Evaluation Methods for e-Strategic Transformation

  • Leonidas AnthopoulosEmail author
  • Nikolaos Blanas
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 3)


Governments define strategies in order to transform their political missions to reality, deal with various challenges, schedule public spending, and control public investments. This phenomenon occurs even at supranational levels, where governments negotiate and agree on common objectives, which comes close enough to competitive political interests. Government strategic planning is crucial and defines necessary strategic elements such as vision, mission, success factors, stakeholders, etc. Moreover, strategic planning is a continuous process, since strategic updates follow previous plans and recognize existing successes and failures. Strategic implementation occurs via framework programs, which allocate funding on alternative priorities, while they identify methods for strategic assessment and monitoring. This chapter focuses on government e-strategies and aims to illustrate whether program evaluation can result in the assessment of strategic transformation. In this context, existing program evaluation methods are compared according to their applicability on strategic transformation’s evaluation. This comparison will be applied on data from Greece, where three government e-strategies have been evolved since late 1990s and respective framework programs have been implemented.


Strategic management e-strategies European commission Evaluation Strategic transformation 


  1. Anthopoulos, L., & Fitsilis, P. (2014). Trends in e-Strategic Management: How do Governments Transform their Policies? International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA). Vol.4, pp. 14–28 Google Scholar
  2. Anthopoulos, L., Triantafyllou, D., & Fitsilis, P. (2012), e-Strategic Management Lessons from Greece. In Reddick Ch. (Ed.), Public Sector Transformation through E-Government: Experiences from Europe and North America (pp. 224–241). ISBN: 978-0-415-52737-8. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bachtler, J., & Taylor, S. (2003). The added Value of the Structural Funds: A Regional Perspective IQ-Net Repοrt on the Reform of the Structural Funds. EPRC, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. Retrieved May 2013, from
  4. European Commission. (2010a). The Lisbon Strategy 2000–2010. An analysis and evaluation of the methods used and results achieved. Directorate General For Internal Policies. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. Retrieved March, 2013, from
  5. European Commission. (2010b). EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Retrieved March, 2013, from
  6. European Commission. (2005). Guidelines of project/programme evaluations. Retrieved May, 2013, from
  7. European Commission. (2004a). Εx-Ante Evaluation, a practical guide for preparing proposals for expenditure programmes, December 2001 European commission, Benchmarking Enterprise Policy: Results from the 2004 Scoreboard, Brussels 2004. Retrieved, May 2013, from
  8. European Commission. (2004b). Evaluating ΕU Activities, a practical guide for the Commission services, Brussels 2004. Retrieved May, 2013, from
  9. European Commission. (2004c). Overview of Evaluation Guides in the Commission, Brussels 2004. Retrieved May, 2013, from
  10. European Commission. (1999a). Methodological Working Paper No. 2 for the 2000–2006 Programming Period: The Ex Ante Evaluation of Structural Funds Interventions. Retrieved May, 2013, from
  11. European Commission. (1999b). Methodological Working Paper No. 3 for the 2000–2006 Programming Period: Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation: An indicative methodology. Retrieved May, 2013, from
  12. Fitzgerald, J., Kearney, I., Morgenroth, E.,& Smyth, D. (1999). National Investment Priorities for the Period 20002006. The Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin. Retrieved May, 2013, from
  13. Greek Ministry of Finance. (2010). Digital Planning Public Consultation results (in Greek). Retrieved September, 2011, from
  14. Greek Observatory. (2011). Digital Literacy in Greece compared to EU27 2007–2010 (in Greek). Retrieved May, 2013, from:
  15. Greek Special Secretary for Digital Planning. (2006). Digital Convergence (in Greek). Retrieved May, 2013, from
  16. Greek Special Secretary for Digital Planning. (2006). Digital Strategy 20062013 (in Greek). Retrieved May, 2013, from
  17. Greek Special Secretary for Digital Planning. (2004). Annual Ex-Ante Evaluation Report for the Greek Information Society (in Greek). Retrieved May, 2013, from
  18. Greek Special Secretary for Digital Planning. (2004b). Annual Mid-term Evaluation Report for the Greek Information Society (in Greek). Retrieved May, 2013, from
  19. Johnson, G., Scholes, K.,& Whittington, R. (2005). Managing Strategic Change. Exploring Corporate Strategy, (7th ed.), (pp. 503–543). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Lysons, K., & Farrington, B. (2006). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing. Chapter 2.Google Scholar
  21. Tavistock Institute. (2003). The Evaluation of Socio-Economic Development, The Guide. London 2003. Retrieved May, 2013, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Project Management DepartmentTEI of LarissaLarissaGreece

Personalised recommendations