Advertisement

Imperial Bureaucracy and Criminal Trials

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter attempts to shed lights on the millennial bureaucratic tradition of magistrate’s court, the indigenous notion of justice and the conduct of imperial criminal trials. Law in ancient China is developed completely free of Western influences (Jones 2003). In the long history of imperial China from 221 BC to 1911 AD, the public image of law is mostly that of penal law and fearful sanctions. There is almost no exception that threat of physical punishment is attached to any normal criminal trial. Legitimized judicial torture is a permanent feature in reality as well as in the literary and dramatic depiction of Chinese imperial criminal trials. On the one hand, torture can be used indiscriminately to those entangled in a criminal case—the petitioners, the accused, and the witnesses.

Keywords

Procedural Justice Qing Dynasty Criminal Case Criminal Trial Confucian Ethic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Belkin, I. (2011). China’s tortuous path toward ending torture in criminal investigations. Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 24, 273–301.Google Scholar
  2. Ch’u, T. (1961). Law and society in traditional china. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
  3. Edwards, R. R. (2003). The role of case nprecedent in the Qing judicial process as reflected in appellate rulings. In S. Hsu (Ed.), Understanding china's legal system: Essay in honor of Jerome A. Cohen. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ch’u, T. (1962). Local government in china under the ch’ing. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  5. Hegel, R. E. (2009). True crimes in 18th-century china: 20 case histories. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jones, W. C. (2003). Trying to understand the current chinese legal system. In Hsu, S.(Ed.), Understanding chinese legal system: essays in honor of professor Jerome A. Cohen. New York: New York University Press, 7–45.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, W. C. (1994). The Great Qing Code. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kahn, P. W. (2009). Justice or legitimacy: A response to ocko and gilmartin. Journal of Asian Studies, 68, 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, P. (1981). In search of justice: Law and morality in three chinese dramas. In: Wilson, R., Greenblatt, S. L. & Wilson, A. A. (Eds.), Moral Behavior in Chinese Society. New York: Praeger Publishers, 104–125.Google Scholar
  10. Macauley, M. (1999). Social power and legal culture: Litigation masters in late imperial china. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Meadows, T. T. (1970). Desultory notes on the government and people of china and on the chinese language. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Meijer, M. T. (1984). Autumn assizes in ch’ing law. T’oung Pao, Second Series, 70, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muhlhahn, K. (2009). Criminal justice in china: A history. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  14. Ocko, J. K. (1982). Bureaucratic reform in provincial china: Ting jih-chang in restoration kiangsu, 1867–1870. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. van Gulik, R. (1956, 1997). The chinese maze murders: A Judge Dee Mystery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Watt, J. R. (1972). The district magistrate in late Imperial china. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Weber, M. (1915/1951). The religion of china: Confucianism and Taoism (translated and edited by Hans H. Gerth). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wu, W. & Vander Beken, T. (2010). Police torture in china and its causes: A review of literature. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 43(93), 557–579.Google Scholar
  19. Wu, W., & Vander Beken, T. (2011). The evolution of criminal interrogation rules in china. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 40(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  20. Zu, W. (2008). Primary rules on criminal evidence in ancient china and its theoretical basis (zhongguo gudai jugongdingzui xingshizhengju shouyaoguize ji lilunjiexi). Law and Social Development 79(1), 42–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations