Engaging and Developing the Community Through Social Media: A Pragmatic Analysis in Policing Context in Hong Kong

  • Kevin K. W. HoEmail author
  • Calvin C. Yu
  • Michael C. L.  Lai
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 3)


Social media becomes increasingly popular among members of the public. The emergence of this new trend in the twenty-first century raises new opportunities for government agencies to extend their community networks for their operations. Here, we present a case study on how the Hong Kong Police Force should develop its social media public relations and policing strategies. In recent years, there is a growing trend that some opinions form quickly through social media with its quick viral cycle in Hong Kong. There are occasions where the conflicts between the Hong Kong Police Force and some members of the public are results of communication breakdown. Hence, it is becoming increasingly important for the law enforcement agencies, such as police, to properly engage with members of the public for public relations purpose. Plus, there have been a number of instances in the past few years, which materials involving confidential information related to the government agencies have been uploaded onto Web sites and blogs in Hong Kong. These situations do not only generate a lot of discussions among the online community in Hong Kong, but also engender public discussions from different angles as well as the safety of law enforcement officers. In this research, we use balanced scorecard to analyze the alternative strategies that the Hong Kong Police Force can use in social media. Based on our analysis, we develop strategic approaches, which are useful for law enforcement agencies and government agencies to develop their social media management and engagement policies.


Government-to-Citizen (G2C) e-government Social media Hong Kong SAR government Social media management and engagement strategies Balanced scorecard 


  1. Baim, S. A. (2009). Building police/community relations through virtual communities. In M. Khosrom-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (2nd ed., pp. 421–427). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  2. Breakthrough, (2010). Survey on youth media usage in Hong Kong in 2010. Retrieved on February 28, 2013, from
  3. British Broadcasting Corporation, (2000). Demon settles net libel case (March 30, 2000 edition). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  4. Caren, N., & Gaby, S. (2011). Occupy online: Facebook and the spread of occupy wall street, working paper. Retrieved on April 8, 2013, from
  5. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Government (2013). Thematic Household Survey Report No. 50. Retrieved on April 8, 2013, from
  6. chinaSMACK (2010). Hong Kong girl cyberbullying victim contemplates suicide, chinaSMACK (January 5, 2010 edition). Retrieved on April 8, 2013, from
  7. Chow, K. P., Ieong, R. S. C., Kwan, M.Y. K., Lai, P. K. Y., Law, F. Y. W., Tse, H. K. S., & Tse K. W. H. (2008). Security analysis of the Foxy Peer-to-Peer file sharing tool. HKU CS Tech Report TR-2008-09. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  8. Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Policy, 15(1/2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  9. Constantinides, E., & Fountain, S. J. (2008). Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing, 9(3), 231–244.Google Scholar
  10. Dearstyne, B. W. (2007). Blog, mashups, and Wikis: Oh, my! Information Management Journal, 41(4), 25–33.Google Scholar
  11. Farrell, H., & Drezner, Z. W. (2008). The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice, 134(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  12. Graf, J. (2008). Chapter 4: New media—The cutting edge of campaign communications. In R. Semiatin (Ed.), Campaigns on the cutting edge (pp. 48–68). Washington D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gueorguiev, I., Dimitrova, S., Komitska, M., Traykov, H., & Spassov, K. (2005). Balanced scorecard based management information system—A potential for public monitoring and good governance advancement. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(1), 29–38.Google Scholar
  14. Halaris, C., Magoutas, B., Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2007). Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e-government services. Internet Research, 17(4), 378–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herring, S. C., Scheldt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology and People, 18(2), 142–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho, K. K. W. (2007). The e-government development, IT strategies and portals of Hong Kong SAR Government. International Journal of Cases on Electronic Commerce, 3(2), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong Kong Government (1998). Digital 21Hong Kong special administrative region government information technology strategy. Retrieved on April 8, 2013, from
  18. Hong Kong Government (2001). Hong Kong: Connecting the worldDigital 21 strategy. Retrieved on April 8, 2013, from
  19. Hong Kong Government (2004). Digital 21 strategy: Sustainability and opportunities. Retrieved on April 8, 2013, from
  20. Hong Kong Government (2008). Digital 21 strategy: Continuing to build on our strengths through technology across the community. Retrieved on April 8, 2013, from
  21. Hong Kong Government (2013). Digital 21 strategy. Retrieved on April 8, 2013, from
  22. Hong Kong Police Force (2013). Junior Police CallOrganization Development. Retreived on April 8, 2013, from
  23. IBM (2010). IBM Social Computing Guidelines. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  24. Joinson, A. N. (2009). Privacy concerns, trust in government and attitudes to identity cards in the United Kingdom. In, Proceedings of the 42 nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, HI: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–80.Google Scholar
  27. Kitchin, R. (1998). Cyberspace: The world in the wires. Chichester, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Lawson-Body, A., Mukankusi, L., & Miler, G. (2008). An adaptation of the balanced scorecard for e-government service delivery: A content analysis. Journal of Service Science, 1(1), 75–82.Google Scholar
  29. Magro, M. J. (2012). A review of social media use in e-government. Administrative Sciences, 2(2), 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In Proceedings of the 37 th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, HI: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  31. Maratea, R. (2008). The e-rise and fall of social problems: The blogosphere as a public arena. Social Problems, 55(1), 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mazur, E. (2005). Teen blogs as mines of adolescent data. Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 180–182.Google Scholar
  33. Milstein, L. C. (2007). Avoiding legal pitfalls on user generated content sites. Journal of Internet Law, 11(3), 3–10.Google Scholar
  34. Mosca, L. (2010). From the streets to the Net? The political use of the internet by social movements. International Journal of E-Politics, 1(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mourtada, R., Salem, F. (2011). Civil movements: The impact of Facebook and Twitter. Arab Social Media Report 1(2). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  36. Mourtada, R., Salem, F. (2012). Social media in Arab World: Influencing societal and cultural change? Arab Social Media Report 2(1). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from 4 updated 29 08 12.pdf.
  37. National Public Radio (2007). Women file suit to defend online reputation. (June 18, 2007 edition). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  38. Obi, T. (2012). The 2012 Waseda University International e-Government Ranking. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from Released on e-Gov ranking 2012.pdf.
  39. Papadomichelaki, X., Magoutas, B., Halaris, C., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2006). A review of quality dimensions in e-government services. Electronic Government—Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4084, 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parameswaran, M., Zhao, X., Whinston, A. B., & Fang, F. (2007). Reengineering the internet for better security. Computer, 40(1), 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parameswaran, M., & Whinston, A. B. (2007). Research issues in social computing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(6), 336–350.Google Scholar
  42. Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability: Twenty years of chatting online. Behavior and Information Technology Journal, 20(5), 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  44. Rosemann, M., & Wiese, J. (1999) Measuring the performance of ERP software—a balanced scorecard approach. In Proceedings of the 10 th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Wellington, New Zealand: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Savell, L. (2007). Fifteen steps to reducing web site liability risks. Journal of Internet Law, 10(10), 7–11.Google Scholar
  46. Shapiro, A. L. (1999). The net that binds. The Nation (June 21, 1999 edition). Retrieved February 28, 2013, from
  47. Singer, A. (2013). Amazon will charge Conn. Sales tax. The Boston Globe (February 5, 2013 edition). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  48. Van Grembergen, W. (2000). The balanced scorecard and IT governance. IS Audit and Control Journal, 2, 40–43.Google Scholar
  49. Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes (2005). Measuring and improving IT governance through balanced scorecard. Information Systems Control Journal, 2.Google Scholar
  50. Wolverton, T. (2001). Amazon unit settles privacy lawsuit, CNET News (April 27, 2001 edition). Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  51. Yu, C., & P. J.-H. Hu (2007). Examining the impacts of institutional framework on e-government infrastructures: A study of Hong Kong experiences. In Proceedings of the 40 th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, HI: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  52. Zdjelar, R. (2012). The balance scorecard method as background for e-government in regional government. In Proceedings of Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems (pp. 287–296). Varazdin, Croatia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin K. W. Ho
    • 1
    Email author
  • Calvin C. Yu
    • 2
  • Michael C. L.  Lai
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Business and Public AdministrationUniversity of GuamMangilaoUSA
  2. 2.NetFish Christian New Media MovementTangram Research InstituteShatinHong Kong
  3. 3.Hong Kong Police ForceWan ChaiHong Kong

Personalised recommendations