336–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  19. OECD (2011). Education at a Glance 2011, OECD indicators. Accessed 18 Sept 2012.
  20. Penuel, W., Riet, M., Joshi, A., Pearlman, L., & Chong, M. K. (2010). The alignment of the informal and formal organizational supports for reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2010(46), 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusions of innovation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: theories and themes: research, development, and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  24. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Firestien, R. L. (1983). Theoretical perspectives on creative learning and its facilita-tion. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Valente, T. (1996). Network models for the diffusion of innovations. Computational & Mathematical Organizational Theory, 2(2), 163–164.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, E. (1999). Consilience, the unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Editions.Google Scholar
  28. Windrum, P., & Koch, P. (2008). Innovation in public sector services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantinos Zacharis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pandelis G. Ipsilandis
    • 2
    • 3
  • James O’Kane
    • 4
  1. 1.KarditsaHellas
  2. 2.Department of Project ManagementSchool of Business and Economics, Technological Education Institute of LarissaLarisaGreece
  3. 3.Board of Directors Greek Network of Project ManagersNikaia LarissasGreece
  4. 4.Business SchoolStaffordshire UniversityStaffordshireUK

Personalised recommendations